# objectionable as it contravenes the provisions of rule 267, Chapter X of General Rules

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 95-1
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1957-10-19
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 95-1
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/objectionable-as-it-contravenes-the-provisions-of-rule-267-chapter-x-of-general-162206
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

144
C.L. No. 95-1 dated 19th October, 1957

The practice of allowing the Head Copyist the assistance of a copyist who, in lieu
of the assistance rendered by him, is exempted from giving his daily outturn of work is
objectionable as it contravenes the provisions of rule 267, Chapter X of General Rules
(Civil), 1957.

Previous sanction of the Court may, however, be obtained where it is considered
necessary to exempt a copyist from doing copying work.
C.L. No. 31/VIIIb-1 dated 27th April, 1963
As far as practicable, English and Hindi typists should work on English and Hindi
typewriter respectively and should not be permitted to prepare copies by hand.
(vii) Temporary execution clerks
C.L. No. 114 dated 13th November, 1953
Whenever execution work falls heavily in arrears on account of creation of
additional courts, proposal for appointment of an execution clerk for the permanent or
temporary court of Civil Judge or Munsif, as the case may be, may be submitted to the
Court with facts and figures in support of the case.
(viii) Additional staff for temporary and Honorary Courts
C.L. No. 73/B dated 30th October, 1950
Temporary staff of additional courts should, unless there are orders to the
contrary, be employed only from the date the presiding officer takes over charge and
should be disbanded on the presiding officer handing over charge or the court becoming
vacant as the case may be.
G.L. No. 53/B dated 18th September, 1934
The Staff attached to a temporary court such as that of a temporary Additional
District and Sessions Judge which is provided for a specified period should, in the
interest of economy, be dismissed when the court has been expressly held in obeyance or
when the presiding officer goes on leave for more days and no substitute is provided.
After the temporary court has been revived or on the return of the presiding
officer from leave, the sanctioned staff should be re-employed.
C.E, No. 40/IXg-19 dated 19th June, 1964
As a measure of economy, Government have decided that on the non-plan side,
except in Public Sector commercial takings, staff for new offices and new schemes under
the heads of department should be drawn from the existing staff under their control by
internal rearrangement and the powers to create temporary posts delegated to them should
be exercised only when it is necessary to abolish a post and to create another in its place
with a view to giving effect to such rearrangement. When it is absolutely impossible to
make any such adjustments and entertainment of new staff is unavoidable the matter
should be referred to the Government in the administrative department.