# mentioned matters and a report be sent to the Court

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 11/Ve-40/Admn
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1987-02-11
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 11/Ve-40/Admn
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/mentioned-matters-and-a-report-be-sent-to-the-court-162312
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

193
I am also to add that the demands for maintenance of correct and up-to-date
account of G.P.F. is genuine and necessary directions be issued for its proper
maintenance.
It is, therefore, requested that necessary steps be taken in respect of above
mentioned matters and a report be sent to the Court.
[12] TRANSFER
(i) Munsarims
C.L. No. 11/Ve-40/Admn. (D) dated 11th February, 1987
Each District Judge is requested to send a report to the Court specifying therein the
information on the following points latest by 15th March:-
1.
Name of the Sadar Munsarim with home district.
2.
Date of appointment as Sadar Munsarim.
3.
Whether he has completed or will complete three years at his present
station on 15th March.
4.
Date of superannuation
5.
Confidential remarks.
Since it has been resolved by the Court to transfer the Sadar Munsarims who have
completed three year‟s stay at their respective stations, it is expedient that the Sadar
Munsarim may be asked to keep in readiness for transfer if he has completed three years.
He may also be asked to indicate and communicate through the District Judge the choice
of stations to which he may like to be transferred or make representation, if any, latest by
15th March. Beyond that date, the matter will not be considered after the orders of
transfer are passed by the Court.
In future whenever a new Sadar Munsarim is appointed or posted, his name and
date of appointment or posting as well as his date of superannuation should be
communicated to the Court immediately after his taking over as Sadar Munsarim for the
record of the court.
C.L. No. 52/Ve-40 dated 7th April, 1952
The District Judge should also confidentially report to the Registrar of the Court if
he would like his Sadar Munsarim to continue as such and whether he has received
complaint against him.
C.L. No. 41/Admn.-ve-40 dated 7th April, 1979
The District Judge should send the requisite report along with representations, if
any, with his comments.
C.L. No. 15/Ve-40 dated 9th February, 1970 and
C.L. No. 45/Ve-40 dated 26th March, 1974
Representations from the Munsarims who have been at a particular station for three
years and more and are due for transfer but whose transfer is likely to cause hardship
should be obtained and sent to the Court for consideration along with recommendations
keeping in mind the desirability of such a transfer.
194
C.L. No. 19 dated 1st February, 1969 as amended by
C.L. No, 88/Ve-40-Admn. (D) dated 24th July, 1979
While recommending transfers of Sadar Munsarims, District Judges should
see that the representations, if any, from such Munsarims as are due for transfer but
whose transfer is likely to cause some such hardship as may ultimately be considered to
be a genuine ground for cancelling their transfers are sent to the Court along with their
recommendations in the matter for consideration keeping in view the desirability of
transferring Sadar Munsarims after they have stayed at one station for three years or
more.
(ii) Other officials
C.L. No. 26/Ve-4 dated 10th April, 1950
Assistants should not, except on strong administrative grounds such as promotion
or punishment, be transfered from a station to which they belong or where they have
settled down for the time being to another station which is not their home district or
where they may find it difficult to get a house on rent having regard to their means; and
no assistant should ordinarily be retained on the same post for more than five years unless
his transfer to another post be impracticable or will not be in the interest of work.
(iii) Typists
G.L. No. 3/Ve-81 dated 27th February, 1952
As the outturn of a typist is more than that of an ordinary copyist, typist should not
be frequently transferred out of the copying office.
(iv) Interchange of duties
G.L. No. 5283/18-A-4(D) dated 23rd December, 1915
The practice of interchanging the duties of court officials without regard to the pay
which they may be drawing is open to objection and does not frequently lead to
efficiency. The practice, wherever it exists, shall at once cease.
(v) Peons
C.L. No. 98/Vlc-1 dated 21st December, 1973
The above directions do not apply to officials of the inferior establishment.
Ordinarily orderly peons should not be transferred unless under specific circumstances it
becomes administratively imperative to shift them or when it is conveniently possible to
do so on transfer of officers with whom they are attached.
C.L. No. 36/Vlc-10-Admn. (D) dated 22nd February, 1977
The Anjuman Himayat Chaprasian has made a grievance against transfer
of office bearers of the Anjuman to tahsil head quarters/outlying courts. The
Court has carefully considered the matter and has come to the conclusion that
although no hard and fast rule can be laid down in this regard, the exigencies and
convenience of the employees may be kept in view while making transfers.
(vi) On Shifting of Courts
C.L. No. 21/Ve-4 /Admn. (D) dated 16th May, 1995
Transfer of employees of subordinate courts appointed under rule 269 of G.R.
(Civil) in other district on shifting of court.