# Court in Ved Prakash Tripathi v. State of

- **Citation:** (2001) 2 ILRA 149
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2001-02-20
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/court-in-ved-prakash-tripathi-v-state-of-39837
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES [2001

149
on a Division Bench decision of this
Court in Ved Prakash Tripathi vs. State of
U.P. and others, Civil Misc. Writ Petition
No.
32077
of
2000,
decided
on
20.12.2000. In our opinion, the ratio of
that decision will apply to the facts of the
present case. The only difference between
that case and the present case is that in
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 32077 of
2000 four vacancies remained on account
of non-joining of four selected persons,
whereas in the present case all the persons
selected joined but five persons later
resigned within one year of the life of the
panel. In our opinion, this distinction will
make no difference and hence the ratio of
the decision of Ved Prakash Tripathi's
case will apply to this case also. Hence
we issue a mandamus to the U.P. Public
Service
Commission,
Allahabad
to
recommend the names of five persons in
accordance with merit as per the select list
and those, person will be appointed
forthwith.

The writ petition is, accordingly
allowed.

25,*,1$/ -85
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
,6',&7,21
&5,0,1$/ 6,'(
&5,0,1$/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21·%/( 0.$7-8 -
7+( +21·%/( 0.$7-8 -
7+( +21·%/( 2 %+$77 -
7+( +21·%/( 2 %+$77 -

&UO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

6KUL 3UDNDVK 6LQJK DQRWKHU«3HWLWLRQHU
9HUVXV
6WDWH RI 83 WKURXJK 6XSHULQWHQGHQW RI
3ROLFH DQG RWKHUV
«5HVSRQGHQWV

&RXQVHO IRU WKH 3HWLWLRQHU
6KUL =DIDU $EEDG
&RXQVHO IRU WKH 5HVSRQGHQWV
$*$
&RQVWLWXWLRQ RI ,QGLD $UWLFOH ± D
SHUXVDO RI WKH ),5 VKRZV WKDW WKH
DOOHJDWLRQV DUH WKDW WKH SHWLWLRQHU 1R
9LMD\
3UDWDS
6LQJK
LV
UXQQLQJ
DQ
DOOHJHGO\ QRQH[LVWHQW 6FKRRO DORQJZLWK
KLV VRQ 3HWLWLRQHU 1R 6KUL 3UDNDVK
6LQJK
DQG
WKH\
KDYH
HPEH]]OHG
5V RI WKH 6FKRORUVKLS IHH RI
6FKHGXOHG FDVWH VWXGHQWV KHOG LQ SDUD

By the Court

1. Heard learned counsel for the
Petitioner
and
learned
Government
Counsel.

2. This case discloses a shocking
state of affairs as it shows what is
happening in our country in large scale.

3. The Petitioner has challenged the
impugned
F.I.R.
dated
20.2.2001
Annexure 1 to the writ Petition in case
crime no. 43 of 2001 under Section 467,
468, 471, 420, 409 I.P.C. police station
Meh Nagar, district Azamgarh. The
aforesaid F.I.R. reads as follows:

"

% ( ‚ žo ‚ ¡9 o ‘ · 9 % (o‚ K ¡Y % ( … © 9 · 0 I

^ M % ( ¥}o % ( ¥}o % ( ‘ %

 ( ¥}o % (

$^ ( ž …/

/

 ¡Q[ % (

O [ Y‚ ) O [ · »F[ 0 … 9 · 0 I ‹ 0 L % (…[ F¿ ¡% (

 ¡9 o ¡‹ W o ‚ ¡[ … ©) % ( % ( ‚ žo ‚ 9 · 0 I % (» ^ M

Œ (· % ( 8 M ‹ ¶ ¡N /

 ¡Q[ % (

X …

 J © 0 » ¡‹ [Q ¢‘ F · ¡‹ … · ^ … L O ‘ F ©Q

…3 [ O ¢‘ F · ¡‹ % ( Q ©^ … 9 · 0 I % (»

 [ ‘ ± ¡6 L 9 ¡L % (» 8 M 1⁄4 % ( © ‘ ±6 © _ ¡L F‘L ) ¡…L

% (…L » F$ Y »F‘L ) ¡…L % (» % ( ‚ žo ‚ % ( » ^ o }Y

% (…

‚ © 0 ‚ © O ©
 ¡9 ‘ % (» Y … ^ … ^ … »% 'L ¡‹ W o ‚

% ( » Œ (·  ‚ ± ^ © ž ¢‘ F ^ … - L ‘ 

 · 1⁄4 L O ‘  · -‚  - E % (3 …

 9 · 0 I · 1⁄4 - L ‘  · 1⁄4 | »9 © 0 ‚ © O ©

- KE
 ¡‹ % ( ‘

 ¡Y % ( … ©
 ¡} o ¡Q‚
0 9
 ^

 ¡9 o ¡Y % ( … © ¡[ … ©) % ( 9 · 0 I ‘ » ^ … »% 'L Q »[ 1⁄4

 ¡‹ W o ‚ ¥‘L L‹ F ©[ ^ ‚ » 0 ‚ »
 ^ … »% 'L ¡‹ W o ‚ 1⁄4 · 1⁄4
2All] Chandi Prasad and others V. The Addl..District & Sessions Judge and others

