# Ram Dulari v. Moradabad Development Authority and others

- **Citation:** (2001) 2 ILRA 105
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2001-01-11
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/ram-dulari-v-moradabad-development-authority-and-others-39756
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES [2001

105
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
&,9
&,9,/ 6,'(
,/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21
%/( 0 .$7-8
7+( +21
%/( 0 .$7-8 -
 -
7+( +21
%/( 2 %+$77 -
7+( +21
%/( 2 %+$77 -

&LYLO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

6KHU 6LQJK
«3HWLWLRQHUV
9HUVXV
6WDWH RI 83 DQG RWKHUV
«5HVSRQGHQWV

&RXQVHO IRU WKH 3HWLWLRQHUV
6KUL 6. 6LQJK
6KUL 9. 6LQJK
&RXQVHO IRU WKH 5HVSRQGHQWV
6&

&RQVWLWXWLRQ RI ,QGLD $UWLFOH 6HUYLFH
/DZ7UDQVIHUDIWHU FUHDWLRQ RI QHZ VWDWH
8WWDUDQFKDO (PSOR\HHV ZRUNLQJ LQ 6WDWH
RI 83 7UDQVIHUUHG DJDLQVW WKHLU ZLOO
RQO\ RQ GHSXWDWLRQ IRU RQH RU WZR \HDUV
FDQ EH VHQW ± DIWHU H[SLU\ RI GHSXWDWLRQ
SHULRG
VKRXOG
EH
EURXJKW
EDFN
DQG
DQRWKHU IUHVK EDWFK EH VHQW RQ WKHLU
SODFH XQWLO ORFDO UHFUXLWPHQW LV PDGH
+HOG ± 3DUD
,W ZRXOG EH DGYLVDEOH WKDW LI FHUWDLQ
HPSOR\HHV DUH UHTXLUHG LQ 8WWDUDQFKDO
WKHQ 83 6WDWH *RYHUQPHQW HPSOR\HHV
FDQ EH VHQW RQ GHSXWDWLRQ IRU RQH RU WZR
\HDUV
WR
8WWDUDQFKDO
DQG
DIWHU
WKDW
SHULRG WKH\ VKRXOG EH EURXJKW EDFN WR
83
DQG
D
IUHVK
EDWFK
RI
6WDWH
*RYHUQPHQW HPSOR\HHV FDQ EH VHQW LQ
WKHLU SODFH 7KLV SURFHVV FDQ EH JR RQ IRU
D IHZ \HDUV XQWLO ORFDO UHFUXLWPHQW LV
PDGH

By the Court

1.

The
petitioner
has
been
transferred to Uttaranchal against the
impugned transfer order he made a
representation on 12.1.2001 and he may
make such other representation as advised
and the same will be decided by the
concerned authority within a month of
production of the certified copy of this
order.

2. Till disposal of the representation
the
impugned
transfer
order
dated
11.1.2001 and the order dated 19.2.2001
shall remain stayed.

The petition is disposed of.

3. We would also like to recommend
to the State Government that no State
Government
employee
should
be
permanently posted to Uttaranchal against
his wish. People living in the plains may
have difficulty in adjusting to hill areas if
they are permanently posted there against
their wish, and some of them may even
get mental depression, apart from other
hardships.

4. In our opinion, it would be
advisable that if certain employees are
required in Uttaranchal then the U.P. State
Government employees can be sent on
deputation for one or two years to
Uttaranchal and after that period they
should be brought back to (U.P.) and a
fresh
batch
of
State
Government
employees can be sent in their place. This
process can be go on for a few years, until
local recruitment is made.

5. Hence, we recommend to the U.P.
Government to reconsider it's policy and
consider our suggestion of not sending the
employees from U.P. permanently to
Uttaranchal against their wish but only on
deputation for short period.
2All] Ram Dulari V. Moradabad Development Authority and others

106
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
25,*,1$/ -85,6',&7,21
&,9,/ 6,'(
&,9,/ 6,'(
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
'$7(' $//$+$%$'
%()25(
%()25(
7+( +21
%/( %,12' .80$5 52< -
7+( +21
%/( %,12' .80$5 52< -
7+( +21
%/( '5 &+$8'+$5< -
7+( +21
%/( '5 &+$8'+$5< -

