# M/s Prasad Industries, Shahjahanpur & others v. D.M./Collector and others

- **Citation:** (2001) 1 ILRA 177
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2001
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/m-s-prasad-industries-shahjahanpur-others-v-d-m-collector-and-others-39056
- **Pages:** 3

## Text

1All] M/s Prasad Industries, Shahjahanpur & others V. .D.M./Collector and others 177
(2) The Legislature of a State may, by
law, provide-

(a) for
the
representation
in
a
municipality of-

(i) Persons having special knowledge or
experience in Municipal administration;
(ii) The members of the House of the
People and the members of he Legislative
Assembly
of
the
State
representing
constituencies which comprise wholly or
partly the Municipal area;
(iii) The members of the Counsel of
States and the members of the Legislature
of the State registered as electors within
the Municipal area;
(iv) The Chairpersons of the committees
constituted under Clause (5) of Article
243 S."

Provided that the persons referred to
in paragraph (I) shall not have the right to
vote in the meetings of the Municipality
(b) the manner of election of the
Chairperson of a Municipality"

13. In view of the provisions of law
as noted above, we are of the view that
the Stat Legislature was competent to
legislate for fixing the age of President for
contesting the election and the provisions
under the Municipalities Act fixing the
age limit at 30 years for the post of
President
is
not
violative
of
any
fundamental right of the petitioner.

14. That apart the other arguments
advanced on behalf of the petitioner also
we do not find any substance.

There is no merit in the Writ Petition
and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Petition Dismissed.

25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
&,9,/ 6,'(
&,9,/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$' 129(0%(5
'$7(' $//$+$%$' 129(0%(5
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21·%/( %,12' .80$5 52<
7+( +21·%/( %,12' .80$5 52< -
-
7+( +21·%/( 6. -$,1 -
7+( +21·%/( 6. -$,1 -

&LYLO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

06
3UDVDG
,QGXVWULHV
$OODKJDQM
6KDKMDKDQSXU RWKHUV 3HWLWLRQHUV
9HUVXV
'LVWULFW
0DJLVWUDWH
&ROOHFWRU
6KDKMDKDQSXU RWKHUV
«2SS 3DUWLHV

&RXQVHO IRU WKH 3HWLWLRQHUV
6UL .0/ +DMHOD
&RXQVHO IRU WKH 5HVSRQGHQWV
6PW 6DULWD 6LQJK
6&

&RGH RI &LYLO 3URFHGXUH 6;, 5HV
-XGLFDWD&RQVWUXFWLYH
UHV
-XGLFDWD
$SSOLFDELOLW\ WR ZULW SHWLWLRQV (VWRSSDO
:DLYHU $FTXLHVFHQFH
+HOG 3DUD
$SSDUHQWO\ WKH SUD\HUV PDGH E\ WKH
SHWLWLRQHUV LQ WKLV ZULW SHWLWLRQ ZKLFK
ZHUH
DOVR
PDGH
LQ
WKH
HDUOLHU
ZULW
SHWLWLRQ ZHUH QRW JUDQWHG 7KXV WKLV
ZULW SHWLWLRQ IRU WKH VDPH UHOLHI¶V ZKLFK
LV VHFRQG RQH LQ WKH DEVHQFH RI JUDQW RI
OHDYH
WR
WKH
SHWLWLRQHUV
WR WKH VXH
DIUHVK EDUUHG E\ WKH SULQFLSOH RI UHV
MXGLFDWD FRQVWUXFWLYH UHV MXGLFDWD LQ YLHZ
RI WKH UDWLR GHFLGHQGL ODLG GRZQ E\ WKH
+RQ¶EOH
6XSUHPH
&RXUW
LQ
6DUJXMD
7UDQVSRUW 6HUYLFH 9V 6WDWH 7UDQVSRUW
$SSHOODWH 7ULEXQDO ZDOLRU DQG RWKHUV
$,5 6XSUHPH &RXUW EHVLGHV RQ
WKH
JURXQGV
RI
HVWRSSHO
ZDLYHU
DFTXLHVFHQFH
DQG
DEDQGRQPHQW
DQG
WKXV WKLV ZULW SHWLWLRQ LV GLVPLVVHG EXW
ZLWKRXW FRVW
&DVH UHIHUUHG
$,5 6&
INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES [2001
178
By the Court

1. Petitioner No. 1 M/s Prasad
Industries, and Petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 who
are its partners, have come up with a
prayer to quash the entire recovery
proceedings initiated at the instance of
Respondent No. 3, Deputy Regional
Marketing Officer, Shahjahanpur, through
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for realisation of
Rs.19,36,784=40 paise from them as
arrears
of
land
revenue under the
provisions of the Rules framed under the
U.P.Z.A.
&
L.R.Act,1951
and
to
command them not to realize the said
amount from them.
2. Paragraphs 29 and 42 of this writ
petition reads thus:-

"29. That the petitioner ultimately
filed a writ petition no. 21812 of 1994 for
a writ of Certiorari for quashing the
citation dated 31.5.1994 and also for a
writ of Mandamus that the amount of
Rs.1936,784=40p. be not realized from
the petitioners in lump-sum.
x

x

x

x

42. That this Hon'ble Court finally
disposed of the said writ petition no.
21812 of 1994 by order dated 30.9.1994
permitting the petitioners to pay the
amount in dispute in installments. The
first Installment was required to be paid
by 31.3.1995.

