# members of the staff can be allotted to the surplus process-serving staff, if any - **Citation:** C.L. No. 80 - **Court:** Allahabad High Court - **Decided:** 1961-04-13 - **Case number:** C.L. No. 80 - **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/members-of-the-staff-can-be-allotted-to-the-surplus-process-serving-staff-if-any-162219 - **Pages:** 3 ## Text 147 duties to the process-serving staff in the absence of enough work or to keep the posts in abeyance. While forwarding proposals for entertainment of peons, orderlies, bundle lifters, etc. mention may be made whether or not the work proposed to be allotted to those members of the staff can be allotted to the surplus process-serving staff, if any. (xiv) Peons for record-room G.L. No. 2628/385 dated 7th August 1912 District Judges should attach a peon to the record-room. He should in no case be a process-server and should not, so far as possible be changed. Changes in the record-room especially in the case of the low paid staff are to be deprecated and District Judges should satisfy themselves that employees in the record room are given no other work. (xv) Orderly peons C.L. No. 80 dated 7th August 1958, read with G.O. No. 1982-A/III-170K/1958 dated 16th June, 1958 The Government have decided that officers doing court work should not be allowed to retain more than two peons, be they orderly peons or court messangers. Accordingly the District Judges should not retain with them more than two peons. None of the two peons allowed to the District Judges should be attached with them outside normal office hours. (xvi) Peon for Amins C.L. No. 58/Vlc-3 dated 22nd May, 1961 Civil Court Amins are exempt from the operation of the orders contained in Government letter no. 708-A/III-22-K-1961, dated April 13, 1961 and are allowed to have peon. (xvii) Staff of Judge Family Court C.L. No. 7/Ve-4/ Admn.‟D‟ Sec: Dated: 1-4-1999 Provision for the staff of Judges Family court. The matter of regulating the services of Class III and Class IV employees appointed in Family Court in the State of Uttar Pradesh is in consideration of the Hon‟ble Court. Before finality is achieved the Hon‟b1e Court has issued the following directions for strict compliance by all. 1. No appointment/recruitment shall be made by the Judge Family Court in the State of Uttar Pradesh from the date of the issuance of the Circular order/ notification of any Class III or Class IV posts created in their Courts. 2. In case or any urgent circumstances which may require the necessity of further staff of class III and IV employees to the Family Court, the same may be met from the establishment of the district concerned in consultation with the Judge, Family Court. 148 3. In case of any demand being made during this period by the Judge, Family Court for Class III and Class IV employees theDistrict Judge of that district is directed to provide class III and Class IV employees from its establishment. I am, therefore, directed to commnunicate the aforesaid directions of the Court for strict compliance till further orders. (xviii) Drivers C.L.No. 50: Dated; August 29, 1996 Creation of the post of drivers in the pay scale of Rs. 950-20-1150-EB-25-1500. I am directed to send herewith a copy of the G.O. No. 797/VII-Nyay-9 (Budget) 20 (B) 95, dated March 14, 1996, on the above subject and to say that the Hon‟bie court has already given an order to M/s Hindustan Motors Limited, 9/1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Calcutta to supply 164 Cars of which the allocation of the Cars in the Judgeships are given herein as under: Name of Judgeships No. of Cars Agra .. 09 Kanpur Nagar .. 08 Varanasi .. 09 Ghaziabad .. 08 Mathura .. 05 Meerut .. l0 Moradabad .. 07 Azamgarh .. 06 Faizabad . 05 Jaunpur .. 05 Barabanki .. 04 Badaun .. 04 Deoria .. 05 Etawah .. 04 Bahraich .. 03 Allahabad .. 09 Lucknow .. 10 Deh radon .. 04 Haridwar .. 02 Nainital .. 02 Bareilly .. 07 Aligarh .. 06 Gorakhpur .. 06 Gonda .. 05 Muzaffar Nagar .. 05 Basti .. 04 Bulandshahar .. 04 Etah .. 04 Ghazipur .. 04 149 I am, therefore, to request you kindly to make the appointment of the drivers equal to the number of cars allotted to your Judgeship in the pay scale of RS. 950-201150-EB-25-1500, after the receipt of the cars from the authorised dealer M/s Hindustan Motors Ltd., Calcutta. C.L. No.39/ve-107/Admin. (D)/Dated: 5-9- 2007 Compensatory honorarium to the Drivers vide Office Memorandum. No. 4-E.M./90- Ka-4-2007, dated 6.7.2007. I am directed to enclose herewith the Officer Memorandum No.- 4- E.M./90-Ka4-2007, dated 6.7.2007 issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh, on the above subject and to request you to kindly follow the directions given therein. (xix) Typist for S.A.O. C.L. No. 123/Admn. (D) dated November 23,1994. I am directed to say that the Court has been pleased to order that a post of typist be created for the Senior Administrative Officer in your Judgeship. I am therefore, to ask you kindly to furnish your report in the light of G.O No 1924/Sat-Aa-Nya-13/89, dated 19.8.1988 issued on the subject.