# Nitin Arora v. State of U.P. & Ors

- **Citation:** (2020) 9 ILRA 386
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2020-07-28
- **Case number:** Matters Under Article 227 No. 2230 of 2020
- **Bench:** Gautam Chowdhary
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/nitin-arora-v-state-of-u-p-ors-45957
- **Pages:** 5

## Headnote

A. Criminal Law - Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 - Section 200, 202 - Indian Evidence
Act, 1872- Section 101 - Burden of Proof -
The petitioner asserts that the respondent
along with his daughter took jewelry and
left the matrimonial home to move to her
father's house. But the lower court observes
that the petitioner failed to disclose neither
in the complaint nor in his statement the
owner of those jewelry. Since the burden to
prove the description of jewelry therefore
he ought to have provided any list or receipt
of jewelry which kept missing from his
house. (Para 10)
B. Jurisdiction - the petitioner claims that
when he went to her father's house at Preet
Vihar, New Delhi he was ill-treated. The Hon'ble
High Court appreciates the order of the lower
court deciding not to intervene in the matter as
it lies under the jurisdiction of the Delhi court
and not Ghaziabad court. (Para 16)
Writ Petition Rejected. (E-10)

List of Cases cited: -

## Text

386 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
educational facilities, the opportunities
available and the overall environment
which is conducive to overall development
of the child. The court may also consider
any other factors, which it deems are
relevant to determine the best interests of
the child.

21. During the pendency of the suit
proceedings, it is open to the respondent to
file an application for interim visitation
rights. In case such application is filed, it
shall be considered at the earliest and on
top priority by the learned trial court in
accordance with law.

22. It is open to both parties to raise
all issues on merits regarding the welfare of
the child, before the learned trial court, and
the same shall be considered by the learned
trial court in accordance with law, and
consistent with the observations made
above.

23. The petition is disposed of finally.
----------
(2020)09ILR A386
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 28.07.2020

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

Matters Under Article 227 No. 2230 of 2020
(Criminal)

Nitin Arora ...Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. ...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner:
Madan Lal Rai

Counsel for the Opposite Parties:
G.A.
A. Criminal Law - Criminal Procedure Code,
1973 - Section 200, 202 - Indian Evidence
Act, 1872- Section 101 - Burden of Proof -
The petitioner asserts that the respondent
along with his daughter took jewelry and
left the matrimonial home to move to her
father's house. But the lower court observes
that the petitioner failed to disclose neither
in the complaint nor in his statement the
owner of those jewelry. Since the burden to
prove the description of jewelry therefore
he ought to have provided any list or receipt
of jewelry which kept missing from his
house. (Para 10)
B. Jurisdiction - the petitioner claims that
when he went to her father's house at Preet
Vihar, New Delhi he was ill-treated. The Hon'ble
High Court appreciates the order of the lower
court deciding not to intervene in the matter as
it lies under the jurisdiction of the Delhi court
and not Ghaziabad court. (Para 16)
Writ Petition Rejected. (E-10)

List of Cases cited: -

1. Vijay Dhanuka etc. Vs Najima Mamtaj etc.
(2014) 14 SCC 638

(Delivered by Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.)

1& Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds
vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk] ifjokn okn la0 5069 lu
2018] fufru vjksM+k olsZl lksfu;k eYgks=k ,.M
vnlZ esa vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] dksVZ ua0 3]
xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr rych vkns'k fn0
29&7&2019] ftlds }kjk ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr
ifjokn i;kZIr lk{; ds vHkko esa /kkjk 203
na0iz0la0 ds rgr fujLr fd;k x;k gS ,oa blds
fo:) nk;j fdzfeuy fjohtu ua0 325 lu 2019]
fufru vjksM+k olsZl lksfu;k eYgks=k ,.M vnlZ esa
vij ftyk ,oa l= U;k;k/kh'k] dksVZ ua0 17]
xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fn0 30&11&2019]
ftlds }kjk fuxjkuh fujLr dh x;h gS] ds
fo:) ;ksftr dh x;h gSA

2& ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh enu
yky jk; ,oa m0 iz0 jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku
9 All. Nitin Arora Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
387
vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk Jh iz'kkar dqekj ds
lg;ksxh vf/koDrk Jh ih0 ds0'kkgh dks lquk rFkk
i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

