# indicated herein above."

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 65/2007
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1985-05-05
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 65/2007
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/indicated-herein-above-162269
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

183
"The mere fact that the rule provides for the revision of the list from time to
time does not and cannot indicate that the list will be deemed to be subsisting till
exhausted as this revision becomes necessary as the list has to be utilised for filling
up temporary or officiating vacancies as well during the currency of the list as
indicated herein above."
The Hon‟ble High Court has issued the direction "requiring the District Judge to
ensure that:
(a)
all the available substantive vacancies in the posts covered by rule 12 of
the Rules or such vacancies which are likely to become available in the
year of recruitment and the year succeeding to it be notified inviting
applications before the preparation of the waiting list contemplated
therein.
(b)
the waiting list indicated above shall consist of the names of the
candidates in the proportion of 1:3 qua the notified number of vacancies;
(c)
the waiting list shall cease to be operative and stand exhausted on the
filling up of the last notified vacancy;
(d)
the fresh waiting list shall invariably be prepared before the accrual of the
vacancies so that there may not be any unnecessary delay its being filled
up.
(e)
all the existing „waiting lists‟ prepared under rule 12 of the Rules which
have served their purpose as indicated herein above shall cease to be
operative forthwith. The appointments already made shall, however,
remain undisturbed."
(vii)
Filling up of posts requiring particular skill by persons having that skill
C.L. No. 65/2007; Admin. (D): Dated 13.12.2007
It has been noticed by the Hon‟ble Court that in the Subordinate courts on various
posts such as accountant, amin, librarian etc. particular kind of skill related to that
discipline is required to be possessed by the incumbent to ensure flawless and smooth
functioning of the judgeship. Therefore the Hon‟ble Court desires that while appointing
persons on these posts the District Judge must give special preference to the persons
having proficiency in these areas.

Therefore you are requested to kindly ensure that in your judgeship, on the
occasion of any appointment having to be made on these posts such as librarian, amin and
accountant, special preference is given to such persons who have proficiency in the
concerned discipline such accountancy, survey and library science etc.

I am, further to add that kindly ensure compliance of the above direction in right
earnest.
[6]
REGULARISATION
(i)
Of Ad-hoc employees
C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn. (D) dated 5th May, 1985
The District Judges are requested to dispose of the pending matters of
regularization of Adhoc appointees in accordance with the law laid down by a Division
Bench of Allahabad High Court in Writ petition No. 12075/1984 U.P. Civil Court‟s
Ministerial Service Association through its General Secretary, Lucknow vs. State of U.P.
184
and others, wherein it has been held that Adhoc appointees who fulfil the requisite
conditions, as laid down in the Regularization Rules, shall be considered by the District
Judge for regularization.
C.L. No.70/Admn.(D) dated 24th December,1992
Regarding regularisation of Ad-hoc employees and submission of list of such Ad-hoc
employees appointed under Rule 269 G.R.(Civil).
I am directed to say that the Court has been pleased to pass the following orders on
the above subject :
1. That appointments of the Ad-hoc class III employees of the subordinate Courts,
who are entitled to the benefit of the U.P. Regularisation of Ad-hoc appointment (on
posts outside the purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, as amended
up-to-date (or as applicable on date), be regularised.
2. That Ad-hoc class III employees of the subordinate courts who are not entitled to
the benefit of the U.P. Regularisation of Ad-hoc Appointment (on posts outside the
purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979, but have been appointed prior
to 21st May, 1992, be allowed to continue subject to their appearing at and passing the
competitive test held for selection of class III employees of the subordinate courts.
3. That Ad-hoc class III employees, if any, appointed after the issuance of order
dated 21st May, 1992, passed by the Hon‟ble the Chief Justice in this regard be ceased
and explanation of the appointing authority for making such appointments be also
furnished to this Court.
4. That you are also hereby requested to prepare a list of Ad-hoc appointments
made under rule 269 G.R. (Civil) and submit the same to the Court immediately.
The aforesaid directions may kindly be complied with forthwith.
0
0
0 8
104
4
1991
3922
0
0 12 74
18
1986
1609 7
0
0 12 74
24
1990
307
2
0
0
2
2
4