# delays in handing over the charge without the prior permission of the Court, the District

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 56/IVe-82/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1951-01-23
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 56/IVe-82/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/delays-in-handing-over-the-charge-without-the-prior-permission-of-the-court-the-162052
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

71
delays in handing over the charge without the prior permission of the Court, the District
Judge should bring this fact to the notice of the Court.
If an officer proceeds on leave after taking over charge at a station, the District
Judge should not permit him to avail of the leave in anticipation of sanction unless he
feels that there are compelling circumstances to do so. He should forward the leave
application with a note of the fact whether or not the officer‟s need for taking leave is
genuine and also if necessary, that he has permitted the officer to avail of the leave in
anticipation of sanction. In the absence of the recommendation of the District Judge, the
leave applied for by the officer shall be liable to be refused.
C.L. No. 56/IVe-82/Admn. (A) dated 31st August, 1984
The Officers on transfer should take over at the station of their posting in
accordance with the orders of their transfer issued by the Court from time to time and, in
the event of their failure to do so, disciplinary action would follow against them.
(v) Charge certificate
C.L. No. 3/IVf-54 dated 18th January, 1955
Charge certificates before being sent to Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh, must be
signed both by the relieving and relieved Officers and countersigned.
Charge certificates in respect of District Judges shall be countersigned by the
Registrar of the High Court and those in respect of other Judicial Officers by the District
Judge concerned.
C.L. No. 8 dated 27th January, 1961
The instructions contained in paragraph 128 of the M.G.Os.and G.O. No. A-120/IIA-1951, dated January 23, 1951, should be strictly followed and it should be ensured that
the charge certificates are despatched promptly to the Appointment (A)* (* Redesignated
as Appointment Section - 34, vide the Business of Uttar Pradesh (Allocation) Rules,
1975)Department of the Government with the names and designation of the Officers
typed on them in block letters.
Provisions of Paragraph 115 of the Financial Handbook, Volume V (Part I) for
submission of charge certificates and paragraph 17(i) of Financial Handbook, Volume II
(Parts II to IV), regarding drawals without authority of the A.G., U.P., should be strictly
complied with.
C.L. No. 32/IV/Admn. (A) dated 19th March, 1980
While signing charge certificates, the Officers should legibly sign their full names
and should not put down their initials only.
C.L. No. 18/95, dated 8th May, 1995
Charge Certificate of Judicial Officers
The Computer Centre of the High Court has been functioning for last three years
and has been maintaining the posting details of the Judicial Officers. The exact date of
the handing and taking over the charge of a particular post is also being entered in the
computer. The copy of the charge certificate sent to the High Court is being dealt by the
72
Deputy Registrar (Services) in the High Court. The difficulty is being felt in obtaining
this copy from the office of Deputy Registrar (Services) which also needs this record very
often. It has also been observed that many charge certificates do not mention the name of
the officer handing or taking over the charge. Illegible initials do not help in this matter.
This makes it desirable that the full name of the officer be clearly indicated on the charge
certificate. In this connection it has been felt necessary that a copy of the charge
certificate be directly endorsed to Joint Registrar (Computers).
I am, therefore, directed to say that a copy of the charge certificate be henceforth
sent directly to Joint Registrar (Computers), High Court, Allahabad and the charge
certificate should clearly indicate the name of the officer in block capital letters.
(vi)
Appointment of Presiding Officers in the newly created four Special Courts
of Anti Corruption CBI at Lucknow and two Special Courts of Anti
Corruption CBI at Ghaziabad
C.L. No. 417/Main-B/Admin.(A-3) dated 10.1.2011

On the above noted subject, I have been directed to say that Government have
created six more Additional Special Courts of Anti Corruption CBI (i.e. 4 Courts at
Lucknow and 2 Courts at Ghaziabad) vide G.O No. 1532/VII-Nyay-2-2010-167-G/2009,
dated 26.10.2010

I am, therefore, to request you kindly to recommend the name of any four Judicial
Officers of HJS cadre posted in your Judgeship separately for each Special Court, for
their appointment as Presiding Officer in the newly created four Special Courts of Anti
Corruption CBI at Lucknow and two Special Courts of Anti Corruption, CBI at
Ghaziabad, to this Hon‟ble Court by return FAX.
[9]
PAY AND ALLOWANCES
(i)
Special pay
C.L. No. 19/IV-f-82/Admn.(A) dated 20th March, 1984
Special pay @ Rs. 75/- per month is granted with effect from January 1, 1984, as
mentioned in the G.O. No. 6016/II-4-22(21)83, dated 5.1.1984 to all the Munsif-
Magistrates working in courts situated at Tahsil head quarters of the districts in Uttar
Pradesh, provided they reside at the Tahsil head quarter. A certificate to that effect should
be given by the District Judges concerned.
C.L. No. 16/IV-f-82/Admn.(A) dated 31st March, 1984
Dearness allowance should be allowed to Munsif-Magistrates of outlying courts on
the special pay of Rs. 75/- p.m.
(ii)
Dress allowance
C.E. No. 17/IV-f-82/Admn.(A) dated 20th March, 1984
While referring to G.O. No. 52/7-A. Nya./84-Appointment (4) Anu-22(21)/83,
dated January 5, 1984, the Accountant General, III, Uttar Pradesh, G.A.8-Section, is
requested to authorise Special Compensatory Allowance @ Rs. 75/- per month with
effect from 1.1.1984 to all the Officers posted as District Judges, Additional District and