# Ram Kishun Fauji v. State of U.P

- **Citation:** (2019) 4 ILRA 863
- **Court:** High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- **Decided:** 2019-11-26
- **Case number:** Crl. Misc. First Anticipatory Bail Application No. 51463 of 2019
- **Bench:** Karuna Nand Bajpayee
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/ram-kishun-fauji-v-state-of-u-p-44965
- **Pages:** 2

## Headnote

Criminal Law - Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 - Section 438 - application- allowed
without expressing any opinion upon
ultimate merits of the case- while granting
bail the court observes the nature and
gravity of the accusation, antecedents of
the applicant, his undertaking to ma

## Text

4 All. Ram Kishun Fauji Vs. State of U.P.
863
close vigil over the health condition of the
applicant and would send the applicant to
the AIIMS, New Delhi for his periodical
medical check up as and when required at
the expenses born by the Government
during the period of trial only.
----------
(2019)12 ILR A863

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 26.11.2019

BEFORE
THE HON'BLE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE, J.

Crl. Misc. First Anticipatory Bail Application No.
51463 of 2019

Ram Kishun Fauji ...Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. ...Opposite Party

Counsel for the Applicant:
Sri Birendra Singh, Sri Anoop Kumar

Counsel for the Opposite Party:
A.G.A., Sri Vipin Kumar

A. Criminal Law - Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 & Indian
Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376, 452, 504
& 506 - application-rejection-applicant
committed rape - five criminal cases
registered against the applicant-having
criminal history the anticipatory bail is
rejected. (Para 5)

this is a serious matter in which the allegations
are to the effect that the applicant who is
having a revolver & rifle license had under the
coercion and show of force committed rape
upon her and kept the victim at the pain of
death. The father of victim has already died
and her mother is a widow helpless lady. The
applicant is an ex-army man and has already
been a Pradhan and wields enormous criminal
clout having a criminal history also, and by
using his muscle power he continued to molest
and outrage the modesty of the victim for a long
period of time and the first informant and her
mother could not dare to come out and could not
muster up courage to raise their voice under the
fear of being eliminated.in matters like this, brute
display of muscle power is capable to subjugate
the helpless girls and the belated reporting of the
offence and its late disclosure by itself remains
self-explained and on that ground the gravity of
the accusation does not get mitigated. (Para 4)

Crl.
Misc.
first
Anticipatory
Bail
application dismissed. (E-6)

(Delivered by Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.)

1. Shri Vipin Kumar, Advocate has
filed his Vakalatnama in the Court today
on behalf of complainant which is taken
on record.

This anticipatory bail u/s 438 Cr.P.C.
has been moved seeking the bail of
applicant namely Ram Kishun Fauji,
involved in Case Crime No.93 of 2019,
under sections 376, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C.,
Police
Station-
Chandpur,
District-
Fatehpur.

2. Heard learned counsel for the
applicant,
learned
counsel
for
the
complainant and learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.

3. Submission of the counsel is that
actually the first informant had some
illicit relationship with a different person
and as the applicant had raised objection
regarding the same he has been falsely
implicated in this case to continue their
illicit relationship. The delay in lodging
the F.I.R. has also been pointed out by the
counsel.

4. Heard learned A.G.A. as well as
counsel appearing for complainant who
has opposed this application and have
864 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES
submitted that this is a serious matter in
which the allegations are to the effect that
the applicant who is having a revolver &
rifle license had under the coercion and
show of force committed rape upon her
and kept the victim at the pain of death.
The father of victim has already died and
her mother is a widow helpless lady. The
applicant is an ex-army man and has
already been a Pradhan and weilds
enormous
criminal
clout
having
a
criminal history also, and by using his
muscle power he continued to molest and
outrage the modesty of the victim for a
long period of time and the first informant
and her mother could not dare to come out
and could not master up and mobilize
courage to raise their voice under the fear
of being eliminated. The details of the
molestation have been given in the F.I.R.
and the sadism of the accused has been
described as to how he gained sexual
contentment by being cruel with the
victim while doing the activity of coitus.
It transpires that when at some stage of
this continued history of torture the
accused also attempted to drag the victim
and take her to a tube-well that appears to
have proved the last straw on the camel's
back and the F.I.R. was then lodged. It
has also been pointed out by learned
A.G.A. that not less than 5 criminal cases
have been registered against the applicant
in the past including the present one. It
has further been contended that in matters
like this, brute display of muscle power is
capable to subjugate the helpless girls and
the belated reporting of the offence and its
late disclosure by itself remains selfexplained and on that ground the gravity
of the accusation does not get mitigated.

5. Without expressing any opinion
on the ultimate merits of the case and
after
considering
the
submissions
advanced
at
the
bar,
keeping
in
perspective, the nature and gravity of the
accusation and material in support of the
same and also keeping in view the
criminal antecedents of the accusedapplicant, I find no good ground for grant
of bail to the applicant.

6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail
application is rejected.
----------
(2019)12 ILR A864

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL SIDE
DATED: ALLAHABAD 29.11.2019

BEFORE
THE HON'BLE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE, J.

Crl. Misc. (Anticipatory Bail) Application No.
52922 of 2019

Abhhey Chopra ...Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. & Anr. ...Opposite Parties

Counsel for the Applicant:
Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, Priyanka Midha, Sri
Ram M. Kaushik

Counsel for the Opposite Parties:
A.G.A.

Criminal Law - Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 - Section 438 - application- allowed
without expressing any opinion upon
ultimate merits of the case- while granting
bail the court observes the nature and
gravity of the accusation, antecedents of
the applicant, his undertaking to make
himself
available
to
the
authorities
whenever required, and the overall facts
and circumstances of the case. (Para 5,6 & 7)

The matter deserves a deeper probe to
ascertain the truth and find out whether it was
just a case of consensual sex which continued
for some time between them or that it was a
case of a calculated sexual exploitation
perpetrated by the accused against the victim