3& ifjokn i= ds vuqlkj okn ds rF; la{ksi
esa bl izdkj gSa fd ifjoknh fufru vjksM+k dk fookg
foi{kh la0 1 lksfu;k eYgks=k ds lkFk fn0 4&2&2016 dks
xkft;kckn esa laiUu gqvk rFkk muds ikfjokfjd lEcU/kksa
ds fuoZgu ls fn0 17&1&2017 dks ,d iq=h dk tUe
gqvk] ifjoknh ds vuqlkj fookg ds i'pkr~ mlus foi{kh
la0 1 dks leLr lq[k lqfo/kk,a miyC/k djk;h Fkh ,oa
[kq'k j[kus dk gj lEHko iz;kl fd;k] foi{kh la0 1 fookg
ds iwoZ ls gh vkj0th0 LVksu vLirky izhr fogkj fnYyh
esa lhfu;j LVkQ ulZ ds in ij dk;Z djrh gS] tgkW ls
foi{kh la0 1 dks :0 20]000@& izfrekg osru izkIr gksrk
gS] foi{kh la0 1 fookg ds mijkar ls gh ifjoknh ij vius
ek;ds esa jgus dk ncko cukrh Fkh vkSj dgrh Fkh fd
ifjoknh ds ogkW jgus ij og viuh ukSdjh vklkuh ls
djsxh rFkk ifjoknh dh Hkh ukSdjh yxok nsxh] ifjoknh
}kjk ,slk djus esa vleFkZrk tkfgj djus ij foi{kh la0
1 ifjoknh ls yM+kbZ >xM+k djrh rFkk >wBs eqdnesa esa
QWlkus dh /kedh nsrh FkhA fn0 24&3&2017 dks foi{kh
la0 1 vius firk ds lkFk ?kj esa j[ks dherh tsoj] :0
37000@&uxn ,oa diM+s ysdj viuh fj'rsnkjh esa 'kknh
dk cgkuk djds rhu fnu ds fy, dgdj x;h rFkk rc
ls og okil ugha vk;h] ifjoknh us mls ykus dk vusdksa
iz;kl fd;k fdUrq og ugha vk;h rFkk vc ogkW tkus ij
og ifjoknh ls nqO;Zogkj djrs gq, >wBs eqdnesa esa QWlkus
o tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nsrh gSA ifjoknh us foi{kh la0
1 dks :i;k o tsoj ysdj ?kj okil vkus gsrq vius
vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls uksfVl Hkstok;h ijUrq uksfVl izkIr
gksus ds mijkUr Hkh og okil ugha vk;h] ifjoknh bl
laca/k esa fjiksVZ fy[kkus Fkkuk ij x;k rks mldh fjiksVZ
ugha fy[kh x;h] ifjoknh }kjk ofj"B iqfyl v/kh{kd]
xkft;kckn dks Hkh bl laca/k esa izkFkZuk i= fn;k x;k]
ftl ij dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha gq;h rc ifjoknh }kjk
U;k;ky; ds le{k ;g ifjokn i= nkf[ky fd;k x;kA

4& ifjokn ds leFkZu esa ifjoknh us /kkjk
200 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr Lo;a dks rFkk /kkjk 202
na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr lk{khx.k lqHkk"k pUnz o
Jherh jkuh vjksM+k dks ijhf{kr djk;kA

5& ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ
izLrqr fd;k fd vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV }kjk
ifjokn fujLr djus esa rF;ksa ij /;ku ugha fn;k
x;k rFkk vkns'k fn0 29&7&2019 fof/k fo:)
<ax ls ikfjr fd;k x;k gS D;ksafd muds }kjk
i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dks xzg.k u djds]
lk{; xzg.k u djus okys lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij
iz'uxr vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] bl izdkj iz'uxr
vkns'k ikfjr djrs le; U;kf;d ef"r"d dk
mi;ksx ugha fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku
gS fd ;kph us /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr
Lo;a dks rFkk /kkjk 202 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr
lk{khx.k dks ijhf{kr djk;k] fdUrq U;k;ky; }kjk
mDr leLr rF;ksa dh vuns[kh djrs gq, iz'uxr
fu.kZ; ,oa vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA

