# Banna Lal v. State of U.P. & Ors

- **Citation:** (2025) 5 ILRA 1080
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2025-05-01
- **Case number:** Writ - A No. 27328 of 2018
- **Bench:** Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/banna-lal-v-state-of-u-p-ors-53426
- **Pages:** 6

## Headnote

Service Law - Assistant Teacher in Basic
Schools - Equivalence of Qualification - IAF
Education Certificate vis-à-vis Intermediate -
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education (RTE) Act, 2009 - Whether I.A.F.
Education Test certificate is equivalent to
Intermediate examination for appointment as
Assistant Teacher in Basic Schools. Held : IAF
Education
Certificate
is
equivalent
to
Intermediate,
in
view
of
Circular
dated
28.4.1992 issued by Secretary, State of U.P.;
Circular issued by the Ministry of Human
Resource Development dated 23.8.2017, and
judgment of Ram Lal Srivastava Vs State Of U.P.
And
Others,
Neutral
Citation
No.
2019:
AHC:205812 (Para 18) (E-5)

## Text

1080 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
Memorandum, dated 1.5.1987. The BHU
on its own has accepted the claim of Dr.
Sushil
Kumar
Singh
in
similar
circumstances in 2013. There is otherwise
no prior adjudication of the claim of Sri
Sinha by this Court.

58. In such circumstances, we are of
the view that the writ petition filed by Sri
Sinha was liable to be allowed. Learned
Single Judge while rejecting the batch of
petitions has not examined the facts of the
case of Sri Sinha. In fact there is no
consideration of the appellant's case by the
learned Single Judge.

59. In such view of the matter and for the
discussion aforesaid, Special Appeal No. 309 of
2025, filed by Sri Akhoury Sudhir Kumar
Sinha, succeeds and is allowed. The judgment
of learned Single Judge, dated 18.3.2025,
dismissing Writ-A No. 7111 of 2020, is set
aside. A writ of mandamus is issued to the
respondents to extend the benefit of pension
scheme to Sri Akhoury Sudhir Kumar Sinha on
the condition that he shall deposit CPF benefits
availed, if any, alongwith 8% yearly interest
within two months from today.

60. For the reasons and discussions
held above all other appeals i.e. Special
Appeal Nos. 228 of 2025 and 235 of 2025
(except Special Appeal No. 309 of 2025),
fail and are dismissed.

61. No order is passed as to costs.
----------
(2025) 5 ILRA 1080
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 01.05.2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM
SHAMSHERY, J.
Writ - A No. 27328 of 2018

Banna Lal ...Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. ...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:
Dinesh Kumar, Lal Babu Lal, Manish Singh,
Naresh Singh Tomar, Sushma Singh

Counsel for the Respondents:
Ashok Kumar Yadav, C.S.C.

Service Law - Assistant Teacher in Basic
Schools - Equivalence of Qualification - IAF
Education Certificate vis-à-vis Intermediate -
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory
Education (RTE) Act, 2009 - Whether I.A.F.
Education Test certificate is equivalent to
Intermediate examination for appointment as
Assistant Teacher in Basic Schools. Held : IAF
Education
Certificate
is
equivalent
to
Intermediate,
in
view
of
Circular
dated
28.4.1992 issued by Secretary, State of U.P.;
Circular issued by the Ministry of Human
Resource Development dated 23.8.2017, and
judgment of Ram Lal Srivastava Vs State Of U.P.
And
Others,
Neutral
Citation
No.
2019:
AHC:205812 (Para 18) (E-5)

(Delivered by Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam
Shamshery, J.)

1. Heard Sri Yatindra, learned Amicus
Curiae, Sri Sarv Dev Singh, learned
counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Shahi
for respondent nos.2 and 3.

2. Petitioner had joined Air Force as an
Airman in the year 1975 after his High School
Examination. He passed I.A.F. Education Test
for promotion to the rank of Corporal under
Scheme 'A' in August, 1979 held in and
conducted by Air Force Headquarters, New
Delhi with more than 50 percent.

3. According to the case of the
petitioner
I.A.F.
Education
Test
is
5 All. Banna Lal Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
1081
equivalent to Intermediate Examination and
on basis of it during service he has passed
Graduation from Kalkatiya University,
Warrangal, Anhdra Pradesh in 1992.

