# issued by the state Government

- **Citation:** C.L.No.18/
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1971-09-25
- **Case number:** C.L.No.18/
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/issued-by-the-state-government-162885
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

65
No. 872/VII-Nyay-2/2001-21(G) /91 dated 23.6.2001 (copy enclosed) has also been
issued by the state Government.
 I am therefore to request you to comply with the orders of the court.
(vii)
Monthly Meeting of the District Monitoring cell.
C.L.No.18/ IVf-93:Dated: May 23,2003

The Hon'ble court has issued circular Letter No.55/IVf-93 dated 4.9.1991,
No.15/IVf-93, dated 22.3.1993, No.11/IVf-93dated 18.2.1995, No.62/IVf-93,dated
8.11.1996 and No.34/IVf-93,dated 4.10.2001 whereby thrust was given for holing
meeting of monitoring cell regularly. But it has come to the notice of the High court that
the meetings of Monitoring cell are not being held in the districts regularly.

In this regard, I am directed to say that the district Judge should hold the meeting
of the monitoring cell regularly every month and send reports of the meetings held and
the results achieved thereof.
I am, therefore, to request you to kindly comply with the aforesaid orders of the
court and to hold the meeting of monitoring cell every month send reports thereof to the
court.
(viii) For Compliance of the directions contained in certain Cri. Misc Bail
Application in regard to taking up the matter in Monitoring Cell Meeting.
C.L.No.42 dated 29 August, 2000
I am desired to convey the observations made by the Hon'ble Court (Hon'ble
Mr. Justice P.K.Jain) in regard to the marginally noted criminal Misc Bail
Applications:
―This is yet another case
where
the
Investigating
officer has failed to perform
the duty and had adopted
short-cut method to work out
the
same.
The
first
information Report does not
name any accused. However
as
the
statements
under
Section 161 Cr. PC the
witness are said to have
named the assailants and the miscreants. It was duty of Investigation Officer to have
put the suspects to test identification in order to find out whether the statements of the
witnesses were credible or not.

 I have observed earlier also that this has become a tendency amongst the
Investigation officers to adopt short-cut methods and they spoil criminal cases.
 Need deliberations and discussion in monitoring Cell Meeting with Senior
Superintendent of police and District Magistrate.
1. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.10587 of 2000, Baboo
Lal Vs. State of U. P.
2. Crl.Misc Bail Application no.10620 of 2000, Fultan
Vs. State of U. P.
3. Crl.Misc
Bail
Application
No.10685
of
2000,Karpendra alias Kaka Vs. State.
4. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.10696 of 2000, Ram
Roop Ulla Vs. State of U. P.
5. Crl.Misc Bail Application No.8083 of 2000, Nihal
Ahmad & another Vs. State of U. P.
6. Crl.Misc Bail Application No. 7786 of 2000 Deshraj
Vs. State of U. P.
66
 I am, therefore to request you kindly to comply the order passed by the court in
the aforesaid Criminal Misc Bail Applications.
6-A. Information regarding Constitution of Infrastructure Cell
No. 560/PS(RG) dated 12 January, 2011

An Infrastructure Cell, in compliance of the order passed by the HC/Supreme
Court in Writ Petition No. 1022/1989 (All India Judges Association and Others v. Union
of India), has been established and Sri P.K. Srivastava and Sri Shamshad Ahmad have
been posted as Officers on Special Duty of the aforesaid Cell. The Fax Number of the
aforesaid Cell is 0532-2622956 and the E-mail is infrastructure@allahabadhighcourt.

You are, therefore, requested to make all correspondence with regard
infrastructure of your district on ibid number/E-mail.
7. EXTRA CLERK
C. L. No. 102/IVb-11, dated 9th June, 1976
The courts of regular Magistrates and Chief Judicial Magistrates handling files
exceeding 1000 in the aggregate may be provided an extra clerk.
8.
REGISTERS TO BE MAINTAINED BY SUBORDINATE COURTS
C. L. No. 45, dated 2nd April, 1952
A list of registers to be maintained in the Subordinate Civil Courts is appended to
the letter noted in the bloc. All the registers should be maintained and posted up to date.
District Judges should also exercise their discretion and make such variations in the
distribution or responsibility for the maintenance of these registers as the local conditions
may require.
C. L. No. 16/V-e-81, dated 23rd January, 1976
Maintenance of registers in Form nos. 36, 38 and 41 of the General Rules (Civil),
1957, Volume II, by the third clerk of the Administrative Department of the District
Judge in not necessary where all the courts are at the headquarters of the Judgeship. In
case of outlying courts of Munsifs Civil Judges and Additional District Judges these
registers shall continue to be maintained for consolidation of accounts of the judgeship as
a whole and for facility of correspondence by the District Judge with the Accountant
General.
C. L. No. 2/VIII-b-13, dated 10th January, 1972
Court's direction regarding the making of a note by all the presiding officers on
the Daily Sitting Register about the time wasted on account of witnesses not turning up as
contained in C.L. No. 121, dated September 25, 1971 should be strictly followed.
C. L. No. 51/VIII-120, dated 6th May, 1969
A register of preliminary decrees has to be maintained in manuscript with
appropriate heading and columns specified below:
(1)
Serial number
(2)
Case number with nature and year