# Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July…

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 54
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-07-14
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 54
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/registrars-subordinate-outlying-courts-and-offices-of-judicial-officers-should-162072
- **Pages:** 1

## Headnote

Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976 The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of

## Text

77
They should, while going out on local inspection, use their own conveyance and if
they have no conveyance of their own they will, so far as possible, hire a taxi and should
avoid using a bus transport. The car of a brother officer may also be used provided the
necessary propulsion charges etc., are borne by him.
If it becomes necessary to travel by train for the purpose, they should travel in the
class they are entitled to.
C.L. No. 54 dated 14th May, 1969
All claims for travelling allowance in connection with the inspection of offices of
Sub-Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be
submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices.
C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976
The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes
not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing
not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of
correspondence in the matter.
The T.A. claims presented by the Officers working under District Judge may kindly
be countersigned without any delay after checking and verifying that the claims are
correct and are strictly according to the T.A. Rules and Government orders.
(iv) District & Sessions Judges to be controlling officer in respect of their own
Traveling Allowances.
C.L No. 75/Xb-13/Admn. (A), dated 18th August, 1994
Regarding all the District and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State declared to be
Controlling Officer in respect of their own travelling allowances
I am directed to refer to the U.P. Government FAX Message No. 4203/VII-Nyay-2734/86, July 14,1994, addressed to the Court and U.P. Government Letter No. 4203/VIINyay-2-734/86, dated July 19,1994, addressed to the Court and copies endorsed to you
and to all the Treasury Officers of U.P. as well as to the other concerned authorities, on
the above subject, and to say that the Government of Uttar Pradesh by virtue of its power
contained in Rule 88 (2) of Financial Hand Book, VoIume-3, has declared the District
and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State to be controlling officer in respect of their own
travelling allowances and that the District and Sessions Judge, in appendix-9 of Part I of
the Financial Hand Book Volume-3, shall be treated as included, accordingly.
I am further to say that the contents of the said Government FAX Message dated
July 14, 1994 and of the Government letter dated July 19,1994 are just same and,
therefore, the Court has determined that July 14,1994 i.e. the date on which the said Govt.
FAX Message/order has been issued, shall be the cut of date and accordingly,the
Travelling Allowance bills of the District and Sessions Judges relating to the journey
performed by them on 14th July,1994 or thereafter shall be dealt-with by them under the
authority conferred by the said Government letter.
I am, therefore, to request that the Government orders contained in the above FAX
Message and letter with regard to travelling allowance of the District and Sessions Judges