4. The petitioner retired from Air
Force on 30.11.2007 and thereafter he
passed B.Ed Degree in the year 2008, and
completed B.T.C. Training in the year
2010-2012.

5. On basis of above qualifications, he
has participated in a recruitment process for
appointment of Assistant Teacher in Basic
Schools, in which he was selected and
given appointment vide appointment letter
dated 25.7.2013 and he joined at a Primary
School.

6. Sri Yatindra, learned Amicus Curaie
has submitted that a notice dated 23.4.2014
was issued to petitioner about equivalence
of IAF Education Test with Intermediate
examination, however respondents were
not satisfied with the reply and petitioner's
services were terminated by an order dated
01.10.2014 Relevant part of the impugned
order is reproduced hereinafter:

"सतचव माध्यतमक तशक्षा पररषद, उत्तर प्रदेश
इलाहाबाद को इस कायाथलय के पत्राांक/तशतवर/1985/201415 तदनाांक 09.05.2014 द्वारा उक्त के सम्बन्द्ि में सम्पूणथ
तववरण अांतकि करिे हुए श्री बन्द्ना लाल द्वारा उत्तीणथ वायुसेना ट्रेड
परीक्षा को इण्ड्टरमीतडएट के समकक्ष माना र्जा सकिा है अिवा नहीं
के सम्बन्द्ि में मागथ दशथन माांगा गया। उक्त पृच्िा के सम्बन्द्ि में
सतचव, माध्यतमक तशक्षा पररषद, उत्तर प्रदेश, इलाहाबाद ने पत्राांक
- पररषद -9/146 तदनाांक 09.06.2014 द्वारा सूतचि तकया
गया तक भारिीय वायुसेना द्वारा र्जारी प्रमाण पत्र (आई.ए.एि)
पररषद की इण्ड्टरमीतडएट परीक्षा के समक्ष मान्द्य नहीं है।

उक्त से थपष्ट है तक श्री बन्द्ना लाल द्वारा तनयुतक्त प्रातप्त
के तलये इण्ड्टरमीतडएट परीक्षा उत्तीणथ होने के सम्बन्द्ि में र्जो अतभलेख
प्रथिुि तकये गये वह इण्ड्टमीतडएट परीक्षा के समकक्ष मान्द्य नहीं है।

अिः श्री बन्द्ना लाल द्वारा प्रथिुि वायु सैतनक ट्रेड
परीक्षा का सतटथतिकेट र्जो REB (SZ) TAMBARAM
द्वारा र्जारी तकया गया है, इण्ड्टरमीतडएट परीक्षा के समकक्ष न होने के
कारण इस कायाथलय के पत्राांक/आदेश सांख्या/1038566/2013-14 तदनाांक 25.07.2013 तवकास खण्ड्ड कोराव
इलाहाबाद की सेवा समाप्त की र्जािी है।"

7. That details of contents of a
communication dated 20.2.2014 issued by
Directorate of Air Veterans Air Head
Quarters, New Delhi and addressed to
District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Allahabad
is reproduced hereinafter:

"तर्जला बेतसक तशक्षा अतिकारी

इलाहाबाद (उ०प्र०)

नव तनयुक्त पररषदीय अध्यापक के इण्ड्टरमीतडएट अांक
पत्र के सत्यापन के सम्बन्द्ि में

महोदय,

1- आपके पत्राांक/तशतवर/25305/2013-14
तदनाांक 11/12/2013 के सांदभथ में।

2- आपको सूतचि तकया र्जािा है तक उक्त पत्र के
साि सांलग्न अांक पत्र इण्ड्टरमीतडएट अांक पत्र नहीं है। यह अांक पत्र
उक्त भूिपूवथ सैतनक द्वारा वायुसैतनक ट्रेड परीक्षा में पास होने का अांक
पत्र है र्जो REB (SZ) TAMBARAM द्वारा र्जारी तकया
गया है"

8. The report dated 9.6.2014 of
Secretary Secondary Education was neither
placed on record by the respondents nor it
was earlier supplied to the petitioner.

9.
The
petitioner
challenged
termination order dated 1.10.2014 in a Writ
Petition No.58697 of 2014 before this
Court, which was disposed of by an order
dated 14.3.2018, with a liberty to file an
appeal before Secretary, Basic Shiksha
Parishad.

