# regularisation of adhoc appointees in accordance with the law laid down by a Division - **Citation:** C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D) - **Court:** Allahabad High Court - **Decided:** 1991-03-12 - **Case number:** C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D) - **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/regularisation-of-adhoc-appointees-in-accordance-with-the-law-laid-down-by-a-162185 - **Pages:** 2 ## Text 139 CHAPTER - II STAFF [1] APPOINTMENTS (i) Ad-hoc C.L. No. 29/Ve-4/Admn.(D) dated 5th May, 1985 The District Judges are requested to dispose of the pending matters of regularisation of adhoc appointees in accordance with the law laid down by a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Writ petition No. 1207/1984 U.P. Civil Court‟s Ministerial Service Association through its General Secretary, Lucknow v. State of U.P. and others, wherein it has been held that adhoc appointees who fulfil the requisite conditions, as laid down in the Regularisation Rules, shall be considered by the District Judge for regularisation. C.L. No. 16/IVh-36, Admn. "G" dated 27th March, 1989 Adhoc appointments which are generally made in the district courts of class III employees bring bad name to the judgeship, and, therefore, it has to be discouraged. It may be resorted to only in very urgent cases. C.L. No. 17/Admn. (D) Section dated March 12, 1991 Concerning Ad hoc employees working in the Judgeship I am directed to say that since in some Judgeship ad hoc employees are retained in service according to the sanction made by Government whereas simultaneously in some other Judgeships they are ceased to act, the ultimate result of such abrupt retrenchment is that a number of representations are filed before the Court, Considering this aspect of the matter and also to maintain an uniform policy on the subject the Court has been pleased to direct you to send a complete list of employees working on ad hoc basis in your Judgeship. It must also indicate the dates from which the ad hoc appointment were given to each of such employees. Their nature of appointment may also be specified whether they are appointed under Rule 269 General Rules (Civil) to clear off the arrears for a certain period or their appointment is on year to year basis under Government Order. You may also inform the Court whether retention of such employees is necessary in future considering the work load of Judgeship. Also specify whether present strength is insufficient to cope with the work load of Judgeship. If so, you may send justification within a week from the receipt of Court‟s order so that matter may be moved to Government for creation of regular posts. I am also to add that Government often puts barrier on fresh appointments and issue orders for termination of ad hoc appointees-. You are hereby informed that you may not act merely on Government orders in this regard without prior permission of this Court as it kills the interest of litigant public and if you have ceased the employees merely on the basis of G.O., their services be restored so that work may not suffer. 140 C.L. No. 35/Ve-4/Admn. (D) dated May 27. 1992 Appointment of class III employees on Ad-hoc basis I am directed to inform that no ad hoc appointment on class III posts be made without prior approval of Hon‟ble the Chief Justice. C.L. No. 66/2007Admin(D) : Dated :13.12.2007. Recruitment of Staff . It has been brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Court that a large number of vacancies are pending in various judgeships of the State which is hampering the judicial functioning of the Subordinate courts which are already under tremendous constraint due to mounting rate of new cases being filed every year necessitating the increase in the existing sanctioned strength of the staff. Therefore the Hon'ble Court has desired that in the first place, to surmount this problem, in all the judgeships, the existing vacancies be filled up immediately making recruitment under the existing Rules, Circular Letters and the G.Os. adopted by the Court. Therefore you are requested to kindly fill up the existing vacancies in your judgeship at the earliest in accordance with the existing Rules C.Ls. And the G,Os. C.L. No. 36 Dated : Allahabad : July 19, 1996 Information Regarding ad hoc Appointments made in the Judgeships subordinate to High Court it has come to the notice of the Hcn‟ble Court that ad-hoc appointments have been made by the District Judges without the prior permission/sanction of the Hon‟ble Court, The Hon‟ble Court has directed that the District Judges should furnish, the following information‟s so that appropriate action in the matter may be taken: 1. State the number, the name of the candidates with details of parentage, their addresses, the date of their appointments and the period for which they have been appointed, 2. Whether any previous permission of the Hon‟ble Court has been obtained before making such appointments/, if so, the copy of the order communicated by the Hon‟ble Court may be enclosed. 3. State whether the appointments have been made under Rule 269 of. General Rules (Civil) or any other provisions contained in any Statuette 4. Also enclose the photo-stat copy of the appointment letters. I am therefore, to request you to kindly comply the directions of the Hon‟ble Court by furnishing the afores aid information‟s at the earliest. C.L. No. 10/Admn. (D) dated March, 11, 1997 Information regarding Ad-hoc appointments made in the Judgeship. to High Court I am directed to refer to the courts circuler letter No. 36/Admn. (D) dated 19.7.1996 on the above subject and to request you kindly to furnished requiste informations as asked for therein to the court, at a very early date.