# have been served and complied with

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 32
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1993-12-15
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 32
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/have-been-served-and-complied-with-163626
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

356
C.L. No. 32 dated 22nd May, 1981

All the District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates are directed to see that the
orders of the Court are properly complied with, with all promptness and reports
regarding compliance of Court's orders are sent immediately to the Court after the orders
have been served and complied with.
C.L No. 19/VIIIb-119Admn.(G) dated 11th April, 1989

Whenever a reference is made to the Chief Judicial Magistrate of the district
concerned regarding an inquiry and report about demise of an appellant in a case pending
in the Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate generally forwards to this Court the statement
of the police pairokar and statements of one or two witnesses of that area, without
applying his mind. This practice is not satisfactory.

Henceforth in such matters the Chief Judicial Magistrate should ensure that the
police submit a correct report regarding the death of the appellant and after getting
himself satisfied with the report so submitted by the police, he should forward the same
to the Court.
53.
COMPLIANCE OF ORDERS OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT
(i)
Copy of Court's order dated 25.11.1993 passed in Criminal Misc. Case
No.669 of 1993 Surya Prakash Dubey and another v. C.J.M. & others.
C.L. No. 8O/Admn.(A) dated December 15, 1993
I am directed to send herewith a copy of Court's order dated 25.11.1993 passed to
Criminal Misc. Case No.669 of 1993 Surya Prakash Dubey and another v. Chief Judicial
Magistrate and others for compliance.

I am also to request you kindly to emphasize upon the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
working under you to comply with the aforesaid orders of the Court strictly, in future.
Hon'ble R.K. Agarwal, J

Compliance report from the C.J.M. Pratapgarh has not been received regarding
service on opp. party no.4. Notice was sent by the office to the C.J.M. Pratapgarh on
27.10.93 with a direction that the notices be returned to this Court by 11.11.93. It is a
matter of regret that C.J.M. Pratapgarh has not taken any care to see that the compliance
of the Court's order is made. The Court has noticed that C.J.Ms. do not pay proper
attention for complying with the Court's order and the cases are to be adjourned on
account of non-compliance of the Court's orders. This state of affair is highly deplorable.
District Judge concerned also cannot ignore this state of affair and should during regular
inspection as well as surprise inspection must see that the court's orders are, as this lapse
also would affect their efficiency regarding administrative control, duly complied with by
the CJ.Ms. concerned. Addl. Registrar is directed to send a copy of this order to all the
District Judges and C.J.Ms. and also to the Government advocate. List in the week
beginning from 2Oth December, 1993.
C.L. No. 27/dated July 7, 1995
It has come to the notice that the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court in criminal
cases are not often complied and in most of the cases compliance reports are not
357
submitted to the Court properly and promptly despite C.L.No. 88/Admn. (B), dated June
1, 1974 and C.L. No.32, dated 22.5.1984. The Hon'ble Court has taken a serious view of
the matter.
I am, therefore, to request you to kindly look into the matter personally and direct
the Chief Judicial Magistrates to enter all process and orders issued by the Hon'ble Court
in the process register maintained in their offices and it shall be their personal
responsibility to ensure that due compliance is made and timely information is sent to this
Court.
(ii)
Compliance of the Judicial Orders of the High Court and Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Criminal Cases
C.L. No.10 dated March 1, 1996
It has been brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Court that subordinate Courts who
have passed a sentence of convictions are not often issuing the conviction warrants when
the criminal appeal or criminal revisions preferred against their orders are dismissed.
Attention of all the Officers is drawn to provision contained in Section 418 Cr. P.C.,
Rules 24 & 97 of General Rules (Criminal) and C.L. No. 88/Admn. (B), dated 1.6.1974.
Kindly impress upon all the officers working under you that compliance of the
orders of superior Courts in such matters shall be their personal responsibility. The Court
shall take a serious view in case of default reported to the Court.
Compliance of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court issued in WP (Civil) No.
1128 of 1986 - Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India & Others.
(Published in J.T. 1996 (4) SC 701)
C.L.No.31/VIIIb-287 Admin ̳G' Section Dated June 12, 1996
While enclosing a copy of order passed in the aforesaid Writ Petition, I am
directed to intimate you that the directions contained in the above mentioned order of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court, be strictly complied with.
 I am, therefore, to request you that the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
be communicated to all the Criminal courts in the Judgeship for strict compliance and
such compliance report be submitted to the court within three months from the date of
receipt of this communication.
(iii)
Compliance of the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in
criminal appeal no.82 of 1995 - Bani Singh and others v. State of U.P.
C.L.No.65/ Admin: (G) Dated 02 Dec., 1996.
While enclosing a copy of the judgment dated 9.7.1996 passed in the aforesaid
criminal Appeal reported in Judgment Today (1996 (6) S.C.287. I am directed to
communicate you and all the officers posted in the judgeship that directions given in the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court be complied with so that the administration of
Criminal Justice may be toned up.
I am, therefore to direct you that the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court be
brought to the knowledge of the officers posted in the Judgeship for strict compliance.