# period under report

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 34
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1942-01-30
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 34
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/period-under-report-161940
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

5
Courts and Offices
existing
in
the
Judgeship
during
the
year
or
the
period under report
Name of Courts and
offices inspected by
the District Judge,
with
dates
of
inspections.

Name of Courts and offices
inspected by the Additional
District Judges as authorised
by the District Judge, with
dates of inspections.
Remarks,
if any

1
2
3
4

(ii) Annual remarks
G.L. No. 2/2(a)-4 dated 30th January, 1942 as modified and amended by
G.L. Nos. 5 and 68 of 1950 and 23 of 1951 read with
C.L. No. 34 dated 4th April, 1959
C.L. No. 11 dated 21st March, 1967 and
C.L. No. C-32 dated 24th March, 1969
Annual confidential remarks concerning the work and reputation of each judicial
officer who worked in the judgeship during the previous year, should cover the period
from April 1, to March 31, and be submitted in the prescribed form in duplicate so as to
reach the Court positively by second week of April.
C.L. No. C-30/77 dated 13th February, 1977
The year for the purpose of annual remarks is changed to June May w.e.f. the year
1976-77.
C.L. No. C-163/77-IV-f-45 dated 16th February, 1977
Revokes the aforesaid circular, and reverts back to previous practice namely that
the financial year (from the first day of April to the 31st day of March of the following
year) shall be the year for the purposes of recording annual remarks, as also for the
statement of out-turn and inspections of court and offices. It applies to the year 1977-78,
and onwards.
C.L. No. C-132/75 dated 17th October, 1975
In supersession of the instructions to the contrary contained in previous
General/Circular letters, the following revised form is prescribed for recording annual
confidential remarks on the work and conduct of Judicial Officers :-
Annual Confidential Remarks
Year................
Name of Officer.
Length of service.
Posts held during the year.
1.
Remarks by the District Judge regarding:
(a)
Integrity
of
the
officer
-
whether
beyond
doubt,
doubtful
or positively lacking.