# Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July…

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 54
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1994-07-14
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 54
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/registrars-subordinate-outlying-courts-and-offices-of-judicial-officers-should-162074
- **Pages:** 2

## Headnote

Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices. C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976 The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of

## Text

77
They should, while going out on local inspection, use their own conveyance and if
they have no conveyance of their own they will, so far as possible, hire a taxi and should
avoid using a bus transport. The car of a brother officer may also be used provided the
necessary propulsion charges etc., are borne by him.
If it becomes necessary to travel by train for the purpose, they should travel in the
class they are entitled to.
C.L. No. 54 dated 14th May, 1969
All claims for travelling allowance in connection with the inspection of offices of
Sub-Registrars, subordinate outlying courts and offices of Judicial Officers should be
submitted along with the copies of inspection notes of respective offices.
C.L. No. 125/IV-B-685 dated 29th July, 1976
The Court has noticed that the T.A. claims submitted by the Officers are sometimes
not countersigned within time, with the result that the claim requires pre-audit causing
not only delay in payment of the amount to the officer concerned but also a lot of
correspondence in the matter.
The T.A. claims presented by the Officers working under District Judge may kindly
be countersigned without any delay after checking and verifying that the claims are
correct and are strictly according to the T.A. Rules and Government orders.
(iv) District & Sessions Judges to be controlling officer in respect of their own
Traveling Allowances.
C.L No. 75/Xb-13/Admn. (A), dated 18th August, 1994
Regarding all the District and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State declared to be
Controlling Officer in respect of their own travelling allowances
I am directed to refer to the U.P. Government FAX Message No. 4203/VII-Nyay-2734/86, July 14,1994, addressed to the Court and U.P. Government Letter No. 4203/VIINyay-2-734/86, dated July 19,1994, addressed to the Court and copies endorsed to you
and to all the Treasury Officers of U.P. as well as to the other concerned authorities, on
the above subject, and to say that the Government of Uttar Pradesh by virtue of its power
contained in Rule 88 (2) of Financial Hand Book, VoIume-3, has declared the District
and Sessions Judges of the U.P. State to be controlling officer in respect of their own
travelling allowances and that the District and Sessions Judge, in appendix-9 of Part I of
the Financial Hand Book Volume-3, shall be treated as included, accordingly.
I am further to say that the contents of the said Government FAX Message dated
July 14, 1994 and of the Government letter dated July 19,1994 are just same and,
therefore, the Court has determined that July 14,1994 i.e. the date on which the said Govt.
FAX Message/order has been issued, shall be the cut of date and accordingly,the
Travelling Allowance bills of the District and Sessions Judges relating to the journey
performed by them on 14th July,1994 or thereafter shall be dealt-with by them under the
authority conferred by the said Government letter.
I am, therefore, to request that the Government orders contained in the above FAX
Message and letter with regard to travelling allowance of the District and Sessions Judges
78
may be complied with immediate effect and the Travelling Allowance bills relating to the
journey performed on 14th July, 1994 or thereafter be dealt with by them under the
authority conferred by the said Government letter.
(v)
Economy in Traveling Expenses
C.L. No. 1648/Budget-ll, dated 2nd May, 1990
I am directed to say that Hon‟ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to observe that
the absence of the District Judges, in particular, from the Head Quarters, affects the
Judicial Administration of the district and therefore his Lordship has been pleased to
order that the District Judges should not leave the Head Quarters and come to Allahabad
or Lucknow, as the case may be, except on very urgent work, or when they are asked to
come either by the Hon‟ble the Chief Justice or by any other Hon‟ble Judge of High
Court.
Hon‟ble the Chief Justice has further ordered that the District Judges may issue
identical/ appropriate instructions to all the Judicial Officers in their respective districts
including outlying courts for strict compliance.
[12] VACATION:
(i)
Sessions Judge
C.L. No. 4/W/Admn.(A) dated 13th January, 1983
District and Sessions Judges, Additional District & Sessions Judges and Additional
Sessions Judges, who do not belong to vacation department, may be allowed 10 days‟
recess during civil court‟s vacation, with the prior approval of the Court, provided they
work during the remaining part/parts of the vacation. Such recess will be treated as
holidays under S.R. 42-A, F.H.B. Vol. II, Parts II to IV, and may be prefixed or suffixed
to leave subject to the conditions laid down in that rule.
2. Civil Judges (Assistant Sessions Judges), who belong to vacation department,
shall, under Subsidiary Rules 145 and 146, F.H.B. Vol. II, Part II to IV, be detained to
work during civil court‟s vacation; but, if the work permits, they may be allowed vacation
upto limit of 10 days with the prior approval of the Court. However, if a Civil Judge
(Assistant Sessions Judge) wants to avail himself of the whole or more than 10 days‟ of
the vacation, he may do so on application with the prior approval of the Court.
3. The Munsif-Magistrates and such Chief Judicial Magistrates, Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates, who are members of the U.P. Nyayik
Sewa and belong to vacation department, shall be detained to work during civil court‟s
vacation under Subsidiary Rules 145 and 146, F.H.B. Vol. II, Parts II to IV.
The Officers mentioned in paras 2 and 3 shall earn leave in accordance with
provisions of clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the second proviso to Fundamental Rule 81-B (1)
of the F.H.B. Vol. II, Parts II to IV and other provisions in this respect contained in the
Financial Hand Book aforesaid.
4. The Officers belonging to the vacation department and detained on duty
during civil court‟s vacation, shall furnish to the Court, immediately after the expiry of
vacation, their detention certificates, duly counter-signed by the District Judge concerned,