&LYLO 0LVF :ULW 3HWLWLRQ 1R RI

5DP 'XODUL
«3HWLWLRQHUV
9HUVXV
0RUDGDEDG 'HYHORSPHQW $XWKRULW\ DQG
RWKHUV
«5HVSRQGHQWV

&RXQVHO IRU WKH 3HWLWLRQHUV
6KUL 93 5DL
6KUL %% 5DL
&RXQVHO IRU WKH 5HVSRQGHQWV
05 3. 6LQJK
0U '9 -DLVZDO

&RQVWLWXWLRQ RI ,QGLD $UWLFOH DQG
3HWLWLRQHU GHVWLWXWH ZLGRZ DSSOLHG IRU D
KRXVH
XQGHU
D
6FKHPH
IORDWHG
E\
0RUDGDEDG
'HYHORSPHQW
$XWKRULW\
LQ
 RQ ILUVW FRPH ILUVW VHUYH EDVLV 6KH
IXOILOOHG DOO UHTXLUHPHQWV RI GHSRVLWV
5HVSRQGHQW 1R DOORWWHG WKH KRXVH LQ
TXHVWLRQ WR UHVSRQGHQW QR ZLIH RI WKH
JXQQHU
RI
&KDLUPDQ
RI
0RUDGDEDG
'HYHORSPHQW $XWKRULW\ GHVSLWH WKH IDFW
WKDW QHLWKHU UHVSRQGHQW QR QRU KHU
KXVEDQG LV DQ HPSOR\HH RI 'HYHORSPHQW
$XWKRULW\+HQFH
WKH
LPSXJQHG
DOORWPHQW
KHOG
WR
EH
DUELWUDU\
DQG
VKRZHG
IDYRULWLVP
,PSXJQHG
RUGHU
WKHUHIRUH TXDVKHG
+HOG 3DUD
7KH VFKHPH LQ TXHVWLRQ QHYHU SHUPLWWHG
DQ DOORWPHQW RI KRXVH LQ IDYRXU RI ZLIH RI
D
JXQQHUERG\
JXDUG
RI
DQ\
RI
WKH
RIILFLDOV RI WKH 0RUDGDEDG 'HYHORSPHQW
$XWKRULW\
$SSDUHQWO\
WKH
GLUHFWLRQ
LVVXHG
VKRZHG
IDYRXULWLVP
ZKLFK
LV
LPSHUPLVVLEOH
DQG
DJDLQVW
WKH
FRQVWLWXWLRQDO
SKLORVRSK\
HQVKULQHG
XQGHU
$UWLFOH
 RI WKH &RQVWLWXWLRQ
)XUWKHU LW LV LQGHHG UHJUHWWDEOH WKDW WKH
UHSHDWHG FU\ RI WKH GHVWLWXWH ZLGRZ ZKR
KDV ORVW KHU VRQ DQG ZDV UHVLGLQJ LQ D
GLODSLGDWHG KRXVH RQ UHQW KDG JRQH LQ
YDLQ

By the Court

1. The petitioner, who is a destitute
widow having lost her young son residing
on rent in a dilapidated house, and who
had applied for a house under a scheme
floated
by
Moradabad
Development
Authority in 1993 and having paid in that
regard a sum of Rs. 48,000 in all as
evident from Annexure-2, has come up
with a prayer to quash the Office
Note/D.O. dated 2.4.1998 as contained in
Annexure-3, and allotment order dated
2/4-4-1998 as contained in Annexure-4,
allotting House no. 5, Navin Nagar
Aawaasiya Yojna pursuant to order dated
12.12.1996 passed by Respondent No.1
and to command Respondent Nos. 1 & 2
to allot that house to her.

2. She asserts as follows:- As per the
scheme as contained in Annexure-1 to the
writ petition houses were to be allotted to
persons belonging to general category on
first come first served basis for which one
was required to deposit 25% towards cost
of the house alongwith his application and
further 25% at the time of handing over
possession of the house and remaining
amount of 50% was required to be
deposited in 48 equal instalments with an
interest rate of 16% per annum within a
span of four years plus 12% for freehold
charges; she fulfilled all requirements and
thereby was/is entitled to the house in
question; even though she had made
deposits but no action was taken by the
Development Authority ; she moved from
pillar to post but without any result; in the
meantime Respondent no. 2 allotted the