150

‘ » 0 » ¡‹ [Q ¢‘ F · ¡‹
… · ^ … % (» L O % ( ¡O L

_ Y [ 6 ‚ ž

J © ¡‹ 9 ‚ _ L ^ ¢‘ F L O [ % ( ^ ¡…6 ‚

} À% ( · 1⁄4 J © _ % (  ¢‘ F ^ M J © ¡ ‹ ^ ±9 [ ¢‘ F

 ¡[ ‹ ‘ © 2 ^ » ¢‘ F^ … 9 [ ^ Q 9 · 0 I X … ¡% (‚

0 ‚ F¿
 ‘ © _ % ( …  F ©Q …3 [ O ¢‘ F · ¡‹

% ( … ©^ …

 9 · 0 I L O % ( ¡O L _ Y [ 6 ‚ ž ‘‹ ‚  J ©

_ % (  ¢‘ F FÀ
 ¡9 [ % ( ^ ¡…6 ‚ · -‚ E % (3 … · 1⁄4 J ©

 3‚ ‹ …
‚ Q‹
 ¡[ ‹ ‘ ©
E% (E ¿…
^ »
F ¡^ (9 ^ …

 9 · 0 I [ » ¡Q‚ F¿
 6 ±› ¡% ( ^ … »% 'L Q »[ 1⁄4 ¡‹ W o ‚

 ¥‘L L‹ F

 ©[ FÀ L ^ … »% 'L Q »[ 1⁄4 %‚ ¥% 'L ‚ 1⁄4 X … _ ^L

 ¡% (‚ Y [ … ¡ Œ (·  ‡Ë L O % (o

 ¡· o % (… ‡Ë % ( ^ M 1⁄4 _ ^ M 1⁄4 % (» Y … ^ M

 ¡% (‚ 0 ‚ F¿
 L O L L% ( o ©[ ¡9 o ¡‹ W o ‚

 ¡[ … ©) % (

 9 · 0 I [ % (» ^ @o ‘ F ‚ % ( % (» ¡‹ ‡ËU

_ O · ‘ ±6 [ ¡…^ »@ž Q9 ž % (… ¡‹ ¡Y % ( % ( ‚ ž‹ F © % (…[ »

% ( % („@ % (…1⁄4
 ‘ ·} ¥[Y L ¡Y % ( ¡…‚ 1⁄4 % ( © 9 ›6 -‚

} À% ( L O ^ » ¡^ (‘ ‘ » _ ^L L O J © Y‚ ‹ … ‚ Q‹

% ( } ‚ [ L O ¡[ … ©) % ( % ( ‚ žo ‚ ‘ » _ ^L _ ¡L _ ^ M 1⁄4

% ( © 8 ‚ _ ¡L ‘ o 0[ % (… ^ % (» ^ ‘ _ » ¡„ L % ( © 9

…F © F¿
 ‘ o 0[ % ( ^ … »% 'L [ ‘ … ^ [[ » | ‹ Q ©‚

$‘ E © 2 »9 © ^ a[ ©‚
 …^ © 

% 'o ¡9 o

‘ · 9 % (o‚ K ¡Y % ( … © 9 · 0 I ^ ¶„a % ([ ‘ -‚

 ‚ )

 ¡Q[ % ("

4. A perusal of the F.I.R. shows that
the allegations are that petitioner no. 2
Vijay Pratap Singh is running an allegedly
non-existent school alongwith his son,
petitioner no. 1 Shri Prakash Singh and
they have embezzled Rs.1,28,000/- of the
scholarship
fee
of
scheduled
caste
students. It is shocking that though there
is no school in existence yet the
scholarship funds are being given to a
non-existent school, and it is only after an
enquiry
by
the
B.D.O.,
Bildiaganj,
A.D.M. Azamgarh and the D.I.O.S. that
this great fraud was discovered. What
'tehalka' type scandles are happening at
the national level mini tehalka scandals in
thousands of cases are accurrind at the
lower level. This is not an isolated case
but a large number of cases are coming
before this Court against Principals and
teachers
etc.
who
embezzled
the
scholarship fees and other school funds.
The principals and teachers are supposed
to be ideals for the students but today they
are often regarded as thieves. This just
shows the level of degradation to which
this country has sunk.

5. We are not inclined to interfere in
this matter as the allegations in the F.I.R.
certainly discloses committing of an
offence.
The
Petition
is
dismissed.
However the observation made herein
will not influance the court hearings the
bail application or the trail.

6. We were inclined to pass a
detailed direction to the Chief Secretary to
hold
a
thorough
enquiry
into
the
allegations where the funds were issued to
non-existent institutions and where the
school fees, funds etc. were embezzled by
the Principals, managers or teachers of the
educational
institution
but
we
are
informed by Sri Arvind Tripathi learned
Addl. Govt. Advocate that in another writ
Petition such enquiry has already been
ordered by another bench of the court and
the enquiry is still going on. Hence it is
not necessary to pass a similar order for
holding enquiry in the case.

25,*,1$/ -
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
85,6',&7,21
&,9,/ 6,'(
&,9,/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21·%/( 68'+,5 1$5$,1 -
7+( +21·%/( 68'+,5 1$5$,1 -

&LYLO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

&KDQGL 3UDVDG DQG RWKHUV
«3HWLWLRQHU
9HUVXV
7KH
$GGLWLRQDO
'LVWULFW
DQG
6HVVLRQV
-XGJH DQG RWKHUV
«5HVSRQGHQWV