# posting positively failing which no Last Pay Certificate will be issued to them

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 05/Budget-II
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1995-08-04
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 05/Budget-II
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/posting-positively-failing-which-no-last-pay-certificate-will-be-issued-to-them-162168
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

130
It has come to the notice of the Court that many Judicial Officers who have been
provided with telephone facility at their residence proceed on transfer without making
regular payment of telephone dues beyond the permissible limit (i.e. 700 calls bimonthly) thereby creating problems to the incoming Officers sometimes due to heavy
amounts, the Telephone Department disconnects the Telephone connection and heavy
expenditure is to be incurred by the Government on its re-connection and clearing off the
outstanding bills.
I am, therefore, to request you kindly to impress upon the officers, having
telephone facility in your judgeship to clear off the telephone dues (beyond the free calls
of 700 bi-monthly allowed by the Government) before proceeding to their new place of
posting positively failing which no Last Pay Certificate will be issued to them.
The Treasury Officer concerned may also be asked not to issue Last Pay
Certificate to any such Officer, without, a certificate, of clearances of dues on residential
phone from the District Judge.
The matter may please be treated as most urgent.
C.L. No. 05/Budget-II, dated 4th August, 1995
Regarding free local calls on residential telephones provided to the Judicial Officers
In continuation of Court‟s Letter no. 3945/B-II dated November 15,1990, on the
above subject, I am directed to send herewith a copy of the G.O.No.l370/VII-Nyay-l37/90,dated June 26,1995 and to ask you to circulate the copy of the said G.O. to all
concerned officers of your Judgeship, having official telephone at their residences and to
ensure strict compliance of the directions contained therein.
[19] COMPLAINTS AGAINST OFFICERS
G.L. No. 4/Xf-21 dated 4th March, 1952
All complaints against Judicial Officers should be referred to the Court for
directions.
C.L. No. 83/Xf-21 dated 31st May, 1971
While forwarding complaints against Judicial Officers to the Court, District Judges
should give their comments also and enquire into the complaints and take suitable action
in the matter.
131
C.L. No. 5/Admn. (B) Vig. dated 23rd March, 1971
On all complaints against an officer or a member of the staff sent for enquiry and
report, the District Judges should send complete report. It should invariably be to the
point, thorough and objective. Whenever necessary the record should also be perused
while sending the report and corrupt and inefficient officers/ officials should not be
shielded. A clear opinion should always be expressed on the allegations made. If the
allegations made are in respect of a pending or a decided case the opinion should be
expressed in clear words but without being too critical as Judicial Indipendence of an
officer has not to be curbed in any way. What has to be seen is whether the order passed
is or is not reasonable and also whether it was passed after taking into consideration all
the facts and circumstances of the case.
[20] VIGILANCE BUREAU OF THE COURT
C.L. No. 70 dated 14th August, 1968
All necessary assistance should be rendered to the Superintendent of Police
attached to the Vigilance Bureau established in the Court to curb the menace of
corruption as also to the police officers working under him whenever they visit the
districts in connection with enquiries. The assistance should include giving of access to
all official records required by them for the purpose.
C.L. No. CV 33/1987 dated 18th April, 1987
The District Judges should take up the enquiries into vigilance matter on top
priority basis and send their report to the Court expeditiously within the period stipulated
in C.L. dated 9.8.79.
C.L. No. 20/VG-23/Admn. (A) dated 20th August, 1999
Providing of facilities of stay, security, staff etc. to the officers of Vigilance Department
of the Court.
The Hon‟ble Court has been apprised of unexpected situation caused by noncooperation of the District Judges and the staff of the district court when the officers of
the Vigilance department visit a district in connection with enquiries. It has been noticed
that common courtesy of making arrangement for their stay, security, transport etc.
befitting to their status is not extended to them. They do not get access to the records
required in connection with the enquiry. In order to avoid the re-occurrence of the said
incidence, the Hon‟ble Court has desired that the following instructions may be followed
as soon as a visit of vigilance department is notified to district.
1.
Proper accommodation should be reserved in the name of the officer in Govt.
Inspection House or Govt. Guest House befitting to the status of the officer.
2.
Two
orderlies/peons
be
temporarily
attached
with
the
officer during his stay at the headquarter.
3.
Proper transport facility i.e. official vehicle be provided to him to perform
journey from the railway station to the Inspection House and from Inspection
House to the place of enquiry and to visit such places which are required to be
visited in connection with the enquiry. Such official vehicle facility be also