# Effect of stay order

- **Citation:** C.L.No 39/98
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1968-06-17
- **Case number:** C.L.No 39/98
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/effect-of-stay-order-163303
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

220
Effect of stay order
G.L. No. 18/67015 dated 1st August, 1928
An order of stay is passed by this court on the supposition that execution of a
particular decree has not taken place. If execution has already taken place, it is not the
intention of this Court that there should be restitution in pursuance of the order of this
Court.
Expeditious disposal of Execution Cases.
C.L.No 39/98 : Dated 20th August, 1998
 It has come to the notice of the Court that interest in the disposal of
execution cases is not being taken by the judicial officers. Pendency of execution cases
for a very long time not only results in hardship to the decree-holders but also
creates unnecessary litigation. The Court has taken a decision that by giving due
regards to the existing laws and the provisions efforts should be made for early
disposal of execution cases.
I am, therefore, directed to communicate you the direction to the Hon`ble for
Court for strict compliance.
Execution in Jammu and Kashmir
C.L. No. 51/VIIIb-16-4-55 dated 30th August, 1955

The decrees passed by a civil court in India may be executed through a court situate
in the State of Jammu and Kashmir as if the decree had been passed by such a court in
that State.
Execution in foreign countries
C.E. No. 73/VIII-b-245 dated 11th August, 1969
Under notification, dated June 17, 1968, Republic of Singapore has been declared
a reciprocating territory for the purpose of section 44 A C.P.C. and the High Court of the
Republic of Singapore to be a superior Court with reference to that territory.
C.E. No. 81 dated 22nd August, 1969

From 1st September, 1968 ̳Trinidad' and Tobago are declared to be reciprocating
territories for the purpose of section 44- A C.P.C. and the following courts will be
superior courts of that territory:
(e)
High Courts;
(f)
Courts of Appeal;
(g)
Industrial Court; and
(h)
Income Tax Appeal Board
221
17.
COMPLIANCE OF RULE 351٭ GENERAL RULES (CIVIL) 1957, VOL. I.
C.L. No. 83/VIIIv-112/Admn.(G), dated 30th November, 1989

I am directed to invite your attention to Rule 351 of the General Rules (Civil),
1957 (As amended) and to request you kindly to submit your report to the Court at an
early date, as to how your are handling the problem of your judgeship in compliance of
the provisions of Rules of the provisions of Rule 351 ibid.
Compliance of Rule 351 General Rules (Civil) 1957, Vol. 1.
No. 11007/VIIIb-112/Admn. (G) dated 25th October, 1991

With reference to Court's letter No. 7522/VIIIb-112/Admn. (G) dated July 31,
1991 on the above subject I am directed to say that due to inadvertence in the letter dated
31.7.1991 ―Rule357‖ was mentioned where as it should have been ―Rule 351'.
I am, therefore, while enclosing herewith a copy of Courts Circular Letter No.
83/VIIIb-112/Admn. (G) dated November 31, 1989, to request you kindly to send the
desired information to the court as asked therein at an early date.
18.
CONSUMER FORUM MATTERS
(i)
Settlement of Consumers' disputes as per Consumers Protection rules, 1987
C.L. No. 104/VIIf-252/Admn. (G) dated 17th November, 1990
I am directed to say that certain District Judges, have approached the Court that
they are facing problems in their normal working by virtue of their appointment to Head
of the District Forum under the subject and sought clarification from the Court. The
Court on a consideration of the matter is of the opinion that in view of the orders of the
Supreme Court, no further instructions are possible at this stage and has directed that the
present arrangement may continue subject to clarification that, as far as possible, the
District Judges may hold the Session of the Consumers Protection Council after the court
working hours or on holidays as the case may be.
The Court has further decided to request the Government to move the Supreme
Court for clarification, namely, that an Additional District Judge can also be appointed to
preside over the Consumers Protection Council with the concurrence of the High Court.

I am to add that the Government is being requested as mentioned and necessary
directions shall follow after decision as taken in the matter.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to act in accordance with the Consumers
Protection Act, 1986 and Consumers Protection Rules, 1987 with the directions
contained in this circular letter.
(ii)
Place of sitting of the District Forum under the Consumer Protection Rules,
1987.
C.L. No. 27 VIIf-252/Admin (G) Dated 15th April 1991
In continuation of Court's Circular letter No. 104/VIIf-252/Admn.(G), dated
November 17, 1990, on the above subject, I am directed to say that certain District
Judges have approached this Court to know as to what would be the place of sitting of

٭ This rule deals with the custody of cash and articles of value in Subordinate Courts.