# reputation of Judicial Officers contained in G.O. No. CR-259/II-A-38-56, dated July 16

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 86
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1957-07-16
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 86
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/reputation-of-judicial-officers-contained-in-g-o-no-cr-259-ii-a-38-56-dated-161950
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

8
C.L. No. 86 dated 19th September, 1957
The instructions with regard to the remarks to be given about the work and
reputation of Judicial Officers contained in G.O. No. CR-259/II-A-38-56, dated July 16,
1957, should be strictly complied with.
C.L. No. 17 dated 5th March, 1965
While furnishing figures about themselves and the subordinate Officers for annual
remarks the District Judges should thoroughly check them and ensure that only correct
figures are furnished to the Court.
C.L. No. C-54/71 dated 16th April, 1971
Annual remarks recorded by the District Judges should give a correct and full
picture of the work, conduct and reputation of the Officers. In case annual remarks do not
properly assess the work of the Officers, administrative lapse on the part of the District
Judge concerned would be presumed.
C.L. No. 42 dated 25th April, 1968
District Judges should send their annual remarks about the work and conduct of Judicial
Magistrates after obtaining the remarks of Chief Judicial Magistrates. Further, the annual
remarks about each individual Judicial Magistrate should be sent on separate sheets along
with the remarks of the Chief Judicial Magistrates.
C.L. No. C-32 dated 12th March, 1976
Annual remarks about the criminal work of Munsif Magistrates are to be given by
the Chief Judicial Magistrate who will submit them to the District Judge and the District
Judge will transmit them to the Court along with his annual remarks.
C.L. No. 45 dated 7th August, 1963
C.L. No. C-36/70, dated 31st March, 1970
C.L.No. C-5/73 dated 15th January, 1973 and
C.L. No. 40/74 dated 16th March, 1974
Annual remarks about all Officers who have worked for three months or more
should invariably be recorded and sent to the Court.
C.L. No. 17/78 dated 2nd February, 1978
In evaluating the Judicial work of an officer, the number of his judgments, orders
reversed or modified in appeal or revision will not be taken into account. The assessment
of Judicial work of an officer will be based on the quality of his judgment or orders and
not on the result of the appeals or revisions. Henceforth the work of an officer will be
assessed on the basis of quality of his judgments or orders and not on the basis of the
number of judgments or orders reversed or modified in appeal or revision.
C.L. No. C-60/81 dated 19th September, 1981
The District Judge, while inspecting the Courts of Additional District Judges &
Additional Sessions Judges and also while recording annual remarks in respect of
Additional District Judges and Additional Sessions Judges should examine some records