;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us ;g Hkh rdZ
izLrqr fd;k fd fo}ku iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; us Hkh
muds mijksDr dFkuksa dh vuns[kh djrs gq, vius
fu.kZ; fn0 30&11&2019 }kjk] fo}ku vij eq[;
U;kf;d eftLVzsV }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fn0 29&7&2019
dh iqf"V djrs gq, iqujh{k.k fujLr djus esa =qfV dh
gS] blfy, voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr nksuksa iz'uxr
fu.kZ;ksa dks vikLr fd;k tk;A

6& fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us rdZ
izLrqr fd;k fd fo}ku vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV
}kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k leLr izi=ksa dk lE;d
:is.k ifj'khyu ,oa fo'ys"k.k djus ds mijkUr
ldkj.k fof/k lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS]
ftlds ckjs esa ;kph }kjk lanfHkZr vkifRr fujk/kkj gSA
mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk
Hkh ;kph dh leLr vkifRr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr i=koyh
ij miyC/k leLr vfHkys[kh; lk{;ksa ,oa voj
U;k;ky; ds iz'uxr fu.kZ; ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd
fopkjksijkUr nkf.Md iqujh{k.k fujLr fd;k x;k gSA
nksuksa iz'uxr vkns'k fcYdqy lgh <ax ls ikfjr fd,
x, gSa] muesa dksbZ fof/kd ;k {ks=kf/kdkj laca/kh =qfV
ugha gS] ;g ;kfpdk cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus
;ksX; gSA

7& eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds
rdksZ ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd fopkj fd;k rFkk i=koyh ij
miyC/k leLr vfHkys[k; lk{;ksa ,oa mijksDr nksuksa
iz'uxr fu.kZ;ksa dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

8& vkns'k fn0 29&7&2019 esa fo}ku
vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV }kjk ;g ik;k x;k
388 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
gS fd ifjoknh us vius c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 200
na0iz0la0 esa ;g dFku fd;k gS fd mldh iRuh
'kknh ds vxys fnu ls gh dgus yxh fd vyx
edku ysdj jgsaxs] fn0 23&3&2017 dks og
mldh iq=h dks ysdj vius firk ds lkFk tsoj o
uxnh vkfn ysdj pyh x;h] ;gkW ij ifjoknh us
u rks ifjokn i= esa vkSj u gh vius c;ku esa ;g
Li"V fd;k gS fd mDr tsoj fdl O;fDr ds
LoRo ds Fks rFkk ;fn mDr tsoj ifjoknh }kjk
foi{kh la0 1 dks U;Lr djk;k x;k rks og dc
U;Lr djk;k x;kA i=koyh ij fdlh Hkh lkeku
dh lwph o mls dz; djus dh dksbZ jlhn o LoRo
dk dkxt Hkh ifjoknh }kjk nkf[ky ugha fd;k
x;kA tgkW rd foi{kh la0 1 }kjk ifjoknh ds
lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd, tkus dk iz'u gS] bl ckjs
esa ifjoknh us Lo;a vius c;ku esa ;g Lohdkj
fd;k gS fd tc og viuh iRuh dks ysus ds fy,
mlds ?kj ij x;k Fkk rc ogkW ij foi{khx.k us
mlds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd;k Fkk] bl izdkj
ifjoknh ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj izhr fogkj ubZ
fnYyh esa gqvk] ftlds lEcU/k esa xkft;kckn
U;k;ky; dks dksbZ {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gS] bl izdkj
bu fcUnqvksa ds vk/kkj ij ifjoknh dk ifjokn
/kkjk 203 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr fujLr dj fn;k
x;kA