10. Accordingly, petitioner preferred
an Appeal. The Appeal was rejected vide
order dated 20.3.2016 and subsequently a
representation was rejected by an order
1082 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
dated
23.10.2018.
Relevant
part
is
reproduced hereinafter:

"प्रकरण के अनुशीलन से थपष्ट है तक याची श्री बन्द्ना
लाल की तनयुतक्त पररषदीय प्राितमक तवद्यालय में सहायक अध्यापक
के पद पर हुई िी। िदोपरान्द्ि तर्जला बेतसक तशक्षा अतिकारी द्वारा श्री
बन्द्ना लाल की सेवायें समाप्त कर दी गयी, तर्जसके तवरूद्ध श्री बन्द्ना
लाल द्वारा प्रत्यावेदन प्रथिुि तकया गया है।

श्री बन्द्ना लाल की तनयुतक्त पररषदीय प्राितमक
तवद्यालय में सहायक अध्यापक के पद पर होने के पश्चाि तर्जला
बेतसक तशक्षा अतिकारी द्वारा श्री बन्द्ना लाल के शैतक्षक प्रमाण पत्रों
का सत्यापन कराया गया। इसी िम में तर्जला बेतसक तशक्षा
अतिकारी ने उक्त अांक पत्र को वायुसेवा मुख्यालय नई तदजली से
सत्यापन हेिु प्रेतषि तकया गया। वायु सेना द्वारा अवगि कराया गया
तक "सांलग्न अांक पत्र डण्ड्टरमीतडएट अांक पत्र नहीं है। यह अांक पत्र
उक्त भूिपूवथ सैतनक द्वारा वायु सेना ट्रेड परीक्षा में पास होने का अांक
पत्र है र्जो तवभाग द्वारा र्जारी तकया गया है।" पुनः तर्जला बेतसक
तशक्षा अतिकारी इलाहाबाद द्वारा श्री बन्द्ना लाल से सम्बतन्द्िि
शैतक्षक तववरण को कायाथलय के पत्राांक तशतवर/1985/201415 तदनाांक 09.05.2014 द्वारा रातचव माध्यतमक तशक्षा पररषद
उ०प्र० इलाहाबाद को प्रेतषि कर शैतक्षक प्रमाण पत्रों की समकक्षिा
के सम्बन्द्ि में पृच्िा की गयी। माध्यतमक तशक्षा पररषद द्वारा
कायाथलय के पत्राांक पररषद-9/146 तदनाांक 09.06.2014 द्वारा
सूतचि तकया गया तक भारिीय वायु सेना द्वारा र्जारी उक्त प्रमाण पत्र
पररषद की इण्ड्टरमीतडएट परीक्षा के समकक्ष मान्द्य नहीं है। इस
आिार पर तर्जला बेतसक तशक्षा अतिकारी इलाहाबाद द्वारा कायाथलय
के पत्राक 667/2014-15 तदनाांक 01.10.2014 द्वारा श्री
बन्द्ना लाल की सेवायें समाप्त कर दी गयी।

इस सम्बन्द्ि में यह भी उजलेखनीय है तक श्री बन्द्ना
लाल द्वारा पूवथ में पररषद कायाथलय में तदनाांक 04.01.2016 को
सेवा समातप्त के तवरुद्ध अपील प्रथिुि की गयी िी। उक्त अपील का
तनथिारण पररषद कायाथलय के पत्राांक बे०तश०प०/2187376/2015-16 तदनाांक 10.03.2016 द्वारा तकया गया िा।
विथमान में श्री बन्द्ना लाल द्वारा कोई नवीन िथ्य नहीं प्रथिुि तकये
गये हैं। ऐसी तथिति में तर्जला बेतसक तशक्षा अतिकारी इलाहाबाद
द्वारा तनगथि सेवा समातप्त आदेश सांख्या 667/2014-15 तदनाांक
01.10.2014 में तकसी प्रकार के पररविथन की आवश्कयकिा नहीं
है।
तनणथय

उपरोक्तानुसार श्री बन्द्ना लाल पूवथ सहायक अध्यापक
तसपौवा, तव०ख० कोराव र्जनपद इलाहाबाद द्वारा प्रथिुि प्रत्यावेदन
तनरथि करिे हुए उपरोक्तानुसार तनथिाररि तकया र्जािा है।"

11. As referred above, the appeal as
well as representation was dismissed on
basis of two report dated 20.2.2014
(available on record) and dated 9.6.2014
(not available on record).

