# Indents for cotton textiles

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 14/VIIIc-12
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1969-06-25
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 14/VIIIc-12
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/indents-for-cotton-textiles-162988
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

96
(vi)
Indents for cotton textiles
C.L. No. 14/VIIIc-12, dated 5th March, 1955
Whenever any additional quantity of cotton textile is required,' after a regular
indent has been placed, no amendment increasing the quantity should be issued; but fresh
indent in the prescribed forms should be submitted to the Director of Supplies, Government of India, Ministry of Works, Housing and Supply, Shahibag House, Ballard Estate,
Bombay-1, through the Director of Industries (Textile section) Kanpur, in triplicate.
(vii) Purchase from the grant at the disposal of District Judge
C.L. No- 29/IX-q-19 dated 17th March, 1953 as modified by
C.L. No. 56 of 1953
Articles other than those covered by rule 37 of Appendix X of Financial Hand
book, Volume V, Part I, should not be purchased by District Judges from the grants at
their disposal. Only articles which are undisputably intended for office use should be
purchased from the grants at a cost not exceeding Rs. 50 per annum in a judgeship.
C.L. No. 15/21-M dated 19th/22nd March, 1955
Articles such as Judge's wash basins, mirrors, soap cases, towel stands, easy
chairs, angethi and charcoal etc., should be purchased by District Judges only when they
are really necessary in the discharge of their duties and the officers subordinate to them.
The cost of these items should be debited under the Head ―27-Administration of Justice‖
and must be met out of the reduced contingent allotment placed at the disposal of the
judgeship or court.
C. E. No. 66 dated 26th June, 1961
Special grants are sanctioned to provide for essential articles of common use.
Purchase of liveries, electric rods, etc., out of these grants is objectionable. In case there
is need for other items which cannot be classified as essential items, for any special
reasons, sanction should be obtained before actual purchase.
C.L. No. 75/Xb-2 (Budget) dated 11th August, 1969
As recommended in paragraph 78 of the report on Re-organization and
Rationalization of the Civil Court Offices, the District Judges should continue to control
the contingent grant of even temporary courts so that there may be uniformity in practice.
C.L. No. 129/Xe-44 dated 28th November, 1970
Attention of District Judges is invited to Government Endorsement
No.412(SP)/(i)/XVIII-E, dated June 25, 1969, regarding timely payment to the suppliers
for goods procured through the agency of the Stores Section of the Directorate of
Industries and strict compliance of the instruction contained in Government Industries
(E) Department, office memorandum of date.

 NOTE : Now 2014.