# Fast Track court should be manned by the senior experienced Additional - **Citation:** C.L.No. 30/ - **Court:** Allahabad High Court - **Decided:** 2001-08-31 - **Case number:** C.L.No. 30/ - **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/fast-track-court-should-be-manned-by-the-senior-experienced-additional-162884 - **Pages:** 2 ## Text 64 1. Fast Track court should be manned by the senior experienced Additional Sessions Judge so as fulfill the object for which these courts have been established. 2. Where it is not manned by the senior experienced Additional district Judge, District Judge will make over the case to respective court keeping in view the object of the Fast track court and also to ensure proper administration of justice. 3. Where the retired employees are not available or they are otherwise incapable to perform the duties assigned to them, District Judge may proceed to make ad hoc appointments for specified period and may make internal arrangement by providing experienced personnel to these fast Track Court and these ad hoc appointees may be posted in other courts so as to make these courts more effective and functional. 4. The District Judges should also provide additional hands to fast Track Court from out of the existing strength where numbers of courts are already lying vacant in the district. 5. Necessary infrastructure facilities should be provided to these courts from the existing stock. (v) To provide information regarding establishment of monitoring committee C.L.No. 30/ 2001:dated:August 31, 2001 It has come to the notice of the court that in some districts the States Government has established Monitoring committee for looking after the civic amenities. In this regard, I am directed to request you kindly to furnish the following information to the court:- 1. When and on what grounds the Monitoring committee has been established in your district? 2. Whether it is true that in the year 2001 some complaint made by the corporations of Municipal corporations, chairman of cooperative Bank regarding Monitoring Committee have been received by you? The above informations may kindly be furnished to the court immediately by FAX. (vi) Monthly Meeting of the district Monitoring Cell. C.L.No.34 dated: October 4/2001 It has come into the notice of the Hon'ble court that Monitoring Cell Meeting is not held in the district regularly every month in pursuance of the marginally noted Circular Letters. The importance of the District Monitoring Cell Meeting was discussed in the Joint Meeting of the Divisional commissions and District Magistrates held at Lucknow on 13.3.2001. Thrust was also laid for holding Monitoring cell Meeting regularly and to take up such matters which are helpful in the expeditious disposal of the case, In that regard G.O. 1. C.L.No.55/IVf-93/Admin/ ̳G'dated 4.9.1991. 2. C.L.No.15/IVf-93/ Admin'G'dated 3.1993 3. C.L.No.11/IVf-93Admin. ̳G' dated 18.2.1995 65 No. 872/VII-Nyay-2/2001-21(G) /91 dated 23.6.2001 (copy enclosed) has also been issued by the state Government. I am therefore to request you to comply with the orders of the court. (vii) Monthly Meeting of the District Monitoring cell. C.L.No.18/ IVf-93:Dated: May 23,2003 The Hon'ble court has issued circular Letter No.55/IVf-93 dated 4.9.1991, No.15/IVf-93, dated 22.3.1993, No.11/IVf-93dated 18.2.1995, No.62/IVf-93,dated 8.11.1996 and No.34/IVf-93,dated 4.10.2001 whereby thrust was given for holing meeting of monitoring cell regularly. But it has come to the notice of the High court that the meetings of Monitoring cell are not being held in the districts regularly. In this regard, I am directed to say that the district Judge should hold the meeting of the monitoring cell regularly every month and send reports of the meetings held and the results achieved thereof. I am, therefore, to request you to kindly comply with the aforesaid orders of the court and to hold the meeting of monitoring cell every month send reports thereof to the court. (viii) For Compliance of the directions contained in certain Cri. Misc Bail Application in regard to taking up the matter in Monitoring Cell Meeting. C.L.No.42 dated 29 August, 2000 I am desired to convey the observations made by the Hon'ble Court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.K.Jain) in regard to the marginally noted criminal Misc Bail Applications: ―This is yet another case where the Investigating officer has failed to perform the duty and had adopted short-cut method to work out the same. The first information Report does not name any accused. However as the statements under Section 161 Cr. PC the witness are said to have named the assailants and the miscreants. It was duty of Investigation Officer to have put the suspects to test identification in order to find out whether the statements of the witnesses were credible or not. I have observed earlier also that this has become a tendency amongst the Investigation officers to adopt short-cut methods and they spoil criminal cases. Need deliberations and discussion in monitoring Cell Meeting with Senior Superintendent of police and District Magistrate. 1. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.10587 of 2000, Baboo Lal Vs. State of U. P. 2. Crl.Misc Bail Application no.10620 of 2000, Fultan Vs. State of U. P. 3. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.10685 of 2000,Karpendra alias Kaka Vs. State. 4. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.10696 of 2000, Ram Roop Ulla Vs. State of U. P. 5. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.8083 of 2000, Nihal Ahmad & another Vs. State of U. P. 6. Crl.Misc Bail Application No. 7786 of 2000 Deshraj Vs. State of U. P.