12. Learned Amicus Curaie submitted
that I.A.F. Examination Certificate is
equivalent to Intermediate and placed
reliance on following documents and
judgment:

(i) A Circular dated 28.4.1992
issued by Secretary, State of U.P. addressed
to all the Secretaries (Annexed along with
Appeal). For reference same is reproduced
in its entirety:

"उपरोक्त तवषयक भारि सरकार की तवज्ञतप्त
सां:15012/8/82-थिापना (डी) तदनाांक 12 िरवरी, 1986
ििा भूिपूवथ सैतनक पुनवाथस कायाथन्द्वयन सतमति के प्रथिावों पर
सम्यक तवचारोपरान्द्ि शासन द्वारा तनम्नतलतखि तनणथय तलये गये हैं :-

(1) ऐसे भूतपूिव सैधनक, जो मैट्रीकुलेट िों तर्ा
इधडडयन स्पेशल आमी सटीधिकेट आि एजूकेशन या नौ
सेना/िायु सेना में समकक्षीय सटीधिकेट प्राप्त धकये िों तर्ा
संघ की सशस्त्र सेिा में कम से कम 15 िर्व की सेिा पूरी कर
ली िो, को उनके धलए आरधक्षत धसधिल पदों के समूि 'ग"
की उन सेिाओं/पदों के धलये अिव माना जायेगा, धजसके धलये
न्यूनतम शैधक्षक अिवता स्नातक धनिावररत िो, परन्तु जिां उनके
धलये तकनीकी या व्यािसाधयक कायव अनुभि अधनिायव न िो
या जिां गैर तकनीकी व्यािसाधयक कायव अनुभि अधनिायव िो
और धनयुधक्त प्राधिकारी का सन्तोर् िो जाय धक ऐसे भूतपूिव
सैधनक अल्प प्रधशक्षण प्राप्त करने के उपरान्त अपने दाधयत्िों
का धनिविन कर सकते िैं।

(2) भूिपूवथ सैतनकों के तलये आरतक्षि तसतवल सेवा
के समूह "ग" व "घ" के ऐसे पदों, तर्जनके तलए न्द्यूनिम् शैतक्षक
अहथिा मैट्रीक््‌लेशन तनिाथररि हो, तनयुतक्त प्रातिकारी अपने थवतववेक
से ऐसे भूिपूवथ सैतनकों को न्द्यूनिम् शैतक्षक अहथिा से िूट प्रदान कर
सकिे हैं, तर्जन्द्होंने इतण्ड्डयन आमी क्लास-1 परीक्षा या उसके
समकक्षीय नौ सेना या वायु सेना की परीक्षा उत्तीणथ कर ली हो और
सांघ की सशस्त्र सेवा में कम से कम 15 वषथ की सेवा पूरी कर ली
हो और अन्द्यिा कायथ अनुभव एवां अहथिाओां के आिार पर उन्द्हें उक्त
पद के दातयत्वों के तनवथहन के तलए उपयुक्त समझा र्जाय।
5 All. Banna Lal Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
1083

(3) यतद भूिपूवथ सैतनक समूह "ग" व "घ" के पदों
के तवरूद्ध तनिाथररि सीमा िक चयतनि न हो सकें िो दक्षिा को
कुप्रभातवि तकये बगैर सामान्द्य मापदण्ड्ड को इस सीमा िक तशतिक
तकया र्जा सकिा है, तर्जससे आरक्षण का कोटा पूरा हो र्जाये।

2. कृपया उपरोक्त तनणथयों से अपने अिीनथि समथि
तनयुतक्त प्रातिकाररयों को अवगि कराने का कष्ट करें।

भवदीय

ओ०पी० आयथ, सतचव।"

(ii) A Circular issued by the
Ministry of Human Resource Development
dated 23.8.2017 and its relevant part is
mentioned hereinafter:

"This
Ministry
has
received
several
representations
on
the
determination
of
equivalency
of
qualifications in respect of personnel
hailing from Ex- servicemen category. It
was requested to clarify whether an Ex-
serviceman who is a matriculate and
possessing Indian army Special Certificate
of Education or its equivalent certificates
in the navy or Air Force and has put in not
less than 15 years of service are issued
with a Graduation Certificate for reemployment purpose as equivalent to
higher secondary with 50% Marks.

