# Appointment of class III employees on Ad-hoc basis

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 35/Ve-4/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1996-07-19
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 35/Ve-4/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/appointment-of-class-iii-employees-on-ad-hoc-basis-162189
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

140
C.L. No. 35/Ve-4/Admn. (D) dated May 27. 1992
Appointment of class III employees on Ad-hoc basis

I am directed to inform that no ad hoc appointment on class III posts be made
without prior approval of Hon‟ble the Chief Justice.
C.L. No. 66/2007Admin(D) : Dated :13.12.2007.
Recruitment of Staff .

 It has been brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Court that a large number of
vacancies are pending in various judgeships of the State which is hampering the judicial
functioning of the Subordinate courts which are already under tremendous constraint due
to mounting rate of new cases being filed every year necessitating the increase in the
existing sanctioned strength of the staff. Therefore the Hon'ble Court has desired that in
the first place, to surmount this problem, in all the judgeships, the existing vacancies be
filled up immediately making recruitment under the existing Rules, Circular Letters and
the G.Os. adopted by the Court.

Therefore you are requested to kindly fill up the existing vacancies in your
judgeship at the earliest in accordance with the existing Rules C.Ls. And the G,Os.
C.L. No. 36 Dated : Allahabad : July 19, 1996

Information Regarding ad hoc Appointments made in the Judgeships subordinate to
High Court it has come to the notice of the Hcn‟ble Court that ad-hoc appointments have
been made by the District Judges without the prior permission/sanction of the Hon‟ble
Court,

The Hon‟ble Court has directed that the District Judges should furnish, the
following information‟s so that appropriate action in the matter may be taken:
1.
State the number, the name of the candidates with details of parentage, their
addresses, the date of their appointments and the period for which they have
been appointed,
2.
Whether any previous permission of the Hon‟ble Court has been obtained
before making such appointments/, if so, the copy of the order communicated
by the Hon‟ble Court may be enclosed.
3.
State whether the appointments have been made under Rule 269 of. General
Rules (Civil) or any other provisions contained in any Statuette
4.
Also enclose the photo-stat copy of the appointment letters.
I am therefore, to request you to kindly comply the directions of the Hon‟ble Court
by furnishing the afores aid information‟s at the earliest.
C.L. No. 10/Admn. (D) dated March, 11, 1997
Information regarding Ad-hoc appointments made in the Judgeship. to High Court
I am directed to refer to the courts circuler letter No. 36/Admn. (D) dated 19.7.1996
on the above subject and to request you kindly to furnished requiste informations as
asked for therein to the court, at a very early date.
141
(ii) Apprentices
G.L. No. 451/A dated 8th February, 1923
All apprentices in a judgeship should be brought on to one consolidated list and
District Judges should assign them to various courts and post them as required to fill
causal vacancies.
(iii) Amins
G.L. No. 15/A-9 dated 7th May, 1940
The Court considers that a District Judge is not obliged to insist that a candidate for
the post of Amin should have passed in theoretical and practical survey, if he is satisfied
that the requirement of Chapter XXI, rule 522 of the General Rules (Civil), 1957 are
fulfilled; but except in special circumstances, exemptions should not be granted.
C.L. No. 65/Ve-501 dated 1st August, 1968

Only trained Amins should be appointed to the post of Amins, if available and
only those untrained officials should be appointed as Amins who give an undertaking to
take the training of Amins at the Kanungo Training School at Hardoi.
(iv) Stenographers
G.L. No. 19/Ve-47-6(4) dated 20th December, 1946
Government has sanctioned a post of stenographer for each permanent Civil
Judge or Small Cause Court Judge. A stenographer may also be entertained on a
temporary basis in the scale sanctioned by the Government, for additional courts of Civil
Judge, if any, in each judgeship.
C.L. No. 106/Ve-47 dated 22nd November, 1961and
C.L. No. 9/Ve-47 dated 18th February, 1965
When an official is substantively appointed as a stenographer of the court of a
District Judge or the court of an Additional District Judge, his name, date of birth and
also the date of confirmation should be communicated to the Court, indicating the
vacancy in which he is confirmed.
C.L. No. 67/Ve-47 dated 19th July, 1969
Annual remarks in respect of stenographers should not be sent to the Court as the
Selection Grade in their cadre has been abolished in terms of the report of the U.P. Pay
Rationalization Committee.
(v) Retrenched employees
C.E. No. 96 dated 15th November, 1967
Attention is invited to U.P. Absorption of Retrenched Employees Rules, 1967,
published in U.P. Gazette, dated November 4, 1967. In clarification of rule 2(b) of the
said Rules it has been decided that the certificate to be granted to employees liable to
retrenchment will be granted in proforma No. 1 by the concerned appointing authority.