# rules, the remaining two copies being reserved for the copying office

- **Citation:** C.L.No.14/X-a-14
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1954-01-18
- **Case number:** C.L.No.14/X-a-14
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/rules-the-remaining-two-copies-being-reserved-for-the-copying-office-163951
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

482
of the spare copies may be sent to the lower court for information as required under the
rules, the remaining two copies being reserved for the copying office.
C.L.No.14/X-a-14 dated 3rd March, 1964

The judgment in civil and criminal appeals should be typed out by the
stenographers in triplicate instead of in quadruplicate and out the two spare copies of the
judgment one may be sent to lower court for information required under the rules and
other copy kept reserved for the copying department. This copy may be indexed and kept
in a separate cover captioned ―For Copying Department‖ along with the record and on
receipt of an application for copy; it may be handed over to the copying department for
being issued after making a note to the effect on the index (C.L.No.8/X-a-14 dated
January 18, 1954, modified).
C.L.No.54/Ve-47 dated 26th August, 1983

The courts of the Munsif-Magistrates who have been provided with stenographers
should see that at least three copies of judgments are prepared and kept in file.
(xii) Preservation of judgments involving government servant
C.L.No. 81 dated 7th September, 1957
If requested by the District Magistrates, judgments in criminal cases, appeals and
revisions involving government servants may be retained for periods longer than five
years as prescribed under rule 118 of the General Rules (Criminal), 1957.*
(xiii) Facility for reporting
C.L.No.12/IX-f-4 dated 20th January, 1956

Such accredited representatives of newspapers, whose names have been approved
of by the District Judge should, at the discretion of the presiding officers concerned, be
given facilities for reporting contemporaneous cases, i.e., to say, cases which are wanted
by them for current publication.

They should be allowed to see the judgments on the date of delivery for the
purpose of reproduction in newspapers without comments. Permission should only be
given for taking down notes from judgments and not to make verbatim copies.
20.
LEGAL AID
C.L.No.34/VII-d-108 (Admn.)(F) dated 16th May, 1984

The work relating to the legal aid schemes should be done outside court hours and
if any camps are organized, they should be organized on non-working days. It was also
indicated that the officers and the staff attending the legal aid camps would not be treated
as on duty so as to entitle them to any traveling or daily allowances or compensatory
leave. Obviously, therefore, the officers could take part in the legal aid programme
according to the directions of the District Judge and if any camps were held outside the
headquarters, the expenses on traveling and daily allowance could be borne not by the
Court but by the Legal Aid and Advice Board.

* NOTE: Now 1977 vide notification no.504/Vb-13 dated 5.11.83
483

The reconciliation of disputes is done by the members of the committee, which
includes lawyers and social workers. The judicial officers should not take active part in
reconciliation of disputes but there is no objection to their otherwise taking part under the
guidance of the District Judge and in advising and guiding suitably the members of the
committee in the performance of their functions. The judicial officers who have original
territorial jurisdiction in the area where a camp is held should not be associated with the
camp activities and assistance may be had from other judicial officers.

An officer of the rank of Munsif-Magistrate/Judicial Magistrate or Chief Judicial
Magistrate to be nominated by the District Judge is supposed to be the member-secretary
of the District Legal Aid Committee. His functions are mainly of administrative nature
and he too need not come in direct touch with litigants much less in the matter of
reconciliation of disputes.

The District Judges may make available a room or other improvised
accommodation in their buildings for establishing a legal aid office where certain
members of the committee and the staff of the legal aid office may sit and transact their
business.
C.L.No. 28/VII-d/108-admn.(F) dated 3rd June, 1985

In the capacity of Chairman of the District Legal Aid Committee, District Judges
are supposed to take active interest in implementing the scheme of legal aid. In case any
guidance or advise in implementing the scheme is needed, they may seek necessary
guidance and advice from the U.P. Legal Aid and Advice Board, 510, Jawahar Bhawan,
Lucknow, under intimation to the Court.
C.L.No.81/VII-d-108/LAAB/LA dated 4th December, 1987

The District Judges should send the monthly progress reports in the requisite
proforma to Executive Chairman, U.P. Legal Aid and Advice Board, 510, Jawahar
Bhawan, Lucknow on the first day of the following month positively.
Circular Orders of the High Court
PROFORMA
STATISTICAL INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO IMPLEMENTATION OF
LEGAL AID PROGRAMME IN THE DISTRICT OF ..............FOR THE
MONTH OF ...........
1. LEGAL AID
No. of Applications pending
on the 1st of the month
No of applications
received during the month
No of
applications
disposed of
Balance
carried forward
2. BREAK UP OF BENEFICIARIES
SC
ST
BC
WOMEN
CHILDREN
OTHERS
TOTAL

3. NO OF LEGAL AID CAMPS HELD AND CASES DISPOSED OF
No. of camps
Persons
benefitted
Cases
decided
MACT cases
decided
Compensation
awarded