9& ifjoknh }kjk bl fu.kZ; ,oa vkns'k ls
{kqC/k gksdj] vkijkf/kd iqujh{k.k la0 325 lu
2019 nkf[ky fd;k x;k] ftldk fuLrkj.k fo}ku
vij ftyk ,oa l= U;k;k/kh'k] dksVZ ua0 17]
xkft;kckn ds fu.kZ; fn0 30&11&2019 }kjk
fd;k x;kA ifjoknh }kjk mBk;h x;h vkifRr;ksa
ds en~nsutj fo}ku vij ftyk ,oa l=
U;k;k/kh'k U;k;ky; }kjk ifjokn la0 5069@2018
rFkk mlds leFkZu esa ys[kc) /kkjk 200 ,oa 202
na0iz0la0 ds c;kuksa] foi{kh la0 1 dks izsf"kr uksfVl
fnukafdr 14&8&2018 dk ifj'khyu fd;k] ftuesa
dgha Hkh ;g ugha ik;k x;k fd iz'uxr tsoj]
udnh ,oa dherh diM+s ifjoknh }kjk foi{kh la0
1 dks U;Lr fd;s x;s ,oa mDr oLrqvksa dk
okLrfod Lokeh dkSu gS] ;fn mDr oLrqvksa dk
Lokeh ifjoknh Fkk rks mls izekf.kr djus dh
izkjfEHkd ,oa izFke n`"V;k ftEesnkjh ifjoknh dh
gh FkhA ifjoknh }kjk ,slk dksbZ lk{; u rks
fo}ku eftLVzsV ds U;k;ky; esa vkSj u gh
iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k fd
ifjokn i= esa of.kZr xgus ifjoknh ds gSa] tgkW
rd ifjoknh fufur vjksM+k }kjk Lo;a ds xgus ys
tkus dk dFku fd;k x;k gS ogha blds foijhr
ifjoknh ds xokg ih0MCyw0&2 Jherh jkuh vjksM+k
ds c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 202 na0iz0la0 esa Lo;a ds
xgus ys tkus dk rF; lkeus vk;k gSA bl lUnHkZ
esa lkf{k;ksa ds c;ku esa fojks/kkHkk"k gSA

10& eSaus i=koyh ij miyC/k nksuksa voj
U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dk xgurkiwoZd ifj'khyu
fd;kA ifjoknh ds /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku esa
dgk x;k gS fd fn0 23&3&2017 dks foi{kh la0
2 mldh iq=h dks ysdj vius firk ds lkFk pyh
xbZ vkSj og vius lkFk tsoj Hkh ysdj xbZ FkhA
;gkW ij ifjoknh us u rks ifjokn&i= esa vkSj u
gh vius mDr c;ku esa ;g Li"V fd;k gS fd
mDr tsoj fdl O;fDr ds LoRo ds Fks rFkk
i=koyh ij fdlh Hkh lkeku dh lwph o mls dz;
djus dh dksbZ jlhn o LoRo dk dkxt Hkh
nkf[ky ugha gSA tcfd ;fn mDr tsoj ifjoknh
ds Fks rks bls lkfcr djus dk Hkkj Hkkjrh; lk{;
vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 101 ds vUrxZr ifjoknh dk
gh gSA bl laca/k esa Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e dh
/kkjk 101 fuEuor gS %&

**101& lcwr dk Hkkj & tks dksbZ
U;k;ky; ls ;g pkgrk gS fd og ,sls fdlh
fof/kd vf/kdkj ;k nkf;Ro ds ckjs esa fu.kZ; ns]
tks mu rF;ksa ds vfLrRo ij fuHkZj gS] ftUgsa og
izk[;kr djrk gS] mls lkfcr djuk gksxk fd mu
rF;ksa dk vfLrRo gSA

tc dksbZ O;fDr fdlh rF; dk
vfLrRo lkfcr djus ds fy, vkc) gS] rc ;g
dgk tkrk gS fd ml O;fDr ij lcwr dk Hkkj
gS**

11& tgkW rd foi{kh }kjk ifjoknh ds
lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd, tkus dk dFku fd;k
x;k gS] bl lanHkZ esa ifjoknh us vius c;ku esa
;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd tc og viuh iRuh dks
ysus ds fy, mlds ?kj izhr fogkj ubZ fnYyh x;k
Fkk] rc ogkW ij foi{khx.k us mlds lkFk vHknz
O;ogkj fd;kA bl laca/k esa voj U;k;ky; us
fu.khZr fd;k gS fd pwWfd ifjoknh ds lkFk vHknz
9 All. Nitin Arora Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
389
O;ogkj izhr fogkj ubZ fnYyh esa gqvk] ftlds
lEcU/k esa muds U;k;ky; dks {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gSA
bl laca/k esa Vijay Dhanuka etc. Vs. Najima
Mamtaj etc. 2014 (14) SCC 638 esa ekuuh;
mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk
fuEuor gS%&

