# from the date of their institution

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 84/VIII
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1923-08-20
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 84/VIII
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/from-the-date-of-their-institution-162333
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

197

Therefore, I am directed to request you to kindly ensure that all the departmental
inquires against the staff members should be concluded with in a period of three months
from the date of their institution .

I am,further to add that the contents of this Circular Letter may please be
brought to the notice of all the Judicial Officers working under your administrative
control for strict compliance .
(iii) Punishment
G.L. No. 2838 dated 20th August, 1923
A copyist who after due and sufficient warning either cannot or will not write a
legible hand should be dismissed.
G.L. No. 39/Xa-14 dated 1st June, 1955
Any official found responsible for neglect in the duty of enclosing copy of plaint or
application with the summonses or notices should be seriously dealt with.
C.L. No. 84/VIII- b-10 dated 7th September, 1953
Whenever a notice is received from the Presiding Officer of a court by a District
Judge of the proposed issue of a warrant of arrest against any member of the civil court
staff in his judgeship, he should take steps to suspend or otherwise- relieve such
government servant with as little delay, as possible and inform the Presiding Officer
concerned of the probable date of such suspension or relief.
C.L. No. 34/Admn. (D) dated 1st April, 1978
Invites attention to the principles laid down in G.K. Naidu versus State of M.P., AIR
1968 SC 240 and the provisions of Fundamental Rule 54(B) of Financial Hand Book Vol.
II, Part II to IV as amended up-to-date.
All the District Judges are requested to see that before passing final orders for
forfeiting or disallowing any part of the salary for the period of suspension in the case of
a delinquent official, the aforesaid rule is strictly followed by giving the official notice of
the quantum proposed and considering the representation, if any.
C.L. No. 18/Ve-94(99) Admn. (D) dated 2nd April, 1981
Encloses G.O. No. 5602/xx-1-80-13/167/77 dated 25th Nov., 1980 and requires all
the District Judges to send information to the Government in the event of
termination/compulsory retirement of a temporary scheduled caste/scheduled tribes
government servant from service, within a month.
C. L.. No.74/2007Admin(D) : Dated : 13.12. 2007
Punitive action against defaulting process servers

The Hon'ble Court has observed that despite there being adequate number of
process servers in each judgeship the sufficient number of processes are not being served
by the process servers. As per Circular Letter no. 54 of 1968 every process server must
effect service of at least 700 processes every year but the compliance of this direction is
not being made.

Therefore, in continuation of the above noted Circular Letter I am directed to say
that wherever the process servers are found wanting in achieving the target , punitive
action against the defaulting process server must be initiated by the Officer In charge
Nazarat and the District Judge concerned .
198

 I am further to add that kindly make strict compliance of the above direction of
the Hon'ble Court.
(iv) Appeals
C.L. No. 140/Ve-5-Admn. (D) dated 30th August, 1976
Invites attention to sub-rule 9 of rule 7 of the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Court‟s
Staff (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1976; and the District Judges are requested to
send the list of withheld appeals regularly to the Court as provided under the Rules.
C.L.. No. 69/Ve-5/Admn. (D) dated 23rd September, 1986
The District Judge, while forwarding the departmental appeals to the Court, should
also send parawise comments on the appeal along with the enquiry file, character roll and
service book/service roll, within 15 days of its receipt.
C.L. No. 17/Ve-5/Admn. (D) dated 28th March, 1989

The District judges are requested to follow the instructions contained in the above
circular letter very strictly.
C.L. No. 50/Ve-5/Admn. (D) dated 17th April, 1990
Speedy disposal of departmental appeals
I am directed to invite your kind attention to the Circular Letters No. 69/Ve5/Admn.(D) Department dated 23.9.1986 and No. 17/Ve-5/Admn.(D) Deptt. dated
28.3.1989, on the above subject wherein directions were issued to forward the
departmental appeals alongwith your parawise comments, relevant enquiry file, character
roll and service book/service roll to the Court within fifteen days from the date of receipt
of the appeal, but, it is a matter of much concern that these directions are not being
followed and the appeals are forwarded to the Court with long delay and without the
relevant papers as desired. It is only after several reminders in individual cases that the
comments and relevant papers are received and thus it causes delay in disposal of the
appeals. This state of affair is not only deplorable but provides material for displeasure of
the Court.
It is now desirable that you should look into the matter personally and instruct the
Senior Administrative Officer/Sadar Munsarim to be vigilant in putting up the matter or
departmental inquiries and appeals before you for necessary action promptly. Slackness,
if any, in this regard will be viewed seriously by the Court.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to decide the departmental inquiries
expeditiously and forward the appeals preferred by delinquents alongwith comments and
other relevant papers as required in the aforesaid circular letters expeditiously to the
Court.
[15] PAY AND ALLOWANCES
(i) To substitutes
G.L. No. 3092-A-2(3) dated 14th September, 1917
Allowances up to the sanctioned scale should not be granted to substitutes
appointed in place of paid apprentices in civil courts when the latter are appointed to
officiate in permanent or sub-protempore vacancies and no substitute should be appointed
in place of a paid apprentice, employed temporarily in short vacancies.