# regard to the authenticity thereof - **Citation:** C.L. No. 53/VIIIa-18-Admn - **Court:** Allahabad High Court - **Decided:** 2007-03-31 - **Case number:** C.L. No. 53/VIIIa-18-Admn - **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/regard-to-the-authenticity-thereof-163361 - **Pages:** 2 ## Text 242 be released mechanically without a close scrutiny of the bail orders and satisfaction in regard to the authenticity thereof. C.L. No. 53/VIIIa-18-Admn. ̳G', dated 7th August, 1986 All the presiding officers should ensure that henceforth release orders are prepared by the court clerks only and not by the court moharrirs (police constables); and all the papers concerning any case, viz., F.I.R., remand papers, final reports, bail bonds, etc., are kept by the court clerk in his custody and not by the court moharrirs (police constables). C.L. No. 42/VIIb-47 , dated 28th April, 1978 All the presiding officers should put their signatures on the release or remand orders quite legibly as required under rules 9 and 66 of the G.R.(Criminal). A rubber seal indicating the name and designation of the presiding officer and also the name of the district should invariably be affixed to such orders below their signatures and they should ensure that the remand or release orders are dispatched punctually so as to reach the jail authority latest by 4.00 P.M. in winter and 5.00 P.M. in summer. C. L. No. 12 Dated March 31, 2007 In continuation of C.L. No. 4 dated February 3, 2004, now Sri S. Farid Raza, Joint Registrar, Sri S.K. Srivastava, Sri Rajiv Kumar Tandon and Sri Zia Ullah Khan, Deputy Registrars whose signature at gibe below are authorized to countersign on the bail orders. Specimen signature of Sri S. Farid Raza Specimen signature of Sri S.K. Srivastava Specimen signature of Sri Rajiv Kumar Tandon Specimen signature of Sri Zia Ullah Khan 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 4. BAIL ORDERS OF HIGH COURT C.L. No. 7 , dated 15th January, 1978 Accused or appellant should not be released on bail by a Magistrate only on production of a copy of the order of bail passed by High Court. It is necessary for a Magistrate to know the nature of an offence with which the person to be released has been charged. For this purpose he should consult his own records, or insist on the applicant's supplying him with a copy of the grounds of appeal or of the application for bail whenever a copy of the bail order alone is produced. Guidelines for transfer of bail applications in important matters and revision in matters at admission stage by the District Judges C. L. No.60/2007Admin(G) : Dated :13.12.2007. The practice developing of transferring important bail applications in serious matters and revisions at the admission stage in routine by the District and sessions Judges has been deprecated by the Hon'ble Court and it has been desired that all the sensitive matters should invariably be tried by the District Judge himself or by the Senior Additional. District Judge for exercising effective control on the administrative of justice. 243 Transfer of such work to additional Courts would be permissible only in the unavoidable circumstances. Therefore, I am directed to request you to kindly to ensure compliance of the above directions of Hon'ble Court in letter and spirit . 5. RELEASE OF MOTOR VEHICLES C.L. No. 24/VIII-108 Admn.(G), dated 30th April, 1988 The District Judge should ensure that in Motor Accident claim cases, the courts, as far as possible make Photostat copies of driving licence, registration certificate and the insurance certificate before releasing the vehicle involved in the accident and place them on the record of the case. Embossing Seal of the Court C. L. No. 3/2007 : Dated : 20th February , 2007 While enclosing herewith a copy of order and judgement dated 29.1.2007 passed by the Hon'ble Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application NO.1031 of 2007 - Bechan Prasad S/o Late Pati Ram Vs. State of U.P., I am directed to say that the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad vide Circular Letter No. 41/IX e-7 (Admin. 'F'/Allahabad dated August 18, 2000 had introduced embossing seal placed at the blue sticker affixed on certified copy of the order/judgment prepared by the Copying Department of the Court with the directions to the District Judges that the certified copy/judgement issued on or after 01.09.2000 bearing the eT1bossing seal at the blue colour sticker be given recognition. But me Hon'ble Court has noticed with concern that the directions in this respect are not being followed in letter and spirit that no notice of such orders without having embossing seal of the High Court be taken. I am, therefore, directed to request you to kindly ensure strict compliance of the direction as contained in the circular letter and bring its contents to the notice of all the Judicial Officers under your supervision and control in Judgeship for their guidance and strict compliance. C. L. No. 33/2007 : Dated 29th August, 2007 While deciding the First Appeal From Order No.2087 of 2007 United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Krishna Kumar and Others, Hon'ble Court has been pleased to record that experience has shown that in most of the cases one line order is being passed by the learned Judges of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal accepting or rejecting the application under Section 170 of the Act without giving any reason. It has been observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2003 {7) SCC 212 (United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jyotsnaben Sudhirbhai Patel) that there is mandate in such section to give minimum possible reason's to accept or reject such application. Therefore an specific direction is required to be issued to all the District courts to comply with the requirement or Section 170 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Therefore, enclosing herewith a copy of the above judgement and order of the Hon'ble Court, I am to request you to kindly bring to the notice of all the Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under your administrative control the above mandate of the Hon'ble Court for strict compliance.