# left for the purpose

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 80/IV-g-17
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1953-08-18
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 80/IV-g-17
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/left-for-the-purpose-163814
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

449
(10)
Intimation to auction- purchaser, decree-holder or judgment- debtor of the
date fixed for delivery of possession, when an addressed letter has been
left for the purpose.
(11)
Intimation of the result of a suit or application when the party has applied
that the result should be so communicated to him, and has left an
addressed letter for the purpose.
Guardianship certificates
C.L. No. 80/IV-g-17 dated 18th August, 1953
(Under a registered cover at the request and expense of the party, the postal
receipt being retained on the file of the case).
(ii)
 Execution of an order of Registrar, Co-operative Societies, etc.
G.L.No.2499/44-3 (8) dated 12th September, 1918
When an application for the enforcement of a decision of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies or an award of arbitrators appointed by him is filed in a court having
jurisdiction to entertain the same, an entry of the application shall be made in a register
kept in Form No.68.
(iii)
Final decree
G.L.No. 1885/67-5 dated 25th March, 1927
Applications under Order XXXIV, rule 5 must be treated as applications in suit
and must be noted in the register of regular suits.

The correct procedure to be followed when such applications are filed is for the
court to send for the record of the original suit, to enter the application in the index of
Part I and to proceed with the application as in continuation of the original suit.
(iv)
Review application
G.L.No.9/35-a-9 dated 25th March, 1943 as amended by
G.L.No.5/VII-d-III dated 14th October, 1954
An application for review under rule 2 of Order XLVII of the Code of Civil
Procedure should be made only to the Judge who passed the decree or made the order
sought to be reviewed. What is meant by this rule is that the application mentioned in the
rule can be made to the court so long as the same Judge is the presiding officer of the
court; the rule does not mean that the application should be personally presented by the
applicant himself.
(v) Presentation, disposal of application
G.L.No.4/Ve-58 dated 27th January, 1949
On coming to court, the presiding officer should first take up applications and
pass orders thereon, and no application should be taken after the fixed hour except those
in which limitation may be expiring.
450
C.L. No. 15/VII-b-6 dated 23rd January, 1952

All presiding officers should pass clear orders directing that all interlocutory
applications filed in court or presented to the Munsarim, should be put up before them for
orders without avoidable delay along with the office report and relevant papers. Presiding
Officers should further see that orders on these applications are issued promptly by the
office.
C.L.No. 94/V/b-47 dated 22nd July, 1975

Presiding officers should fix hours for entertaining applications and disposing
them off and such timing should invariably be adhered to. They should also keep in mind
that no application, as far as possible, is disposed of in chambers.
C.L.No.45/VIIIb-6 dated 13th July, 1984

All the presiding officers should strictly comply with the provisions of rule 17 and
32 of General Rules (Civil) and instructions contained in above noted C.Ls. with regard
to the presentation and disposal of applications in the subordinate courts. Hence-forth, the
applications should invariably be entertained at the time fixed by the District Judge and
be disposed of by an order passed in court as soon as they are presented, as required by
the aforesaid rules and instructions of the Court.
(vi)
 Application under section 340 Cr.P.C.
C.L.No.17/VII-b-45 dated 4th February, 1952
Application under section 476 (new section 340, etc.) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure should invariably be registered as a separate case and separate file, complete in
all respects, should be prepared in each case.
14.
COURT FEES AND STAMPS
(i)
Affixation and cancellation
G.L.No. 2874 dated 12th August, 1911
District Judges should impress on all the courts subordinate to them necessity of
attention to be paid to the under mentioned matters and should themselves look into them
while inspecting courts.
(1)
Stamps affixed in all pending cases shall be punched and no record shall
be deposited in the record room with unpunched stamps.
(2)
The following documents are often received unstamped and should be
specially attended to-
(a)
second or subsequent application to summon a witness,
(b)
application for examining a witness not summoned through court,
(c)
application to call for a record,
(d)
application to adjourn a case.
(3)
Number of words should invariably be noted upon certified copies.
(4)
The court-fee registers prescribed by the High Court should be properly
maintained.