# (ii) Travelling allowance to Amins

- **Citation:** C.L.No. 3/VIc-14
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1950-04-01
- **Case number:** C.L.No. 3/VIc-14
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/ii-travelling-allowance-to-amins-162340
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

199
(ii) Travelling allowance to Amins
C.L.No. 3/VIc-14 dated 22nd January, 1968 read with
C.L. No. 27/Vc-14 dated 25th March, 1968 and
C.E. No. 75/Ve-74 dated 31st August, 1968
In view of the amendment made in Part 1 of Appendix II of the Financial
Handbook, Volume III and addition of rule 530-A in the General Rules (Civil), 1957, the
civil court Amins and their peons are entitled to travelling allowance for railway journeys
and at ordinary rates in respect of road journeys within their jurisdiction (G.L. No. 8/VIc
1450 dated April 1, 1950)
The civil court Amins are entitled to daily allowance for the road journeys
according to rules.
C.L. No. 3/4A-A-Admn. (D) dated 2nd January, 1984
The T.A. bills of civil court Amins should be regulated in accordance with the
provisions of rule 24-A Chapter III and Appendix II Part I of the Financial Handbook
volume III.
C.L. No. 43/VIII-b-135 dated 11th May, 1959
The separate book of traveling allowance bills of Amins and their peons required to
be maintained under rule 530-A of the General Rules (Civil), 1957 as added by Court‟s
notification no. 99/VIII-b-135, dated March 23, 1959, should be maintained only by those
courts to which an Amin is attached.
A District Judge may, in his discretion, direct the maintenance of this book under
the supervision of officer-in-charge of work of Amins.
(iii) Arrears
C.L. No. 30/Ve-75 dated 30th March, 1951
In order to reduce the number of cases in which District Judges move the High
Court to sanction investigation of claims by the Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh in
respect of arrears of pay and allowances due to a member of the staff of a subordinate
court as required under paragraph 74(b) Financial Handbook, Volume V, Part I, it is
necessary that all such claims should be looked into and taken up with as little delay as
possible.
C.E. No. 26/VIII-23 dated 30th March, 1965
Before referring cases of time-barred claims covered under Para 74(b)(iv) of the
Financial Handbook, Volume V, Part I to Vitta Vibhag for sanction, the courts will
record satisfactory reasons for the delay caused clarifying convincingly that the claimant
was not responsible for the delay. Vitta Vibhag will not insist on prior action being taken
against the defaulters in cases in which the position has been explained fully and
satisfactorily and the Administrative Department has assured that suitable action will be
taken. Delay in payment is opposed to all rules and budgeting principle and when delay
comes to light a serious notice has to be taken.