# DISOPOSAL OF CASES BY THE FAST TRACK COURTS

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 28/F.T.C
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 2005-08-31
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 28/F.T.C
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/disoposal-of-cases-by-the-fast-track-courts-163974
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

513
34.
DISOPOSAL OF CASES BY THE FAST TRACK COURTS
C.L. No. 28/F.T.C (Cell) Dated: 15th September, 2004

In continuation of Court's Endorsement No. 114/D.R. (S)/2001 dated 15.05.2001,
C.L. No. 24/J.R. (I) dated 25.07.2001, C.L. No. 27/J.R. (I) dated 03.08.2002, C.L. No.
41/2003 dated 29.10.2003 and Letter No. 66/D.R. (S) dated 01.03.2004 on the above
subject, I am directed to say that on consideration, the Court has been pleased to resolve
that such Officer of the Fast Track Court on being short of work should inform the
District Judge. In that case the District Judge concerned is authorized to allot them such
other, work as he deems fit. The standard of disposal regarding cases transferred to such
Fast Track Court would be the same as is applicable to the officers of the regular Court.

I am therefore, to request you that the above decision of Hon'ble Court be
complied with and be informed to concerned officers accordingly.
35.
STRICT COMPLIANCE OF THE DIRECTIONS PASSED BY THE
COURT IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT NO. 33 OF 1999 - STATE OF U.P.
vs. SRI SHASHI KUMAR TYAGI
C.L. No. 42/2004 Dated: 14th October, 2004

In Criminal Contempt No. 33 of 1999- State of U.P. Vs. Sri Shashi Kumar Tyagi,
the Hon'ble Court ( Hon'ble M. Katju, A.C.J. and Hon'ble S. Ambwani, Judge) has taken
a serious view of the matter and expressed its concern wherein the Advocate Sri Shashi
Kumar Tyagi has been found guilty of gross contempt on account of behaving in a most
improper manner in the court of III Addl. Civil Judge, (J.D), Ghaziabad, which was also
most unbecoming of an Advocate and resultantly the Court has awarded punishment
prohibiting him to enter the court compound of District Court, Ghaziabad for one year.

I am, therefore, directed by the Court to send herewith a copy of the order dated
11.10.2004 passed by the Court in Criminal Contempt No. 33 of 1999- State of U.P. vs.
Sri Shashi Kumar Tyagi for your information and strict compliance.
(See for judgment - 2004 (50) ACC 815)
C.L. No. 37/2006; Dated 10th August, 2006
The State Government of Uttar Pradesh vide letter No. 122/VI-Ma-2/2005, dated
01.08.2005 have intimated that reply in response to the notice(s) issued by the State
Human Rights Commission is not sent within the time prescribed by the head of the
departments concerned causing great concern to the Commission. The Government have
further intimated that the Human Rights Commission is of the opinion that before passing
interim aid related orders, the reply of the notices issued to the Government are not
provided in time, therefore, the Commission is constrained to pass exparte orders without
taking cognizance of the State Government. Sometimes, it has been found that replies of
the notices issued by the Commission are not sent by the head of the departments
concerned but by their subordinates, which is not proper.

Therefore, while enclosing herewith a copy each of the Government letter no.
Adhi-2804/VII-Nyaya-1-2005-215/2002, dated August 31, 2005 and letter No. 122/VIMa-2/2005, dated 01.08.2005, I am directed to say that contents of the letter be gone
through unerringly and necessary action in compliance be ensured.