# regularisation of adhoc appointees in accordance with the law laid down by a Division

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D)
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1991-03-12
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D)
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/regularisation-of-adhoc-appointees-in-accordance-with-the-law-laid-down-by-a-162184
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

139
CHAPTER - II
STAFF

[1] APPOINTMENTS
 (i) Ad-hoc
C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D) dated 5th May, 1985
The District Judges are requested to dispose of the pending matters of
regularisation of adhoc appointees in accordance with the law laid down by a Division
Bench of Allahabad High Court in Writ petition No. 1207/1984 U.P. Civil Court‟s
Ministerial Service Association through its General Secretary, Lucknow v. State of U.P.
and others, wherein it has been held that adhoc appointees who fulfil the requisite
conditions, as laid down in the Regularisation Rules, shall be considered by the District
Judge for regularisation.
C.L. No. 16/IVh-36, Admn. "G" dated 27th March, 1989
Adhoc appointments which are generally made in the district courts of class III
employees bring bad name to the judgeship, and, therefore, it has to be discouraged. It
may be resorted to only in very urgent cases.
C.L. No. 17/Admn. (D) Section dated March 12, 1991
Concerning Ad hoc employees working in the Judgeship
I am directed to say that since in some Judgeship ad hoc employees are retained in
service according to the sanction made by Government whereas simultaneously in some
other Judgeships they are ceased to act, the ultimate result of such abrupt retrenchment is
that a number of representations are filed before the Court, Considering this aspect of the
matter and also to maintain an uniform policy on the subject the Court has been pleased
to direct you to send a complete list of employees working on ad hoc basis in your
Judgeship. It must also indicate the dates from which the ad hoc appointment were given
to each of such employees. Their nature of appointment may also be specified whether
they are appointed under Rule 269 General Rules (Civil) to clear off the arrears for a
certain period or their appointment is on year to year basis under Government Order.
You may also inform the Court whether retention of such employees is necessary in
future considering the work load of Judgeship. Also specify whether present strength is
insufficient to cope with the work load of Judgeship. If so, you may send justification
within a week from the receipt of Court‟s order so that matter may be moved to
Government for creation of regular posts.
I am also to add that Government often puts barrier on fresh appointments and issue
orders for termination of ad hoc appointees-. You are hereby informed that you may not
act merely on Government orders in this regard without prior permission of this Court as
it kills the interest of litigant public and if you have ceased the employees merely on the
basis of G.O., their services be restored so that work may not suffer.