3. Sri Hajela learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioners,
shows us the order dated 30.9.1994 by
which the earlier writ petition was
disposed by this Court. It is useful to
reproduce that order:-

"This
an
application
by
the
petitioners seeking installments of Rs.2
lakhs of three months each.

Learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that the applicants are willing to
repay the entire out-standing amount as
mentioned in the impugned citation dated
31.5.1994 (Annexure - 15A to the writ
petition), provided reasonable instalments
are made..

Hearing of the case has been
expedited as prayed by the petitioner.
Both learned counsel for the parties agree
to take up the matter today itself.

Ordinarily, we would not have
interfered in such matter as the liability
has not been denied, but as Sri S.K.
Srivastava, the learned Standing Counsel
has no objection to the installments being
granted, provided the petitioners deposit
half of the impugned amount upto
31.3.1995 and pay the balance amount in
monthly instalments of rupees 1 lakh
each, we dispose of the writ petition
finally with the observations that further
recovery proceedings pursuant to the
impugned
citation
dated
31.5.1994
(Annexure-15-A to the writ petition), will
remain stayed, provided the petitioners
deposit half of the amount as mentioned
in the aforesaid impugned citation upto
31.3.1995, and thereafter continue to
deposit monthly instalments of Rs. 1 lach
each. The first instalment shall be paid by
the petitioners on or before 30.4.1995 and
the remaining instalments shall be paid on
or before the last date of each succeeding
month. In case for default of any such
condition, the respondents will be free to
proceed against the petitioners."

4. From a bare perusal of the
aforementioned order it is crystal clear
that the petitioners had not pressed their
prayers either for quashing of the
proceedings and/or for restraining the
1All] The C/M, S.R.J. Intermediate College & another V. The D.E. and others 179
Respondent from proceeding further
with the proceedings, rather the only
prayer which they made was to fix
instalments so that they could clear off the
dues sought to be recovered which was
allowed on certain terms and conditions.
It appears from the submissions made at
the Bar that the petitioners failed to
comply with the terms and conditions
imposed by this Court.

5. Apparently, the prayers made by
the petitioners in this writ petition, which
were also made in the earlier writ petition,
were not granted. Thus, this writ petition
for the same relief's, which is second one,
in the absence of grant of leave to the
petitioners to sue afresh is barred by the
principle of res judicata/constructive res
judicata in view of the ratio decidentdi
laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in Sarguja Transport Service v. State
Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior
and others AIR 1987 Supreme Court 88
besides on the grounds of estoppel,
vaiver, acquiescence and abandonment
and thus, this writ petition is dismissed,
but without cost.

6. When we pointed out the
aforementioned legal position Sri Hajela,
learned counsel for the petitioners, very
fairly accepted it and thus we do not
impose cost on the petitioners.

Petition Dismissed.

25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
&,9,/ 6,'(
&,9,/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21·%/( 23 *$5* -
7+( +21·%/( 23 *$5* -

&LYLO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

7KH &RPPLWWHH RI 0DQDJHPHQW 6UL 5DP
-DQNL ,QWHUPHGLDWH &ROOHJH DQG $QRWKHU
«3HWLWLRQHUV
9HUVXV
7KH 'LUHFWRU RI (GXFDWLRQ 8WWDU 3UDGHVK
DQG RWKHUV
«5HVSRQGHQWV

&RXQVHO IRU WKH 3HWLWLRQHUV
6KUL $QDQG .XPDU *XSWD
6KUL 5DNHVK .XPDU
6KUL 56 0LVUD
&RXQVHO IRU WKH 5HVSRQGHQWV
6&
'U 5* 3DGLD
6KUL 3 3DGLD
6KUL 6. /DO
6KUL $ .XPDU
6KUL 5DNHVK .XPDU

&RQVWLWXWLRQ
RI
,QGLD
$UWLFOH

±
3HWLWLRQ
ILOHG
E\
ROG
&RPPLWWHH
RI
0DQDJHPHQW IRU UHPRYDO RI SULQFLSDOV
1HZ
&RPPLWWHH
RI
0DQDJHPHQW
DGRSWLQJ UHVROXWLRQ WR ZLWKGUDZ :ULW
3HWLWLRQ ± 0DLQWDLQDELOLW\ ± /RFXV VWDQGL
+HOG ± 3DUDV DQG
7KH IDFW UHPDLQV WKDW WKH UHVSRQGHQW 1R
 KDV EHHQ ZRUNLQJ RQ WKH SRVW RI
3ULQFLSDO
LQ
VSLWH
RI
WKH
2UGHU
RI
GLVPLVVDO 3DVVHG LQ WKH <HDU 7KH
VDLG 2UGHU ZDV QHYHU JLYHQ HIIHFW WR
7KHUH DUH DOVR GRFXPHQWV RQ UHFRUG WR
LQGLFDWH WKDW 6UL 6DQW 5DP &KDXGKDU DQG
6UL 5DP .LVKRUH 'DV %KLNDUL ZKR KDYH
ILOHG WKH SUHVHQW ZULW 3HWLWLRQ LQ RQH
FDSDFLW\ RU WKH 2WKHU KDG WKHPVHOYHV
EHHQ
UHVSRQVLEOH
WR
SHUPLW
WKH