# and the year first above written

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 17479/-97/General/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1999-11-02
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 17479/-97/General/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/and-the-year-first-above-written-162384
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

233
(3)
The stamp duty on this instrument will be borne by the Government, in
witnesses where, of the parties hereto have hereunto set their respective hands on the day
and the year first above written.
Signed by .................................... ... Signed by .............
For and on behalf of the Government ............................................... Bounden-I
of the State of Uttar Pradesh
 Signed by ........................

 Bounden-II
Witnesses:
Witnesses:
1 ......................................................... 1 ...................................................
 (Name and address) (Name and address)
2 ........................................................ 2 ...................................................
 (Name and address) (Name and address)
(Name of the competent court to be given here)
C.L. No. 17479/-97/General/Admn. (A) /Dated: 2nd November 1999
Decentralisation of procedure for payment of the amount of Group Insurance under
U.P. State Employees Group Insurance Scheme.
I am directed to invite your attention to G.O. No. Beema-8/x-89/91/A/99, dated 16.
7. 1999 (copy enclosed for ready reference addressed to all Head of Departments/Head of
the Offices as well as Chief Treasury Officers/Senior Treasury Officers/Treasury Officers
of the State of U. P., on the above subject and to say that the claims of Group Insurance
of retired/deceased officers/officials who had earlier submitted through Head of
Department/Office to the Directorate of Group Insurance Scheme, U.P., Lucknow, for
payment of the amount of Group Insurance on Form No. 26 or 27 (as the case may be)
prior to 30-9-1999, shall be decided by the aforesaid Directorate.
I am to add that the procedure for payment of the amount of Group Insurance of
retired/deceased Officers/ Officials as on 30-9-99, and onwards, shall now be adopted, as
envisaged in paras 4 and 5 of the said G.O. dated 16.7.99
I am therefore, to request you kindly to ensure the strict compliance of the aforesaid
G.O. dated 16.7.99, under intimation to the Court.
[22]
STANDARD
PRESCRIBED
FOR
ENGLISH
AND
HINDI
TYPISTS/COPYISTS
C.L. No. 49/Vlllb-89/Admn.(G) dated 17th July, 1990
Amendment to be made in Rule 267 of the General Rules (Civil), 1957 Volume 1.
I am directed to refer to Court‟s Notification No. 298/VIIIB-89 dated 26.7.88
(correction slip No. 107) whereby Rule 267 of the General Rules (Civil), 1957 Volume 1
was amended and the daily quota of the copyists and typists was enhanced accordingly.
In this connection I am to say that on receipt of representations from various corner a
revision of the said quota is under consideration of the Hon‟ble Court.
234
I am, therefore, to request that pending approval of the aforesaid revision, the
standard prescribed for English and Hindi typists falling short by 20% and that of English
and Hindi copyists falling short by 12% may not be adversely considered and the same be
treated as sufficient for the purpose of counting their outturn.
[23] LITIGATION
C.L. No. 2679/L.C. dated 25th May, 1998
Submission of List of Cases with full particulars concerning Civil Court employees
In which High Court and/or the District Judge are the parties.
As per prevalent practice in the past the District Judges were permitted to contest
the cases concerning its employees in consultation with the Chief Standing Counsel
under intimation to the Court. It has been noticed that the copies of the cases concerning
Civil Court employees in which High Court is not a party were not made available to the
Cell by the Chief Standing Counsel nor the Litigation Cell has any knowledge about such
cases and regarding filing of counter affidavit in such cases.
Now on the recommendation of the Court the State Government has been pleased
to appoint shri Sunil Ambwani, Sri Sudhir Agrawal and Sri K.R.Sirohi Advocates as
Special Counsel to look after the cases of Officers and Officials of the High Court,
Officers of Subordinate Judiciary and Officials/employees of Civil Courts of the State of
Uttar Pradesh. Shri Sunil Ambwani has been authorised to accept notices of such cases
on behalf of the High Court and/or District Courts.
After approval of the aforesaid panel the Special Counsel find it very difficult to
contest the cases concerning Civil Court employees In the absence of copies of counter
affidavits in the cases and also In the absence of copies of writ petitions in which High
Court is not a party.
In the circumstances narrated hereinabove I am desired to request you to:
a) furnish a list of cases with full particulars concerning employees if the
Judgeship.
b) make available copies of the counter affidavits filed by or on behalf of the
District Judge in the cases concerning employees of the Judgeship:
c) make also available the copies of the writ petitions/cases preferred by the
aggrieved employees of the Judgeship in which High Court is not a party.
Please ensure strict compliance of the directions at the earliest, preferably within a
fortnight from the date of receipt of the Circular Letter.
[24] MISCELLANEOUS
(a) Change of name of English Office
C.L. No. 42/Xe-5 dated 15th April, 1961
The name of English Office is changed as "Administrative Office" (Prashashkiya
Karyalaya).