# 53. Deputy Secretary, U.P. Legal Aid & Advice Board, Lucknow

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 74/lV-e/82
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1995-07-03
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 74/lV-e/82
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/53-deputy-secretary-u-p-legal-aid-advice-board-lucknow-162047
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

70
53. Deputy Secretary, U.P. Legal Aid & Advice Board, Lucknow.
54. Competent Officer, Evacuee Property, Lucknow.
55. Law Officer, Directorate of Bal Vikas Sewa Avam Pustahar, U.P.,
Lucknow.
56. Legal Adviser, NOIDA, Ghaziabad (10 years‟ experience)
57.
Manager/Dy. Manager (Law), Gorakhpur Industrial Development Authority,
Gorakhpur.
58. Law Officer, PICUP, Lucknow.
59. Enquiry Officer, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Lucknow.
60. Law Officer, Agra Development Authority, Agra.
61. Deputy Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunals, Bench at Allahabad/
Lucknow.
62. Deputy Law Officer, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi.
63. Deputy Director (Law), Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel National Police
Academy, Hyderabad.
64. Joint Director (Law), Officer of Monopoly & Restrictive Trade Practices
Commission, (M.R.T.P. Commission), New Delhi.
65. Deputy Director, Sampoornanand Prison Training Institute, Lucknow.
66.
Legal Officer, Environment Cell of the Department of Environment, Forest
and Wild Life, Delhi.
I am further to say that an officer shall not opt for more than two deputation posts.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to circulate the copies of this letter to all the
eligible Officers working under you and obtain their consent on the prescribed proforma.
Please ensure that the consent of the Officers should reach the Court latest by July 3,
1995.
The option given by the Officers for the posts mentioned above shall be valid for a
period of one year.
(iv) Handing over of charge
C.L. No. 74/lV-e/82 Admn.(A) dated 20 November, 1982
On receipt of orders of transfer, the officer concerned should handover the charge
within a week of receipt of such orders and proceed to the new station of his posting. In
case he has some genuine reasons for not handing over charge within a week, he should
obtain prior permission of the Court to hand over the charge on some later date but his
request will be accepted only, if the District Judge recommends it.
If a District Judge is under orders of transfer and he is required to handover the
charge immediately or by a date fixed by the Court, he should handover accordingly and
proceed to his new station of posting after contacting his predecessor. In case he is unable
to handover the charge according to the direction of the Court for some cogent reasons,
he should obtain prior permission of the Court.
Charge certificates should be sent to the Court soon after an officer hands over the
charge at one station and takes over the charge at another station. In case an officer
71
delays in handing over the charge without the prior permission of the Court, the District
Judge should bring this fact to the notice of the Court.
If an officer proceeds on leave after taking over charge at a station, the District
Judge should not permit him to avail of the leave in anticipation of sanction unless he
feels that there are compelling circumstances to do so. He should forward the leave
application with a note of the fact whether or not the officer‟s need for taking leave is
genuine and also if necessary, that he has permitted the officer to avail of the leave in
anticipation of sanction. In the absence of the recommendation of the District Judge, the
leave applied for by the officer shall be liable to be refused.
C.L. No. 56/IVe-82/Admn. (A) dated 31st August, 1984
The Officers on transfer should take over at the station of their posting in
accordance with the orders of their transfer issued by the Court from time to time and, in
the event of their failure to do so, disciplinary action would follow against them.
(v) Charge certificate
C.L. No. 3/IVf-54 dated 18th January, 1955
Charge certificates before being sent to Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh, must be
signed both by the relieving and relieved Officers and countersigned.
Charge certificates in respect of District Judges shall be countersigned by the
Registrar of the High Court and those in respect of other Judicial Officers by the District
Judge concerned.
C.L. No. 8 dated 27th January, 1961
The instructions contained in paragraph 128 of the M.G.Os.and G.O. No. A-120/IIA-1951, dated January 23, 1951, should be strictly followed and it should be ensured that
the charge certificates are despatched promptly to the Appointment (A)* (* Redesignated
as Appointment Section - 34, vide the Business of Uttar Pradesh (Allocation) Rules,
1975)Department of the Government with the names and designation of the Officers
typed on them in block letters.
Provisions of Paragraph 115 of the Financial Handbook, Volume V (Part I) for
submission of charge certificates and paragraph 17(i) of Financial Handbook, Volume II
(Parts II to IV), regarding drawals without authority of the A.G., U.P., should be strictly
complied with.
C.L. No. 32/IV/Admn. (A) dated 19th March, 1980
While signing charge certificates, the Officers should legibly sign their full names
and should not put down their initials only.
C.L. No. 18/95, dated 8th May, 1995
Charge Certificate of Judicial Officers
The Computer Centre of the High Court has been functioning for last three years
and has been maintaining the posting details of the Judicial Officers. The exact date of
the handing and taking over the charge of a particular post is also being entered in the
computer. The copy of the charge certificate sent to the High Court is being dealt by the