# Manish v. State of U.P. and another

- **Citation:** (2008) 1 ILRA 274
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2008-02-19
- **Case number:** Criminal Misc. Application No. 1399 of 2008
- **Bench:** B.A. Zaidi
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/manish-v-state-of-u-p-and-another-41030
- **Pages:** 2

## Headnote

Constitution
of
India,
Art.
226Advertisment-application
be
send
through
Regd.
Post-petitioner
with
intention to ensure receiving within 24
hours-send
through speed post-both
services rendered by the India post and
Telegraph Department-authorities can
not refuse such application-send through
speed post.

Held: Para 6

In view of the above, I am of the opinion
that both Speed post or registered post
are services rendered by Indian Post and
Telegraph Department which ensures
strict delivery of post and mere making
clause
in
the
advertisement
that
application
will
be
sent
through
registered post, the respondent cannot
refuse the application of the petitioner
on the pretext that it had not been sent
by the registered post but had been sent
by the Speed Post which is equally
efficacious post.

## Text

274 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES [2008
of the First Statutes of the Universities
framed under-the provisions of U.P. State
of Universities Act, 1973.

24.

In
the
totality
of
the
circumstances, as noticed herein above,
we have no hesitation to record that the
order
of
Vice-Chancellor
of
the
University dated 8th September, 2007 is
illegal and deserves to be quashed. It is
ordered accordingly.

25. Let the Vice-Chancellor of the
University
re-examine
the
dispute
between
the parties qua officiating
appointment on the post of Principal of
the college in terms of the observations
made by us herein above afresh after
affording opportunity of hearing to the
parties concerned, by means of a reasoned
speaking order, preferably within four
weeks from the date a certified copy of
this order is filed before him.

26.

With
the
aforesaid
observations/directions, both the writ
petition no. 59709 of 2007 and writ
petition no. 57894 of 2007 are disposed of
finally.
---------
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 19.02.2008

BEFORE
THE HON'BLE B.A. ZAIDI, J.

Criminal Misc. Application No. 1399 of
2008

Manish

...Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. and another ...Respondents

Counsel for the Applicant:
Sri Raj Kumar
Counsel for the Opposite Parties:
Sri Mohammad Israil Siddiqui
A.G.A.

Code of Criminal Procedure-Section 482demand of local sureties-accused belong
to District Bulandshahr-Bail granted by
Session Judge Gautam Budh Nagar-heldorder
manifestly
callous
and
cruel
against in Moti Ram's case-order set a
side so for it concern to demand of local
sureties.

Held: Para 6

Even if, the aforesaid pronouncement of
the Supreme Court was not within the
knowledge of the learned Judge and was
not brought to his notice, the order is
manifestly callous and cruel. How will an
accused, who knows no one in a district,
where he is being prosecuted and
belongs to another district, would bring
local sureties. The amount of bail bond
also seems to be on higher side. This
order for demanding local sureties for an
amount of Rs.35,000/- each is set aside.
The learned Judge will rectify the order
accordingly.
Case law discussed:
AIR 1978 SC-1594 relied on.

(Delivered by Hon'ble B.A. Zaidi, J.)

1. In Case Crime No. 388/2007
under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C. Police
Station Sector-39 Noida district Gautam
Budh Nagar, bail was granted by Sessions
Judge (on 3.11.2007) and the accused
(applicant) was asked to furnish two local
sureties for a sum of 35,000/-.

2. The accused applied that he
belongs to Auraiya and it is difficult for
him to procure two local sureties and he
produced two sureties residents of district
Bulandshahr, which the Sessions Judge
declined to accept by order dated
15.11.2007 without giving any reason.
1 All] Manish V. State of U.P. and another
275

3. That is what brings the applicant
here under section 482 Cr.P.C.

4. Heard Sri Raj Kumar, Advocate
for the applicant and Sri Sri Mohammad
Israil
Siddiqui,
Addl
Government
Advocate for the State.

5. The order of Judge is violative of
Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as
held in the case of Moti Ram and others
versus State of Madhya Pradesh (AIR
1978 S.C. 1594), where the Hon'ble
Supreme Court held that demand of local
sureties is violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India.

6.

Even
if,
the
aforesaid
pronouncement of the Supreme Court was
not within the knowledge of the learned
Judge and was not brought to his notice,
the order is manifestly callous and cruel.
How will an accused, who knows no one
in a district, where he is being prosecuted
and belongs to another district, would
bring local sureties. The amount of bail
bond also seems to be on higher side. This
order for demanding local sureties for an
amount of Rs.35,000/- each is set aside.
The learned Judge will rectify the order
accordingly.

7. With these observations, the
application is disposed of.
---------
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 16.01.2008

BEFORE
THE HON'BLE BHARATI SAPRU, J.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1051 of 2008

Smt. Poonam Yadav

...Petitioner
Versus
Director Health Service Department and
others

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:
Sri Jawahar Yadav
Sri B.R. Sharma

Counsel for the Respondents:
S.C., Addl. Solicitor General of India

Constitution
of
India,
Art.
226Advertisment-application
be
send
through
Regd.
Post-petitioner
with
intention to ensure receiving within 24
hours-send
through speed post-both
services rendered by the India post and
Telegraph Department-authorities can
not refuse such application-send through
speed post.

Held: Para 6

In view of the above, I am of the opinion
that both Speed post or registered post
are services rendered by Indian Post and
Telegraph Department which ensures
strict delivery of post and mere making
clause
in
the
advertisement
that
application
will
be
sent
through
registered post, the respondent cannot
refuse the application of the petitioner
on the pretext that it had not been sent
by the registered post but had been sent
by the Speed Post which is equally
efficacious post.