# Prosecuting Inspectors and Prosecuting Sub-Inspectors may be permitted by

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 12/VIII-a-40
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1953-01-31
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 12/VIII-a-40
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/prosecuting-inspectors-and-prosecuting-sub-inspectors-may-be-permitted-by-162652
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

328
C.L. No. 12/VIII-a-40; dated 31st January, 1953
Prosecuting Inspectors and Prosecuting Sub-Inspectors may be permitted by
District and Sessions Judges to inspect the records of sessions cases.
C.L. No. 79/Admn. (D); dated 23rd October, 1980
All possible cooperation and facility should be extended to the Investigating
officers of the Crime and Investigation Department for making the necessary records
available to them at the earliest.
If retention of copies of the records made available to the Crime Department is
considered necessary, Photostat copies thereof may be prepared and kept for record.
(iii) Application for information
C.L. No. 34/VIII-b-278; dated 4th April, 1968
Applications for information under rules 224 and 225 of the General Rules
(Civil), 1957, Volume I, should be entered in a register maintained in the following
form:-
S.
No
Date of
Application
Name of
applicant
Particulars
of the case
Brief
description
of
information
sought
Date when
information
furnished to
the applicant
Signature of
the recipient of
information
Remarks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10.
INSPECTION NOTES
C.L. NO. 29/H/Admn. (D) dated 19th March, 1990

Inspection notes recorded by the District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates.
I am directed to say that in spite of detailed directions contained in the various
circular letters, issued by the Court on the subject, it has come to the notice of the Court
that when queries are made from the District Judges regarding the compliance of the
directions, issued by them during the course of inspection, the reply generally sent by
them is that the official/officer concerned has noted the directions for compliance without
actually obtaining the signatures of concerned officer/official and without sending the
extract of the note along with the compliance report, which makes it to appear that the
directions have not been complied with or noted for compliance.
It is, therefore, requested that in future such compliance reports be submitted duly
noted and complied with by all concerned along with extract of the note containing the
compliance report.
Your attention is also drawn to the Court‟s C.L. No. 102/H/Admn. (D), dated
19.9.78 and C.L. No. 49H/Admn. (D) dated 25.4.79 which contain the proforma of
surprise inspection note as well but it is generally noted that surprise inspection notes are
not sent on prescribed proforma with the result that certain important information are not
received in the Court.