# Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July…

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 104/Xb-13
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-07-14
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 104/Xb-13
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/registrars-subordinate-outlying-courts-and-offices-of-judicial-officers-should-162071
- **Pages:** 2

## Headnote

Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976 The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of

## Text

76
1. Total number of part-heard sessions trials pending.
2. Work done during each visit.
3. Reasons for not completing the sessions trials.
It is also necessary to obtain a report from the Additional/ Assistant Sessions
Judges as to the work done during each visit and reasons for not completing the sessions
trials while counter-signing their T.A. bills in respect of journeys performed in
connection with the hearing of part-heard sessions cases. After countersigning the T.A.
bill full information should immediately be sent to the Court.
(ii) On transfer
C.L. No. 104/Xb-13 dated 7th October, 1969
Officers going on transfer to their places of choice before the actual period of stay
of three years will not get any travelling allowance according to the rule 42 of Financial
Handbook Volume III.
C.L. No. 127/A.R.(A) dated 14th December, 1972 and
C.L. No. 1/D R (S) dated 1st January, 1975

No travelling allowance will be admissible in case of transfer made at the request of
an officer within two years of his posting at a particular station.
(iii) For local inspection
C.L. No. 44/VlIl-b-40 dated 3rd June, 1965
Following clarifications are issued with regard to rule 72 of General Rules (Civil),
1957, Volume I for guidance:
1.
The TA bill should be prepared in all cases whether the place of local
inspection is less than five miles or beyond and should be submitted to the
District Judges for counter-signature. After payment, it should be retained
in the Nazarat to serve as voucher instead of being filed with the record of
the case.
 2.
The Presiding Officer making local inspection at the request of a party or
parties is entitled to the travelling allowance at the rate of Rs. 1.50 P. for
the first mile of the onward journey and Rs. 0.75 P. for each succeeding
mile including the backward journey and to no daily allowance. He is
entitled to these rates even if he travels by a motor transport or by train,
but in case the journey is performed in a Government vehicle of another
officer, for which he does not pay the propulsion charges, he will not be
entitled to any travelling allowance. He shall also not be entitled to any
travelling allowance if he travels by a conveyance offered by a party or in
a borrowed conveyance for which he does not pay anything.
C.L. No. 68/VIIIb-40 dated 16th November, 1969
The Court expects that the presiding Officers will travel by a conveyance befitting
their dignity and status and will avoid the conveyance offered by a party.
77
They should, while going out on local inspection, use their own conveyance and if
they have no conveyance of their own they will, so far as possible, hire a taxi and should
avoid using a bus transport. The car of a brother officer may also be used provided the
necessary propulsion charges etc., are borne by him.
If it becomes necessary to travel by train for the purpose, they should travel in the
class they are entitled to.
C.L. No. 54 dated 14th May, 1969
All claims for travelling allowance in connection with the inspection of offices of
Sub-Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be
submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices.
C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976
The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes
not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing
not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of
correspondence in the matter.
The T.A. claims presented by the Officers working under District Judge may kindly
be countersigned without any delay after checking and verifying that the claims are
correct and are strictly according to the T.A. Rules and Government orders.
(iv) District & Sessions Judges to be controlling officer in respect of their own
Traveling Allowances.
C.L No. 75/Xb-13/Admn. (A), dated 18th August, 1994
Regarding all the District and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State declared to be
Controlling Officer in respect of their own travelling allowances
I am directed to refer to the U.P. Government FAX Message No. 4203/VII-Nyay-2734/86, July 14,1994, addressed to the Court and U.P. Government Letter No. 4203/VIINyay-2-734/86, dated July 19,1994, addressed to the Court and copies endorsed to you
and to all the Treasury Officers of U.P. as well as to the other concerned authorities, on
the above subject, and to say that the Government of Uttar Pradesh by virtue of its power
contained in Rule 88 (2) of Financial Hand Book, VoIume-3, has declared the District
and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State to be controlling officer in respect of their own
travelling allowances and that the District and Sessions Judge, in appendix-9 of Part I of
the Financial Hand Book Volume-3, shall be treated as included, accordingly.
I am further to say that the contents of the said Government FAX Message dated
July 14, 1994 and of the Government letter dated July 19,1994 are just same and,
therefore, the Court has determined that July 14,1994 i.e. the date on which the said Govt.
FAX Message/order has been issued, shall be the cut of date and accordingly,the
Travelling Allowance bills of the District and Sessions Judges relating to the journey
performed by them on 14th July,1994 or thereafter shall be dealt-with by them under the
authority conferred by the said Government letter.
I am, therefore, to request that the Government orders contained in the above FAX
Message and letter with regard to travelling allowance of the District and Sessions Judges