2. this matter has been examined
in light of various provisions of the Right of
Children
to
free
and
Compulsory
Education
(RTE)
Act
2009
DOPTs
notification dated 12 February, 1986.
NCTE
notification
on
minimum
qualifications
of
teachers
and
recommendations of Expert Committee as
formed by NCTE. The recommendations of
the expert committee of NCTE vide letter
No-1769/NCTE/DGR/RES-8
dated
1st
December, 2014 is reproduced as below.

"An Ex- Servicemen who is
Matriculate and possessing Indian Army
Special Certificate of Education or the
Corresponding certificate in the Navy and
Air Force and has put in not less than 15
years service in the Armed Forces has
been issued Corporal Certificate of Indian
Air Force under Scheme - 'A' should be
treated as also having qualified 10+2 with
50% Marks (The minimum eligibility
qualification programme through ODL
conducted by any institution providing
training for untrained in service teachers
working in Schools in accordance with
approval of NCTE). It will enable the
untrained in-service primary teachers
from ex-servicemen category to undergo
D.EL.Ed
Programme
through
ODL
Mode"

3- it has been decided to accept
the above recommendations of the Expert
Committee of NCTЕ.

4- This issues with the approval
of Hon'ble Minister of Human Resource
Development."

(iii) A Judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Ram Lal
Srivastava Vs State Of U.P. And Others,
Neutral Citation No. 2019:AHC:205812
and
its
relevant
part
is
mentioned
hereinafter:

"
In
the
present
matter,
admittedly
the
petitioner
has
been
accorded an appointment as Assistant
Teacher on the basis of his qualification
as Graduation, B.Ed. and Special BTC2004. Therefore, the objection so raised by
Shri B.P. Singh, appearing for the District
Basic Education Officer, Azamgarh at this
belated stage, whether his departmental
examination
known
as
'Corporal
Education
Test'
(CPL
EDN)
dated
4.12.1980 conducted by the Indian Air
Force, is valid or having the equivalence
to Intermediate conducted by U.P. Board
of High School and Intermediate, would
have no meaning at all. Accordingly, the
said objection is unfounded and without
any basis."

(iv) The IAF Education certificate
itself specified that it has been recognized
1084 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
as
equivalent
to
Regular
Secondary
Examination though only for purpose of
higher studies and name of University is
also mentioned. Relevant part of it is
mentioned hereinafter:

"An Ex- Servicemen who is
Matriculate and possessing Indian Army
Special Certificate of Education or the
Corresponding certificate in the Navy and
Air Force and has put in not less than 15
years service in the Armed Forces has
been issued Corporal Certificate of Indian
Air Force under Scheme - 'A' should be
treated as also having qualified 10+2 with
50% Marks (The minimum eligibility
qualification programme through ODL
conducted by any institution providing
training for untrained in service teachers
working in Schools in accordance with
approval of NCTE). It will enable the
untrained in-service primary teachers
from ex-servicemen category to undergo
D.EL.Ed
Programme
through
ODL
Mode"

(v) On basis of said certificate,
petitioner has passed Graduation, B.ED and
BTC Training and no objection was ever
raised.

13. Learned counsel for respondents
has supported the impugned order and
referred relevant part of impugned order
that since Directorate of Veteran Air Head
Quarter has not disputed equivalence,
therefore, there was no illegality in the
impugned order.

14. Heard learned counsel for the
parties and perused the records.

15. There is no dispute that petitioner
has passed IAF Education Certificate from
Air Force on its basis he has passed
graduation and after his retirement he has
also passed B.ED and BTC and those
degrees and certificates still hold good and
on its basis he was appointed as an
Assistant Teacher.

16. A dispute whether IAF Education
Certificate is equivalent to Intermediate
was decided in negative by the concerned
respondent on the basis of two reports
dated 20.2.2014 (available on record) and
9.6.2014 (not available on record).

