# correspondence with the Accountant General, U.P., Allahabad

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 51
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1965-03-26
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 51
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/correspondence-with-the-accountant-general-u-p-allahabad-162837
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

46
C.L. No. 51 dated 6th April, 1971
Correct and complete name of judicial officers should be mentioned in all
correspondence with the Accountant General, U.P., Allahabad.
(vi)
Correspondence with inspectors of stamps
G.L. No. 27/67-3 dated 13th May, 1935
Correspondence in matters arising out of the inspection notes of Inspector of
Stamps regarding deficiency of court-fees should not be carried on by Munsarims. It is
the duty of the presiding officer of the court concerned to deal personally with such
correspondence, and all letters in this connection should be issued under his signature.
(vii)
Correspondence with soldiers
C.L. No. 36/VI-f-50 dated 21st May, 1966
All correspondence in connection with Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925 in
respect of courts in the State of Uttar Pradesh should be round through the G.O.C.-in-C,
Central Command (Vide Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, letter no. F.
19/24/65-J-II, dated March 26, 1965).
(viii) Replies to Assembly questions
G.L. No. 51/30-16(2) dated 28th November, 1938, reaffirmed by
C.L. No. 30/X-f-2 dated 13th April, 1949

The attention of District Judges is drawn to G.O.No. F.67/XX-1938, dated April
21, 1938 relating to the procedure about furnishing draft replies to Council and Assembly
Questions. In no circumstances whatsoever are replies to be sent direct to Government.
All replies must go through the Court.
C.L. No. 9/X-f-2 dated 20th January, 1966

In case of extreme urgency and where the communication regarding replies to
Assembly and Council Questions has directly been addressed to the District Judges, they
are advised to follow the instruction as laid down in G.O. No. 1046-M/XX-E-18-54,
dated December 15, 1954 and send the reply direct to Government under intimation to
the Court.
C.L. No. 85/X-f-2 dated 23rd August, 1969

Replies to Parliament questions containing classified information may either be
transmitted as a telegram or through post when time permits. The officer responsible for
originating a radiogram in reply to a Parliament question must ensure that its
transmission over the radio does not constitute breach of security.
(ix)
Communication with Pakistan
C.L. No. 33/X f-20 dated 3rd November, 1947

The above-noted letter deals with the procedure to be observed in regard to
communications with Pakistan and points out that there shall ordinarily be no
communication between subordinate authorities in the two countries except where