# confirmation of the employees are not made in due course in accordance with the Rules

- **Citation:** circular letter No.49/Ve-60/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1985-09-21
- **Case number:** circular letter No.49/Ve-60/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/confirmation-of-the-employees-are-not-made-in-due-course-in-accordance-with-the-162304
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

191
confirmation of the employees are not made in due course in accordance with the Rules.
This state of affairs at times becomes cause of grievance to many giving rise to
representations to the High Court. In this connection reference may be made to the
circular letter No.49/Ve-60/Admn. (D) dated September 21, 1985 relating to the demands
of the U.P. Civil Courts Employees‟ Association where in one of the directions issued
was to consider the matters of confirmation of temporary employees in case permanent
vacancies are available in your Judgeship. But compliance of that direction does not
appear to have been made so far.
It is now expedient that the Class III and Class IV employees should be confirmed
in accordance with the Rules within two months and the seniority of the employees of
both the classes should be determined within three months.
I am, therefore, to ask you to confirm the Class III and Class IV employees in
accordance with the Rules within two months and determine the seniority of the
employees of both the classes within three months.
I am further to ask you to submit the compliance report of the aforesaid directions
to the Court giving details on the proforma attached herewith.
The above directions may kindly be followed strictly.
Seniority list of Class III/Class IV employees of.........Judgeship.
SI..No.
Name of
Employee
Date
of
Appointment
Nature
of
Appointment
Grade/Scale
of Pay
Date
of
Probation
Date
of
Confirmation
Remarks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

C.L. No. 36/VIC-1 dated 28 May, 1992
Preparation of list of Candidates of Class IV employees in terms of existing, U.P.
Subordinate Civil Courts Inferior Establishment Rules, 1955
I am directed to say that the Government of Uttar Pradesh has desired to bring
changes in the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Civil Courts Inferior Establishment Rules, 1955
by replacing the same by the "Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Courts Group „D‟ Services
Rules, 1986", which are still under consideration by the High Court and Government of
Uttar Pradesh. However, till finalisation of the U.P. Subordinate Courts Group „D‟
Services Rules, 1986, the recruitment in Class IV services of the Judgeship shall be
governed by the existing U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Inferior Establishment Rules,
1955.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to ensure compliance as stated above.
C.L. No. 60/Ve-31/Admn. (D) dated 14 October, 1993
Preparation of gradation list of various categories of the Civil Court employees
I am directed to request you to take immediate steps to prepare gradation list of
various categories of employees of your Judgeship.
I am further to add that while preparing the gradation list it is to be kept in mind
that the principle of reservation is applicable only to initial appointments and not at the
stage of promotion and interse seniority of the officials is to be fixed according to Rule
14 of the U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 and Rule
13 of U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Inferior Establishment Rules, 1955 and not
according to the list prepared as a result of the roster system.