# MID TERM LOK SABHA ELECTION, 1999 - APPOINTMENT OF

- **Citation:** C.L.No.21/IVg-3/
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 2001-03-13
- **Case number:** C.L.No.21/IVg-3/
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/mid-term-lok-sabha-election-1999-appointment-of-163053
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

116
50
MID TERM LOK SABHA ELECTION, 1999 - APPOINTMENT OF
SECTOR MAGISTRATE AND PROVIDING OF STAFF CARS
C.L.No.21/IVg-3/ Admin.A-3/99 Dated: 27August, 1999
I am directed to say that some of the District Magistrates of this state have
requested for deployment of Judicial Magistrates as Sector Magistrates and using of Staff
cars for election duties and to inform that the Court has been pleased to order that only
such number of Magistrates and staff may be sent for election work who can be spared
without seriously affecting functioning of Courts. Staff cars cannot be spared.
51.
REGARDING RETURN OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT NOTICES OR
ITS SERVICE REPORTS.
C.L.No. 11/Sec./2001/Supreme Court Appeal Dated 13 March, 2001
I am directed to requests you not to send any notice or service report directly to
Hon'ble Supreme Court if the same has been issued by this Registry for effecting service
upon the respondents such notices or service reports henceforth shall be returned to this
court and thereafter certificate of service will be transmitted by this Court to the Apex
Court as per direction contained in Hon'ble Supreme Court's letter No. D
No.4701/2000/XVIA dated 7.12.2000 in connection with transfer petition © Nos. 573579 of 2000.
52.
OBSERVANCE OF YEAR COMMENCING FROM 1st OF JANUARY,
2004 as ―ARREARS CLEARANCE YEAR‖
C.L. No.45/2003 Dated 20th December, 2003
As per resolutions passed in the Chief Justice Conference 2003 the year
commencing from 1st January, 2004 is to be observed in all over the country as the
―Arrears Clearance year‖
To make successful Arrears are to be cleared in the subordinate courts by
effective and improved Court Management.
I am, therefore, directed to request you to kindly circulate among the judicial
officers posted in your Judgeship for its strict compliance.
53.
TO ENSURE STRICT COMPLIACE OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT PASSED IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL
LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 9140 of 2003 : CH. VENKATESHWAR RAO
V. THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH, HYDERABAD, A.P. & ANOTHER
C.L. No. 30/2003, Dated 19 August, 2003
The Hon'ble Supreme court in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.9140 of
2003:Ch Venkatesnwar Rao Vs. The Registrar (Administration) High Court of Andhra
Parades, Hyderabad, A.P.& Anr. has observed with concerned that in District Courts
charge sheets has been found lying with concerned staff without any action having been
taken by verifying them and placed them before the Presiding Officer and in some
preliminary registered case, records were not sent to the Sessions Court even after
committal of the cases. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed that several
117
unregistered private complaints, unregistered criminal miscellaneous petitions in
maintenance cases, unregistered maintenance cases and criminal miscellaneous petitions
were not called and were not placed before the Presiding Officer.
I am, therefore, directed to send herewith a copy of Order Dated 5.5.2003 passed by
Hon'ble Supreme Court in petition for special Leave to appeal (C) No.914:Ch.
Venkateshwar Rao Vs. The Registrar (administration) High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hyderabad, A.P.& Anr. For your Information and necessary action.
54.
NON COMPLIANCE OF THE PROVISIONS AS CONTAINED IN SUB
RULE 6 OF RULE 196 OF THE CENTRAL RULES (CIVIL), 1957 VOL. I
AND RULE 18 OF CHAPTER 12 OF GENERAL RULE (CRIMINAL),
1997 BY THE SUBORDINATE COURTS.
C.L.No. 12 /2004: Dated: 31st March, 2004
The Hon'ble court in the past has issued circular letter No.2dated 2.1.1984, C.L.
No. 38 dated 11.8.2000 and C.L.No.9dated 4.3.2003 whereby directions were issued that
the provisions as contained in first & second proviso of sub Rule (6) of Rule 196 of the
General Rules (civil) 1957, Volume I and Rule 118 of Chapter XII of General Rules
(criminal) 1977 be followed strictly but time and again the Hon'ble Court is noticing that
the aforesaid provisions are still not being complied with strictly causing much
inconvenience in the proceedings of the cases filled in the court.

 In continuation of the courts circular letters referred to above. I am sanding
herewith a copy of order dated 14.1.2004 passed by the court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice
R.S.Tripathi) in Criminal Revision No.54 of 1986 wherein the Hon'ble court has
observed with concern that in several cases when the original record s requisitioned by
the court it has been found that the record has been weeded out
 I am, therefore directed to say you to kindly comply with the directions as
contained in the court's circular letter strictly and the original records of all those cases in
which stay/bail orders are communicated after filing of records/ appeal before this court
be preserved.
55. MORNING COURT IN THE DISTRICTS.
C.L.No. 15/ Main P/Admin. A-3 dated 19 April, 2004

 I am directed to inform you that the matter regarding functioning of the Morning
courts was considered by the Hon'ble Court and the Hon'ble court has been pleased to
resolve that the courts in all the District shall function from 10.30 A.M. to 4.00 P.M.
even during the month of May and June.
56.
UNAUTHORIZED
PERSONS
WORKING
IN
THE
OFFICES
OF
SUBORDINATE COURTS AND HANDLING THE GOVERNMENT WORK
AND RECORDS.
C.L.No. 27/ dated: 15th September, 2004
 In C.M. writ Petition No. 32455 of 2004-Vimal Kishore Nigam Vs. state of
U.P. & others , the Hon'ble court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sunil Ambwani) has observed
with serious concern that there is an alarming situation of gross indiscipline prevalent in