# concerned appointing authority

- **Citation:** Circular Letter No. 35/Ve-4/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1973-12-21
- **Case number:** Circular Letter No. 35/Ve-4/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/concerned-appointing-authority-162225
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

153
appropriate employment may be offered under the direction of the High Court, by the
concerned appointing authority
The entire re-employment above indicated, should be on ad-hoc basis and subject
to filling the vacancies in concerned judgeship on regular basis in accordance with rules
where the re-employed ad-hoc employees may if necessary, be given an opportunity to
compete after giving relaxation in the matter of age etc.
It has been directed that rehabilitation of such persons by re-ad hoc employment
against vacancies in ministerial and inferior establishment of the Districts Judgships may
be considered provided if prior approval of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice as is required
under Circular Letter No. 35/Ve-4/Admn. (D), dated 27.5.1992 and Circular Letter No.
9/VIIb-104/Admn. (D), dated 29th April, 1998, is accorded.
It has been also resolved that no advertisement be issued as the persons to be
emoloyed are already on the list. Further resolved that no reservation regarding caste etc.
be made as the persons are already employed.
I am, therefore, directed to communicate you the aforesaid directions of the court
for strict compliance.
[3] DYING IN HARNESS
Family member of a government servent dying in harness
C.L. No. 63/Ve-4 dated 26th April, 1974
Directions contained in G.O, no, 6/12/1973-Niyukti-4 dated December 21, 1973
regarding employment of the members of the family of a government servant dying in
harness should be followed.
C.L. No. 26/Admn.(D) Section dated July 4, 1995
Directions regarding appointment under Dying in Harness Rules, 1974
I am directed to say that the Court has been pleased to order that the application of
a dependant of an employee who died in harness, shall be considered for appointment in
the district where he/she had last served or last resided.
The Court has further taken a decision that regarding relaxation in upper age limit
for appointment Hon‟ble the Chief Justice may exercise his discretion keeping in view
the facts and circumstances of each case.
C.L. No. 93/Ve-4/Admn. (D) Section dated October 3, 1994
Appointment of dependants of employees dying in harness under the Uttar Pradesh
Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants, Dying in Harness Rules, 1974
I am directed to say that certain guidelines have been prescribed by the Hon‟ble
the Supreme Court of India in regard to the claims for appointment under the Dying in
Harness Rules on compassionate grounds in SLP No. 10504 of 1993* Umesh Kumar
Nagpal v. State of Haryana and others) connected with SLPs Nos. 2385 of 1994 (Anil
Malik v. State of Haryana). A copy of the judgment delivered on May 4, 1994 is enclosed

* The Judgement of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court referred in this CL has been reported in 1994 (4) SCC 138