# District Judges to meet the cost on the above account by affecting savings on nonessential items in their sanctioned budget allotment

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 48
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1961-09-12
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 48
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/district-judges-to-meet-the-cost-on-the-above-account-by-affecting-savings-on-162203
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

143
District Judges to meet the cost on the above account by affecting savings on nonessential items in their sanctioned budget allotment.
C.L. No. 48 dated 26th July, 1962

Under GO. No. A-l-3431/X-14(9)-1961, dated September 12, 1961, the District
Judges, in supersession of the C.L. No. 7/Ve-77, dated May 10, 1952, have been
authorised to entertain extra copyists and execution clerks in the lowest sanctioned scale
subject to the condition that no demand for extra funds or supplementaries will be
entertained on account of this delegation (vide serial no. 10 of the Caption "Temporary
Establishment" in the Annexure to the G.O. referred to).

In case they find it necessary to entertain any extra temporary copyist or copyists
which they cannot do for want of savings in their budget they should immediately move
the Court in the matter with facts and figures justifying their demand so that the Court
may sanction the entertainment of such temporary post or posts for a period not
exceeding one year in view of the powers delegated to the Court under serial no. 21821954, dated August 5, 1955 and provide funds from the grant placed at its disposal.
C.L. No. 67/Ve-77 dated 9th June, 1952

District Judges should notify such appointments made by them to Government
through the High Court.
C.L. No. 80/Ve-77 dated 19th July, 1952 read with
G.L. No. 24/Ve-77-1 dated 11th September, 1974

While reporting to the Court the appointment of additional copyist or while
applying for extra assistance in the Copying office, District Judges shall furnish
information on the points mentioned below:
(1)
Existing number of copyists, permanent and temporary.
(2)
Number of words copied out by each one of the copyists during the six
months preceding the month in which extra assistance is asked for. The
number of English and Urdu or Hindi words, in manuscript or type, should
be shown separately.
(3)
Number of days on which each copyist worked during the six months.
(4)
Average number of words (English and Urdu or Hindi, in manuscript or
type, to be shown separately) applied for, by applicants for copies, during
the twelve preceding months.
(5)
Number of English and Urdu or Hindi words in manuscript or type
pending for copy.
(6)
Whether the copyists were allowed to avail of the whole of the last
vacation; if not, the number of days in the vacation on which each copyist
worked.
(7)
Reasons for accumulation of arrears.
144
C.L. No. 95-1 dated 19th October, 1957

The practice of allowing the Head Copyist the assistance of a copyist who, in lieu
of the assistance rendered by him, is exempted from giving his daily outturn of work is
objectionable as it contravenes the provisions of rule 267, Chapter X of General Rules
(Civil), 1957.

Previous sanction of the Court may, however, be obtained where it is considered
necessary to exempt a copyist from doing copying work.
C.L. No. 31/VIIIb-1 dated 27th April, 1963
As far as practicable, English and Hindi typists should work on English and Hindi
typewriter respectively and should not be permitted to prepare copies by hand.
(vii) Temporary execution clerks
C.L. No. 114 dated 13th November, 1953
Whenever execution work falls heavily in arrears on account of creation of
additional courts, proposal for appointment of an execution clerk for the permanent or
temporary court of Civil Judge or Munsif, as the case may be, may be submitted to the
Court with facts and figures in support of the case.
(viii) Additional staff for temporary and Honorary Courts
C.L. No. 73/B dated 30th October, 1950
Temporary staff of additional courts should, unless there are orders to the
contrary, be employed only from the date the presiding officer takes over charge and
should be disbanded on the presiding officer handing over charge or the court becoming
vacant as the case may be.
G.L. No. 53/B dated 18th September, 1934
The Staff attached to a temporary court such as that of a temporary Additional
District and Sessions Judge which is provided for a specified period should, in the
interest of economy, be dismissed when the court has been expressly held in obeyance or
when the presiding officer goes on leave for more days and no substitute is provided.
After the temporary court has been revived or on the return of the presiding
officer from leave, the sanctioned staff should be re-employed.
C.E, No. 40/IXg-19 dated 19th June, 1964
As a measure of economy, Government have decided that on the non-plan side,
except in Public Sector commercial takings, staff for new offices and new schemes under
the heads of department should be drawn from the existing staff under their control by
internal rearrangement and the powers to create temporary posts delegated to them should
be exercised only when it is necessary to abolish a post and to create another in its place
with a view to giving effect to such rearrangement. When it is absolutely impossible to
make any such adjustments and entertainment of new staff is unavoidable the matter
should be referred to the Government in the administrative department.