# Dilip Kumar Singh @ Deepu Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors

- **Citation:** (2023) 6 ILRA 947
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2023-05-22
- **Case number:** Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 18302 of 2022
- **Bench:** Anjani Kumar Mishra, Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/dilip-kumar-singh-deepu-singh-v-state-of-u-p-ors-50480
- **Pages:** 2

## Headnote

Civil Law - The Contempt of Courts Act,
1926 - The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971-
Sections
12
&
19-maintainability
of
special appeal-against the order of single

## Text

6 All. Dilip Kumar Singh @ Deepu Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
947
specially when the bald statement made in
the petition stands denied by learned
A.G.A., on the basis of instructions
received by him.

7. The petitioner being an active
member of the gang has indulged in several
anti social activities. Thus, non-compliance
of the provisions of the U.P. Gangsters and
Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Rules,
2021, as contended by counsel for the
petitioner, has no basis.

8.

Where
the
gang-chart
is
recommended and forwarded for approval
without unnecessary delay, it cannot be
deduced that the provisions of the U.P.
Gangsters and Anti Social Activities
(Prevention) Rules, 2021 have not been
complied.

9.

The
main
purpose
for
implementing the said Rules is to provide
transparent
procedure
to
punish
the
Gangsters and to establish an efficient
machinery to prevent anti social activities.

10. In view of the aforesaid facts and
circumstances, the allegations in the FIR
disclose a commission of cognizable
offence.

11. No interference is required. The
writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.
----------
(2023) 6 ILRA 947
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 22.05.2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, J.
THE HON'BLE MS. NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 18302 of 2022
Dilip Kumar Singh @ Deepu Singh
 ...Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. ...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:
Sri Arvind Kumar Upadhyay

Counsel for the Respondents:
G.A., Dharmveer Singh

Criminal Law -Indian Penal Code, 1860 -
Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 409 -
Writ petition- quashing of the FIR lodged
under - civil litigation already sub-judice
before the Provident Fund Commissioner,
Varanasi- criminal prosecution cannot be
thwarted merely because civil proceedings
are
also
maintainable-
criminal
prosecution can still proceed against the
petitioner-Petition dismissed.

HELD:
Considering the aforesaid facts, it cannot be denied
that there is no express bar to the simultaneous
continuance of a criminal proceeding as well as civil
proceedings. Citing the decision rendered by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in (1999) 8 SCC 686 (Trisuns
Chemical Industry Vs Rajesh Agarwal & ors.). It has
been held that criminal prosecution cannot be
thwarted merely because civil proceedings are also
maintainable. Merely because an act has a civil
profile is not sufficient to denude it of its criminal
outfit. Thus, even if the civil proceedings are
subjudice before the Provident Fund Commissioner,
Varanasi, the criminal prosecution can still proceed
against the petitioner.

Petition dismissed. (E-14)

List of Cases cited:

Trisuns Chemical Industry Vs Rajesh Agarwal &
ors., (1999) 8 SCC 686

(Delivered by Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha
Shukla, J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and
perused the record.
948 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES

2. The instant writ petition seeks
quashing of the FIR dated 17.11.2022
giving rise to FIR No. 513 of 2022, under
Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 409 IPC,
Police Station- Kotwali Mau, District-
Mau.

3. The main contention of learned
counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner
is the proprietor of M/s Singh Construction,
Nizamuddinpura, Mau and was awarded
work order as a contractor from theNagar
Palika Parishad, Maunath Bhanjan, Mau for
the
purposes
of
cleaning
14 wards
including Urban Poor settlements and slum
areas from the period 01.04.2017 to
31.03.2018 for which about 275 Safai
Karmcharis were employed.

4. It has further been contended that
the petitioner has been falsely implicated
with the mala fide intention. Adding to the
above, it has been contended that the civil
litigation is already sub-judice before the
Provident Fund Commissioner, Varanasi.

5. Per contra, learned AGA for the
State
has
opposed
the
aforesaid
submissions and has stated that the
petitioner has not deposited the provident
fund amount of Safai Karmcharis and has
produced fake copies of challans/receipts,
resulting in embezzlement of EPF amount
of Rs. 285 employees.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, it
cannot be denied that there is no express
bar to the simultaneous continuance of a
criminal proceeding as well as civil
proceedings. Citing the decision rendered
by Hon'ble Supreme Court in (1999) 8
SCC 686 (Trisuns Chemical Industry Vs.
Rajesh Agarwal & Others). It has been
held that criminal prosecution cannot be
thwarted merely because civil proceedings
are also maintainable. Merely because an
act has a civil profile is not sufficient to
denude it of its criminal outfit.

7. Thus, even if the civil proceedings
are subjudice before the Provident Fund
Commissioner,
Varanasi,
the
criminal
prosecution can still proceed against the
petitioner.

8. Having considered the submissions
advanced by learned counsel for the parties
and from the perusal of records, it is
apparent that the allegations in the FIR do
constitute ingredients of a cognizable
offence.

9. No interference is required.

10. The writ petition is, therefore,
dismissed.
----------
(2023) 6 ILRA 948
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 09.05.2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRS. SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
THE HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.

Special Appeal No. 234 of 2023

Vinod Kumar & Anr. ...Appellants
Versus
Sri Veer Bahadur Yadav & Anr.
 ...Respondents

Counsel for the Appellants:
Sri Shashi Kant

Counsel for the Respondents:

Civil Law - The Contempt of Courts Act,
1926 - The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971-
Sections
12
&
19-maintainability
of
special appeal-against the order of single