# of the District Judge, also interviews granted to officers seeking them

- **Citation:** C.L. NO. 5101/IC-34
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1921-01-11
- **Case number:** C.L. NO. 5101/IC-34
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/of-the-district-judge-also-interviews-granted-to-officers-seeking-them-162609
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

318
(2)
Meeting with all the civil judicial officers at the station collectively and
individual interviews for any of them who want it. At the meeting of all
the judicial officers the District Judge should have ready a statement
showing the names of the officers, dates of their posting in the district and
their powers. This meeting may conveniently take place in the chambers
of the District Judge, also interviews granted to officers seeking them.
(3)
A visit to the Civil Court Bar Association. It must be explained to the
President that it is an informal visit in which there should be no speeches
or welcome address of any kind, no refreshments and no garlanding. The
visit would take 30-45 minutes. The most convenient time for this visit
would be during lunch interval. Otherwise it can be just after the work of
the day is over or just before the work starts.
(4)
Interviews with leading members of the Bar, 5 to 8, depending upon the
importance of the Bar Association. It may be better for the District Judge
to get the list from the President of the Civil Court Bar Association, but he
may for good reasons amend it by additions, subtraction or alteration.
Each interview may be allowed 10-15 minutes. These interviews may take
place at the place of stay or in the District Judge‟s chambers. If any
member of the Bar not in the list asks for an interview it should be
arranged for and five minutes may be allowed to him.
The District Judge should see that the Food Control Order, if any, in force in the
district, is not infringed in connection with any function to which the Administrative
Judge is invited. No permission from the District Magistrate should be obtained for any
such function.
C.L. NO. 5101/IC-34 DATED 9TH MAY, 1950

Paragraph 204 of the Police Regulation is reproduced below for the information
of and necessary action at the proper time by all District Judges and Additional District
Judges and Munsifs not at the headquarters of the Judgeship:
"204. A guard of one head constable and three constables will be provided for the
Commissioner of a Division, the Inspector General of Police and the Deputy Inspector
General of Police when on tour. A similar guard may also be provided at places other
than Allahabad and Lucknow for the Hon‟ble Judge of the High Court and the
Administrative Member of the Board of Revenue when he visits such places during the
course of his tour of inspection.
Such guards may be supplied by the Superintendent of each district, which the
officers on tour visit. The Superintendent of Police of such district will, if necessary,
apply to the Deputy Inspector General of Police for relief from his range reserve in which
allowance for such claims have been made.
319
4.
INSPECTION BY DISTRICT JUDGE
C.L. NO. 79 DATED 15TH DECEMBER, 1960

The District Judge should inspect the work of the new Munsif posted to his
district on his first appointment, within three months of his posting and should submit to
the High Court the inspection note recorded by him without waiting for the compliance.
C.L. NO. 2437 DATED 27TH JULY, 1903

Court has had occasion to notice that some District Judges, in submitting their
notes of inspection of subordinate courts, forwarded at the same time a report by their
Munsarim on the working of certain department of the office under inspection. The Court
has no objection to a subordinate official being deputed to verify points on which a
District Judge desires to have fuller information but it considers that the inspection of a
subordinate Court and of its office and the report thereon should be the work of the Judge
himself.
C.L. NO. 71/IVF-79 DATED 31ST OCTOBER, 1964

Inspections of the subordinate courts and offices should be made by the District
Judges or the officiating District Judges themselves, and not by Additional District
Judges or other officers holding charges of the work of the District Judges in their
absence or for any other reason as required in rule 610 Chapter XXVI of General Rules
(Civil) 1957, Volume I.
C.L. NO. 130 DATED 28TH AUGUST, 1974 SUPERSEDES
C.L. NO. 66/H DATED 2ND JUNE, 1970

District Judges are required to inspect the work of Additional District and
Sessions Judges. They may authorize one or two senior Additional District Judges to
inspect the court of Munsifs.
C.L. NO. 12 DATED 27TH FEBRUARY, 1965

The District Judges are expected to answer the requirements of inspection
contained in the Court‟s General letter no. 111/35(a)-2, dated January 11, 1921 by
devoting one day to the Courts of Munsifs, Civil Judges not invested with sessions
powers and additional courts and two days time to the courts of Civil Judges exercising
sessions powers and Additional District Judges. Inspection of Nazarat, Copying
Department and Record Room may be made by devoting one day to each of them.
C.L. NO. 133/ADMN. (B) DATED 20TH DECEMBER, 1969
District Judges should make regular inspections, at least once in a year, of the
courts of Chief Judicial Magistrates and judicial officers doing criminal work and their
offices and furnish their inspection notes with compliance reports to the Court. While
making inspections of the aforesaid courts and offices, the following items should also be
taken into consideration:-
1.
Accommodation for courts and offices
2.
Furniture
3.
Notice Boards