# (i) Submission of papers

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 60/IVf-67
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1908-08-27
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 60/IVf-67
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/i-submission-of-papers-162362
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

206
[16] PENSION
(i) Submission of papers
G.L. No. 5 dated 27th August, 1908
Pension cases of non-gazetted Officers of subordinate courts may be sent by
District Judges direct to the Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh and not through the High
Court for verification and report.
C.E. No. 25/Ve-91 dated 9th February, 1971
The District Judges should ensure that the certificate of payment of provisional
pension and Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity is recorded on each and every pension case
and then only the cases be submitted to the Accountant General and delay in authorising
final payment of pension and Death-cum- Retirement Gratuity should be avoided.
C.L. No. 60/IVf-67 dated 3rd May, 1971
District Judges should ensure that a list of such gazetted and non-gazetted
government servants as are due to retire during the next 12 to 18 months, is prepared in
the prescribed proforma after every six months, i.e., January 1, and July 1, and sent by
January 31, and July 31, respectively, a copy each to A.G., U.P., Allahabad and
Government of U.P. under intimation to the Court as provided in paragraph 905(3) of the
Civil Service Regulation.
NOTE: G.O. No. Sa-3-786/Ten-1988 dated 26th May, 1988 and G.O. No. Sa-3-893/Ten88-912-85 dated 2nd June, 1988, now require such communications to be addressed to
the Director, Pension Directorate, U.P. established to deal with the pension cases.
C.E. No. 33/Ve-91 dated 20th July, 1967
Instructions contained in G.O. No. FD/SAO/PI/5235/X-P-63, dated
December 16/18, 1963 regarding submission of quarterly statement of pension
cases should be meticulously followed. In future the statement should be submitted as
under :
1.
Quarter ending 31st March
...
15th May
2.
Quarter ending 30th June
...
15th August
3.
Quarter ending 30th September
...
15th November
4.
Quarter ending 31st December
...
15th February
It is the responsibility of Head of Department to ensure that the return in the
prescribed proforma reaches the Finance Department (Pensions) on the due dates fixed.
Defaulting subordinate officers should be dealt with suitably. The information in the
proforma should be thoroughly scrutinized and fresh additions of old cases in subsequent
returns should be avoided.
C.L. No. 91/Ve-91 dated 7th September, 1978
The Court feels that at least one of the pensionary benefits must be made available
to the retired government servants within 24 hours of his retirement while other benefits
should also be made available within a week or ten days thereafter.
The Court will view with appreciation if the rules and directions on the subject are
observed meticulously and claims are settled without delay and at least one of the
pensionary benefits is made available within 24 hours of retirement of the government
servant concerned. At the same time any inordinate delay will be viewed with great
concern.
207
A statement of cases which have not been settled within a month of retirement or
death of a government servant, with reason for the delay, should be prepared and
submitted to the court positively upto the 15th of the subsequent month.
C.L. No. 23/Ve-86/Admn. (D) dated 7th April, 1983
In order to obtain sanction for commutation of pension of an employee of the civil
court it is necessary to look into the particulars mentioned in the pension payment order
of the official who applies for commutation of his superannuation pension.
In future a certified/attested copy of the P.P.O. may be obtained from the pensioner
and sent invariably with all the applications for commutation of pension, which are
forwarded to the Court for sanction of commutation.
(ii) Pension cases to be expedited
C.E. No. 77/Ve-91 dated 29th July, 1972 and
C.E. No. 86/lVb-57 dated 9th August, 1972
Pension cases of government servants should be finalized as early as possible to
avoid inconvenience to them.
C.L. No. 46/VC-86/Admn.(D) dated 27th August,1992
Expeditious Disposal of pension cases of the staff of subordinate court in accordance
with the procedure contained in G.O. dated 13.12.77 and 28.7.89.
I am directed to enclose herewith a copy of D.O. Letter No. Pay Ni/102/80, dated
21.4.1992 addressed to the Registrar received from the Pension Directorate Lucknow
along with a copy of judgment in Writ Petition No. 10134/91;* Mukti Nath Rai v. State of
Uttar Pradesh issuing mandamus to all the Heads of the Departments for compliance of
the General Mandamus, on the above subject and to request you kindly to submit all the
pending pension papers to the Director Pension, Lucknow without any delay and ensure
that in future also all the pension papers of the employees working under your Judgeship
retiring within six months of the date of superannuation be sent to the Directorate
Pension, Lucknow well in advance in accordance with the procedure contained in G.O.
No. Sa-3-2085/X-907/76, dated 13.12.77 and subsequent G.O. No. Sa-3-1713/X-933/89,
dated 28.7.1989 and also mandamus issued in Writ Petition referred to above.
I am further directed to request you kindly to intimate the Court as well as to the
Directorate Pension, Lucknow immediately about the cause of delay in submitting the
pension papers of the persons named in the enclosed list.
102 92 80,
21
1992
3 2085
907 76
13 12 77
3-1713
933 89
20 7 89
6
6

* For perusal of Judgment See Mukti Nath Rai v. State of U.P.; 1993 All. L.J. 835