17. The report dated 20.2.2014 only
states that mark sheet of IAF Education
certificate
is
not
a
mark
sheet
of
Intermediate Examination. No reference
was made whether it was equivalent to
Intermediate or not, therefore, only on its
basis, it would not be appropriate to deny
equivalence, specifically ignoring other
documents. So far as other report dated
9.6.2014 is concerned, being not on record,
therefore, Court is not aware about its
contents.

18. As referred above, there are more
than one documents, which indicates
equivalence of IAF Education Certificate
with Intermediate such as circular dated
28.4.1992, circular dated 23.8.2017 as well
as judgment of Ram Lal Srivastava (supra),
but all such documents were not taken note
of by respondents, despite circulars were
filed along with the appeal.

19. I have carefully perused contents
of above referred circulars and Ram Lal
Srivastava (supra), that IAF Education
Certificate is equivalent to Intermediate,
therefore, reason assigned in the impugned
order are erroneous and is liable to be setaside.

20. Now Court takes note that
petitioner is at present aged about 67 years
and he has worked as an Assistant Teacher
5 All. Puran Singh Vs. District Judge Lucknow & Ors.
1085
from 1.8.2013 to 30.9.2014 without salary.
Therefore, even the impugned order is setaside, Court cannot direct to appoint him as
Assistant Teacher. He has not worked since
2014 till he has reached the age of
superannuation i.e. 62 years (2019) i.e. 5 to
6 years. Meanwhile, he has pursued his
L.L.B. Degree and now he is a practising
Advocate of this Court. The period for
which he has not worked will be considered
as "No work No Pay".

21. In the aforesaid circumstances and
in the interest of justice, this writ petition is
disposed of with following directions:

(a)
Impugned
orders
dated
1.10.2014, 10.3.2016 and 23.10.2018 are
set-aside.

(b) Petitioner is entitled for
payment of salary from 1.8.2013 to
30.9.2014, when undisputedly, he has
worked and his salary for said period shall
be paid within a period of 8 weeks.

(c) No direction for reinstatement
even on notional basis could be passed.

(d)
A
lump
sum
compensation/cost is determined as Rs.2.5
lakhs to be paid by respondents within 12
weeks to the petitioner.

(e) Mr. Yatindra, learned Amicus
Curaie has assisted the Court in a very
proper manner and for that High Court
Legal, Services Committee, Allahabad will
pay Rs.5500/ to him within four weeks.
----------
(2025) 5 ILRA 1085
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: LUCKNOW 07.05.2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Writ-A No. 1000115 of 2014
Puran Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
District Judge Lucknow & Ors.
 ...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:
Heera Lal Srivastava, Amit Jaiswal, Apoorva
Tewari

Counsel for the Respondents:
U.N. Misra, Ramesh Chandra Pathak

A. Tenancy Law - UP Urban Buildings
(Regulation of Letting, Rent &Eviction)
Act, 1972 - Section 30 (1) - Scope of
power - Deposit of rent - No adjudication
on relationship of landlord and tenant,
how far vitiate the impugned order - Held,
S.
30
itself
does
not
confer
any
adjudictory powers upon the Munsif for
deciding the relationship of landlord and
tenant,
otherwise
the
use
of
word
'claiming to be tenant' would be of no
purpose - No power of adjudication have
been granted to the Munsif by virtue of S.
30 of the Act and even if the deposit is
made by a person claiming himself to be a
tenant, and is actually not a tenant, the
benefit of deposit u/s 30 would clearly not
be available to him in suitable proceedings
initiated by the landlord and contested by
the tenant/ person in occupation and not
a tenant. (Para 11 and 13)
Writ petition dismissed. (E-1)
List of Cases cited:
1. M/s S. Chand & Co. Vs IInd A.D.J.; 1985 (1)
ARC 251
2. Moolchand Motuman Tekwani Vs A.D.J.; 1985
(2) ARC 142
3. St. Jones School Vs Special Judge, E.C. Act;
1999 (1) ARC 588
4. Chatur Mohan & ors. Vs Ram Behari Dixit;
1964 All LJ 256
5. Anwar Ali Vs A.D.J.; 2002 (2) ARC 562
6. Rajendra Kumar Karnwal Vs Smt. Kailash
Garg; 2005(4) AWC 3858J