"202. Postponement of issue of
process.-(1) Any Magistrate, on receipt of a
complaint of an offence of which he is
authorised to take cognizance or which has
been made over to him under section 192,
may, if he thinks fit, and shall, in a case
where the accused is residing at a place
beyond the area in which he exercises his
jurisdiction postpone the issue of process
against the accused, and either inquire into
the case himself or direct an investigation to
be made by a police officer or by such other
person as he thinks fit, for the purpose of
deciding whether or not there is sufficient
ground for proceeding:

Provided that no such direction
for investigation shall be made-

(a)where it appears to the
Magistrate that the offence complained
of is triable exclusively by the Court of
Sessions; or

(b)where the complaint has not
been made by a Court, unless the
complainant and the witnesses present, if
any, have been examined on oath under
Section 200.

(2) In an inquiry under subsection(1), the Magistrate may, if he thinks
fit, take evidence of witness on oath:

Provided that if it appears to
the
Magistrate
that
the
offence
complained of is triable exclusively by
the court of Session, he shall call upon
the complainant to produce all his
witnesses and examine them on oath."

12& bl izdkj fo}ku vij eq[; U;kf;d
eftLVzsV] xkft;kckn }kjk ifjoknh dk ifjokn
na0iz0la0 dh /kkjk 203 ds vUrxZr fujLr fd;k
x;k gSA ;gkW ij na0iz0la0 dh /kkjk 203 Hkh
mn~/k`r fd;k tkuk vko';d gS] tks bl izdkj gS
%&

**;fn ifjoknh ds vkSj lkf{k;ksa ds
'kiFk ij fd, x, dFku ij (;fn dksbZ gks)] vkSj
/kkjk 202 ds v/khu tkap ;k vUos"k.k ds (;fn dksbZ
gks) ifj.kke ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~] eftLVzsV
dh ;g jk; gS fd dk;Zokgh djus ds fy, i;kZIr
vk/kkj ugha gS rks og ifjokn dks [kkfjt dj nsxk
vkSj ,sls izR;sd ekeys esa og ,slk djus ds vius
dkj.kksa dks la{ksi esa vfHkfyf[kr djsxkA**

13& esjs fopkj ls fo}ku vij eq[;
U;kf;d eftLVzsV] dksVZ la0 3] xkft;kckn us
miyC/k lk{; dk HkyhHkkafr fo'ys"k.k djrs gq,
foLr`r ,oa rdZ lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gSA
lkf{k;ksa ds c;ku esa egRoiw.kZ fojks/kkHkk"k ;g gS fd
foi{kh la0 1 }kjk ys tk, x, xgus fdlds Fks]
fo}ku eftLVzsV U;k;ky; }kjk blh vk/kkj ij
miyC/k lk{; dk fo'ys"k.k djrs gq, lanfHkZr
izdj.k esa foi{khx.k dks ryc u djus dk vk/kkj
ik;k x;k gS] mDr vk/kkj rdZ lEer gSA

14& tgkW rd fo}ku eftLVzsV U;k;ky; ds
vkns'k esa mUgsa okn dk {ks=kf/kdkj u gksus ds laca/k esa
dgh x;h ckr dk iz'u gS] bl laca/k esa U;k;ky; us
ifjoknh ds c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 esa ik;k
gS fd ifjoknh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd tc og
viuh iRuh dks ysus ds fy, mlds ?kj ij x;k rc
ogkW ij foi{khx.k us mlds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj fd;k]
vr% ifjoknh ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj izhr fogkj ubZ
fnYyh esa gqvk] ftlds lEcU/k esa xkft;kckn
U;k;ky; dks {ks=kf/kdkj izkIr ugha gSA pwWfd ;g rF;
Lo;a ifjoknh ds /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku esa gh
vk;k gS] vr% bl fcUnq ij fo}ku eftLVzsV U;k;ky;
}kjk fn;k x;k fu.kZ; fcYdqy lgh gS] blesa dksbZ
=qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS rFkk bl fcUnq ij fn,
x, fu.kZ; dh iqf"V djus esa fo}ku iqujh{k.k
U;k;ky; }kjk Hkh dksbZ =qfV ugha dh x;h gSA

