# Lawyers abstaining from appearing in Court C.L.No. 126/Admn. (G) dated December 9, 1994 Keeping in view the interests of the litigants and the heavy pendency of work in the subordinate courts, the…

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 20/2006
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-11-23
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 20/2006
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/lawyers-abstaining-from-appearing-in-court-c-l-no-126-admn-g-dated-december-9-163990
- **Pages:** 4

## Headnote

Lawyers abstaining from appearing in Court C.L.No. 126/Admn. (G) dated December 9, 1994 Keeping in view the interests of the litigants and the heavy pendency of work in the subordinate courts, the Hon'ble Chief Justice and Judges have been pleased to direct that in the event of lawyers abstaining from appearing in Court, going on strike or boycotting courts, the Presiding Officers are required, as far as possible, to sit in Court

## Text

526
the presiding officers should call for the certificate of enrolment are otherwise satisfy
himself of the fact of enrolment of the person appearing as an Advocate.

The aforesaid direction may be complied with meticulously.
Compliance of direction in order dated 3.3.2006 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.
12458 of 2006- Purshottam Giri Vs. Deputy Director Consolidation, Bulandshahr
and others.
C.L. No. 20/2006: Admin ̳G' Dated: 29th May, 2006

The Hon'ble Court while dealing with particulars in Vakalatnama filed by the
advocates, has noticed that generally the Vakalatnama filed by the advocates do not contain
all requisite details as provided by rules and resolution dated 10.12.1989 passed by the Bar
Council taking cognizance of the fact that unscrupulous elements can be seen to be playing
tricks with the Courts bringing disrepute to the judiciary as well as to the dignity of the
lawyers community. Therefore, while enclosing herewith a copy of order dated 3.3.2006 in
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12458 of 2006- Purshottam Giri Vs. Deputy Director
Consolidation, Bulandshahr and others, I am directed to request that the contents of and
directions in the order dated 3.3.2006 aforesaid, be unerringly gone though all the way for
ensuring strict compliance by all concerned under your administrative control.
7.
PAYMENT OF FEES TO THE ADVOCATES ENGAGED BY THE
GOVERNMENT
Regarding payment of fees to the Advocates engaged by the government in the
subordinate court
C.L.No. 43/Admn.(F) dated 17th August, 1992
I am directed to send herewith a copy of government letter No. 478/VII-Nyay-3
(Niyuktiyan/85/90) dated 25th of June, 1991 together with its enclosure for immediate
compliance and necessary action.
2-
527
3-
528
2
3
529
2
3
8.
STRIKE BOYCOTTING OF COURTS BY THE LAWYERS
(i)
Concerning Strike or boycotting of Courts by the lawyers of the Judgeship
C.L.No. 112/Admn. ̳G'/dated November 23, 1994
I am directed to say that in the event of lawyers abstaining from appearing in
Court, going on strike or boycotting courts the Presiding Officers, as far as possible, sit in
court and dispose of matters listed before them in accordance with law.
I am further to ask you kindly to submit a Special report on the work done in all
the courts in your Sessions Division on the day which lawyers abstained from appearing
in court.
The instruction aforesaid may kindly be brought to the notice of all the Presiding
Officers working under you for information and compliance.
(ii)
Re : Lawyers abstaining from appearing in Court
C.L.No. 126/Admn. (G) dated December 9, 1994
Keeping in view the interests of the litigants and the heavy pendency of work in
the subordinate courts, the Hon'ble Chief Justice and Judges have been pleased to direct
that in the event of lawyers abstaining from appearing in Court, going on strike or
boycotting courts, the Presiding Officers are required, as far as possible, to sit in Court
and dispose of matters listed before them in accordance with law.
The Hon'ble Judges have further been pleased to direct that cases be listed for
hearing on all working days regardless of the call by the members of the Bar to go on
strike or to boycott courts.
It has further been directed that the District Judge shall submit a special report on
the work done in all the courts in the Sessions Division on the day on which lawyers
abstain from appearing in Court.
(iii) Compliance of order of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dated 11.1.1994 in
writ petition (Civil) Nos. 821 of 1990 and 320 of 1993
C.L. No. 61/LC/1296/ dated July 21, 1994
I am directed to send herewith a copy of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India dated 11.1.1994 passed by a Bench consisting of Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M.Ahmadi,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Punchhi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.P. Singh, with a copy of writ
petition Nos. 821/90 and 320/93 along with Public Notice and to request you to place the
notice and other connected papers on your respective Notice Board for information to Bar
Association and response, if any, to the petition, should be forwarded to the Registrar
(Judicial) Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi, through the President of Bar