# 120/Sat-Nya.-9/Budget/26/85 Nya. Anubhag-2 (Adhinasth Nyayalaya) Anubhag, dated

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 120/Admn.(G)
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1990-08-04
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 120/Admn.(G)
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/120-sat-nya-9-budget-26-85-nya-anubhag-2-adhinasth-nyayalaya-anubhag-dated-162136
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

118
120/Sat-Nya.-9/Budget/26/85 Nya. Anubhag-2 (Adhinasth Nyayalaya) Anubhag, dated
4.8.1990 (copy enclosed) so that the facility of stenographers may be provided to them.
I am accordingly to send herewith the revised list containing the names of 442
Munsif Magistrates, Judicial Magistrates, Railway Magistrates and Metropolitan
Magistrates alongwilh a list of 228 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates and Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrates indicating the date of their appointment and to request
you to provide them the facility of stenographers whereever they are posted.
1 am further to say that all the Officers who are being provided the facility of
stenographers are requested to give 20% more work in their out-turn from the date the
facility of stenographers is provided to them.
It is further added that the special pay of Rs.25/-per month as admissible to the
Munsarim Reader will be discontinued immediately from the date Presiding Officer of
their Courtsw ith whom they are attached to, are provided with the facility of
stenographer as provided in G.O.No. U.O. l20/II-Nyay-9/Budget/26/85 Nyay Anubhag
dated 4th August, 1990.
(v)
V.I.P. duty
C.L. No. C -110/1994, dated 21st Novernber, 1994
I am directed to say that the Court has taken a view that no credit be given to any
Judicial Officer in his work quota for the month, on the ground that he was absent from
Court on V.I.P. duty, unless he was specifically so directed by the High Court.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to bring this fact to the notice of all the
Judicial Officers posted in your Judgeship for strict compliance.
C.L. No. 120/Admn.(G), dated 9th December, 1994
Judicial Officers on VIP duty, credit in work quota
Keeping in view the heavy pendency of work load in the subordinate Courts and
the imperative necessity of ensuring its expeditious disposal, the Hon‟ble Chief Justice
and Judges have been pleased to direct that no credit be given to any Judicial Officer in
his work quota for the month, on the ground that he was unable to attend Court on any
particular day, as he was on VIP duty that day, unless he is specifically so deputed, by the
High Court. These instructions may kindly be brought to the pointed attention of all the
Judicial Officers posted in your Sessions Division.
This Circular Letter is being issued in supersession of Circular Letter No. C-110/
Admn. (G) of November 21,1994.
[15] RESIDENTIAL ACCOMODATIONS:
(i)
Allotment of houses
C.L. No. 57/lVh-3-1(2) dated 5th September, 1949

If it is found that Judicial Officers have been unfairly discriminated in the matter of
allotment of houses by the Collector the fact should immediately be brought to the notice
of Court for necessary action.
119
C.L. No. 16/IVh-3 dated 13th February, 1956
District Judge should approach the District Magistrate and arrange with him so that
houses are allotted to Judicial Officers not by name but the office held by them.
C.L. No. 97 dated 27th October, 1958
A Judicial officer on transfer often faces the difficulty of securing the house of his
predecessor. This difficulty may partially be solved if timely information is sent to the
new station whether or not the officer transferred takes upon himself the responsibility of
paying rent of the house occupied by his predecessor after it has been vacated by the
latter. As such on receipt of an order of transfer of a Judicial officer to another station
where he is to succeed another officer, the District Judge should immediately contact the
officer under him and ascertain from him if he is willing to pay the rent of the house
occupied by the officer he is going to relieve, in the event of its being allotted to him, for
the period during which the house remains vacant after it has been vacated by his
predecessor and before he occupies it. The District Judge should forthwith send
intimation of this fact to the District Judge of the station to which the officer is being
transferred and the District Judge of that station should thereupon intimate this fact to the
District Magistrate and try to secure the accommodation for the new officer.
C.L. No. 153/S dated 15th December, 1975
A list of residential buildings under the control of District Judges should be sent to
the Accountant General, the Court and the Government for record. A statement in Form
No. 30, as required under paragraph 287 of F.H.B., Vol. V should also be prepared and
sent to the A.G., U.P. and the Court and it should be ensured that the rent of residential
houses is realized from the Judicial Officers regularly in accordance with the sanctioned
rent statements.
C.L. No. 127/S (b) dated 23rd November, 1970
In order to obviate difficulties of Judicial Officers for non-availability of suitable
residences on their transfer from one district to another, District Judges should strictly
comply with the following instructions:
1.
If an officer is living in a private residence and a government residence is
made available to him, he must vacate the private residence, otherwise he
will be required to pay the rent of the government residence also.
2.
If the officer transferred to another station does not occupy the official
residence vacated by his predecessor or occupies it late by his own
volition, he will have to pay the rent of the residence in question for the
period it remains vacant on account of his failure to occupy it.
3.
If the officer transferred to another station has been living in an allotted
house, the same should be made available to his successor, and if there is
any difficulty the matter should be brought to the notice of the Court
immediately prior to the vacation of the house by the officer transferred,
so that if necessary, the order of transfer may be cancelled and the Judicial
Department does not lose the house.