15& ifjoknh }kjk iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; esa
vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa fof/k O;oLFkk fel lksfu;k
xksfoUn fxMokuh izfr LVsV vkQ ;w0ih0
(,p0lh0) ,0lh0lh0 312] 2013 (83)] eS0
390 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
th0,p0lh0,y0 ,EiykbZt LVksd vksi'ku VzLV
cuke eS0 bf.M;k buQksykbu fy0 ,0vkbZ0vkj0
2013 (lq0dks0) 1433 ij fo'okl O;Dr fd;k x;k
gSA iqujh{k.k dk fuLrkj.k djrs le; iqujh{k.k
U;k;ky; }kjk rFkk bl Lrj ij Lo;a esjs }kjk bu
fof/k O;oLFkkvksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA esjs fopkj
ls ifjoknh ds ifjokn esa mDr izFke n`"V;k rF;ksa
dk vHkko gS rFkk mDr fof/k O;oLFkkvksa dk ykHk
ifjoknh dks ugha iznku fd;k tk ldrkA

16& ifjoknh ds c;ku ls Li"V gks jgk gS
fd ifjoknh ds lkFk vHknz O;ogkj dh ?kVuk fnYyh
esa ?kfVr gq;h gS] blfy, xkft;kckn U;k;ky; dks
mDr ekeys dks lquus dk {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gSA bl
ckjs esa fo}ku vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV]
xkft;kckn dk vfHker fcYdqy lgh gS rFkk
mifjof.kZr nksuksa vk/kkjksa ij fo}ku eftLVzsV }kjk
ifjoknh dk ifjokn /kkjk 203 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr
fujLr djus esa dksbZ =qfV ugha dh x;h gSA

17& iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk Hkh ifjokn
i=] ifjoknh }kjk foi{kh la0 1 dks nh x;h
uksfVl] ifjoknh ds /kkjk 200 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr
fn, x, c;ku] mlds lkf{k;ksa ds /kkjk 202
na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr fn, x, c;ku dk ifj'khyu
djrs gq,] fojks/kkHkk"kh rF;ksa dk mtkxj vius
fu.kZ;ksa esa fd;k gSA

18& bl izdkj nksuksa voj U;k;ky;ksa }kjk
ikfjr mijksDr nksuksa iz'uxr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns'k esa
fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS]
vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] dksVZ ua0 13]
xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fn0 29&7&2019
,oa fdzfeuy fjohtu ua0 325 lu 2019] fufru
vjksM+k olsZl lksfu;k eYgks=k ,.M vnlZ esa vij
ftyk ,oa l= U;k;k/kh'k] dksVZ ua0 17]
xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns'k fn0
30&11&2019 esa gLr{ksi fd, tkus dk dksbZ
vkSfpR; ugha gS blfy, nksuksa iz'uxr fu.kZ; ,oa
vkns'kksa dh iqf"V dh tkrh gS rFkk ;g ;kfpdk
cyghu gksus ds dkj.k fujLr dh tkrh gSA

19& vUrfje vkns'k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls
lekIr le>k tk;A
----------
(2020)09ILR A390
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 27.02.2020

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, J.

Application U/S 482 No. 4496 of 2020

Mohit & Anr. ...Applicants
Versus
State of U.P. & Anr. ...Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Applicants:
Sri A.Z. Khan

Counsel for the Opposite Parties:
A.G.A.

Criminal Law -Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973- Section 482- Present applicants are
named accused persons - On the basis of
the statement, recorded, under Section 161
of Cr.P.C., cognizance was taken for which
there was, prima facie, sufficient evidence
on
record.
Plea
of
alibi
and
other
arguments regarding facts are to be seen
by the Trial court. This Court, in exercise of
inherent power, under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C., is not expected to embark upon
factual matrix because the same is to be
gone into, during course of trial, by the
Trial court.

Only prima facie case on the basis of evidence
collected during investigation has to be seen at
the stage of taking cognizance of the offences
and disputed questions of fact cannot be looked
into by the Court in the exercise of its inherent
power under section 482 of the Cr.Pc.

Criminal Application rejected. (Para 5, 6, 9) (E-3)

Case Law relied upon/ Discussed: -.

1. St. of A.P Vs Gaurishetty Mahesh, JT 2010 (6)
SC 588: (2010) 6 SCALE 767: 2010 Cr. LJ 3844

2. Hamida Vs Rashid, (2008) 1 SCC 474