# applications will be liable to be forwarded late and ultimately rejected by the

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 88
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1959-10-05
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 88
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/applications-will-be-liable-to-be-forwarded-late-and-ultimately-rejected-by-the-162276
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

186
concerned should invariably forward the character roll of the candidate along with his
application.
C.L. No. 88 dated 5th October, 1959
All the Officers and the staff dealing with such applications should see that these
applications are submitted to Government in the appropriate department well in advance
of the last date of submission and in no case should these reach Government less than a
fortnight before the last date prescribed for their submission failing which the
applications will be liable to be forwarded late and ultimately rejected by the
Commission.
[8] EXTENSION OF SERVICE
G.L. No. 3297-5 dated 16th August, 1933
Orders granting extension of service to ministerial officers should not be passed
ordinarily more than six months or less than three months before the date on which the
official is due to retire. When such an order has been passed by a District Judge, it would
be improper for his successor to cancel it unless the order is illegal or the health of the
official concerned has broken down since the passing of the order or, for other reasons, it
is detrimental in the public intrest to retain him in service any longer.
C.L. No. 41 Admn. (D) Section dated 14th April, 1980
No re-employment or extension in service should be given to an employee who has
completed the age of 58 years without prior reference to the Court and the Government
orders in this behalf should be strictly complied with.
C.L. No. 25 / Main (A) / J.R. (I) Dated : 01. 9. 2004
Term of office of the class III employees who after their retirement have been
deployed to work in the courts of Spl. Judicial Magistrate/ Spl. Metropolitan
Magistrate.
The District Judges from time to time desired to know as to what is the term of
office of class III employees who after their retirement, have been deployed to work in
the courts of Spl. Judicial Magistrate/Spl. Metropolitan Magistrate.
In this regard, I am directed to inform you that after careful consideration of the
matter, the Hon‟ble Court has decided that with immediate effect the term of office of the
class III employee who have been re-employed to work in the said courts after their
retirement, shall be till attaining the age of 65 years.
I am also to add here that as per G.O. 3094/VII-Nyay-2-2010/95 dated Feb. 5, 1997
services of one peon who shall be paid Rs. 35/- per actual working day shall also be
admissible to the spl. J.M. /Spl. M.M. the person so employed shall not be allowed to
continue after he attains the age of 65 Years age.
I am, therfore, to request you kindly to bring the decision of the Hon'ble Court in
the aforsaid matter to the notice of all concerned.
(9) SECURITY
(i) Court officials
C.L. No. 66/VIII-b-205 dated 25th November, 1954
The following instructions should be carefully noted for strict compliance: