# designations below their initials on judgments

- **Citation:** C.L.No.38/VII-b-40
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1968-04-24
- **Case number:** C.L.No.38/VII-b-40
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/designations-below-their-initials-on-judgments-163923
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

477
C.L.No.38/VII-b-40 dated 24th April, 1968
Presiding officers of Sessions Courts should give their full and proper
designations below their initials on judgments.
 Orders passed in chambers
G.L.No.6/46 dated 15th February, 1939
Interlocutory orders passed by presiding officers in chambers are sometimes not
communicated to parties or their pleaders and this result in their approaching the office
for information about such orders passed in their absence and opens the door to
corruption.

Whenever any judicial orders are passed in chambers, they should invariably be
communicated to the parties or their pleaders and their signatures obtained on the order
sheet or elsewhere where the orders are recorded.
 Judgment in Hindi
C.L.No.60/X-e-5 dated 23rd April, 1974

Under section 272 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and in super session
of all existing notifications in this regard, the language of courts other than the High
Court has been determined as follows:
(1) In respect of judgments and orders passed or made by a court of Magistrate in all
cases in which a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year can
be passed in Hindi (in Devnagri Script);
(2) In respect of judgments and orders passed or made by any court in any case other
than a case referred to in para (i) above- in Hindi (in Devnagri Script) and
English;
(3) In respect of all proceedings other than judgments and orders in any court- in
Hindi (in Devnagri Script).
Injuries to be reproduced
C.L.No. 13/VIb-47 dated 3rd March, 1982
The presiding officers of the criminal courts should invariably reproduce in their
judgments the injuries from the injury reports of the injured persons.
(ii)
 Reservation of
G.L.No. 5176/167-185 dated 26th November, 1925

The court does not desire to lay down any rigid rule but in the great majority of
cases in Munsifs' courts and in a considerable proportion of cases in Civil Judges' courts
it should be possible to deliver judgment either on the same day on which the arguments
are concluded or on the next following day. No officer should ever have more than two or
at most three judgments reserved at the same time. When more than two judgments have
been reserved, an officer should not ordinarily take up another case until he has written
them.