# rules, the remaining two copies being reserved for the copying office

- **Citation:** C.L.No.14/X-a-14
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1954-01-18
- **Case number:** C.L.No.14/X-a-14
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/rules-the-remaining-two-copies-being-reserved-for-the-copying-office-163949
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

482
of the spare copies may be sent to the lower court for information as required under the
rules, the remaining two copies being reserved for the copying office.
C.L.No.14/X-a-14 dated 3rd March, 1964

The judgment in civil and criminal appeals should be typed out by the
stenographers in triplicate instead of in quadruplicate and out the two spare copies of the
judgment one may be sent to lower court for information required under the rules and
other copy kept reserved for the copying department. This copy may be indexed and kept
in a separate cover captioned ―For Copying Department‖ along with the record and on
receipt of an application for copy; it may be handed over to the copying department for
being issued after making a note to the effect on the index (C.L.No.8/X-a-14 dated
January 18, 1954, modified).
C.L.No.54/Ve-47 dated 26th August, 1983

The courts of the Munsif-Magistrates who have been provided with stenographers
should see that at least three copies of judgments are prepared and kept in file.
(xii) Preservation of judgments involving government servant
C.L.No. 81 dated 7th September, 1957
If requested by the District Magistrates, judgments in criminal cases, appeals and
revisions involving government servants may be retained for periods longer than five
years as prescribed under rule 118 of the General Rules (Criminal), 1957.*
(xiii) Facility for reporting
C.L.No.12/IX-f-4 dated 20th January, 1956

Such accredited representatives of newspapers, whose names have been approved
of by the District Judge should, at the discretion of the presiding officers concerned, be
given facilities for reporting contemporaneous cases, i.e., to say, cases which are wanted
by them for current publication.

They should be allowed to see the judgments on the date of delivery for the
purpose of reproduction in newspapers without comments. Permission should only be
given for taking down notes from judgments and not to make verbatim copies.
20.
LEGAL AID
C.L.No.34/VII-d-108 (Admn.)(F) dated 16th May, 1984

The work relating to the legal aid schemes should be done outside court hours and
if any camps are organized, they should be organized on non-working days. It was also
indicated that the officers and the staff attending the legal aid camps would not be treated
as on duty so as to entitle them to any traveling or daily allowances or compensatory
leave. Obviously, therefore, the officers could take part in the legal aid programme
according to the directions of the District Judge and if any camps were held outside the
headquarters, the expenses on traveling and daily allowance could be borne not by the
Court but by the Legal Aid and Advice Board.

* NOTE: Now 1977 vide notification no.504/Vb-13 dated 5.11.83