# Section 4 of the U.P Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holdings Ordinance (No. 3 of

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 32/Ceiling/Admn.(g)
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1986-01-13
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 32/Ceiling/Admn.(g)
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/section-4-of-the-u-p-imposition-of-ceiling-of-land-holdings-ordinance-no-3-of-163230
- **Pages:** 1

## Text

182
C.L. No. 32/Ceiling/Admn.(g) dated 13th May, 1986
Section 4 of the U.P Imposition of Ceiling of Land Holdings Ordinance (No. 3 of
1986) bars the jurisdiction of District Judges, Additional District Judges, Civil Judges,
and Additional Civil Judges, to hear appeals under section 13, 20 and 21 of the principal
Act and provides further that such appeals pending immediately before the
commencement of the Ordinance no. 3 of 1986 before any District Judge, Additional
District Judge, Civil Judge and Additional Civil Judge shall stand transferred to the
Commissioner and shall be disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the
U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act as provided by the U.P. Ordinance No.
3 of 1986 promulgated by Government on January 13, 1986.
 The District Judge should bring this fact to the notice of all concerned officers.
(v)
Compliance of provisions mentioned under Order XLI Rule 9 of CPC
C.L. No. 19/2008 Admin (G): Dated: 4.9.2008
Upon consideration of the Judgment and Order dated 25.10.2002 passed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v. Union of India,
the Hon'ble Court has been pleased to direct that the Appeal shall be filed under Order
XLI, Rule 1 in the Court in which it is maintainable and a copy of the memorandum of
appeal which has been filed in the Appellate Court should also be presented before the
court against whose decree the appeal has been filed and the endorsement thereof shall be
made by the decreeing court in a book called the Register of Appeals.
Therefore, in supersession of earlier C.L. No./2007/Admin (G) Dated 13.12.2007.
I have been directed to say that the Hon'ble Court has desired that the contents of this
Circular Letter be brought to the notice of all the officers working under your
administrative control for strict compliance of the directions.
15.
MISCELLANEOUS CASES
(i)
Adoption of abandoned or destitute children
C.L. No. 40/VII f-45-Admn. (G) dated 29th May, 1986
The directions of Hon'ble Supreme Court contained in its orders dated 6th
February, 1984, and 27th September, 1985 and 13th February, 1986 passed in L.K. Pandey
v. Union of India reported in AIR 1984 SC 469 and AIR 1986 SC 272 respectively,
should be strictly complied with by all.
EXTRACT OF ORDER DATED 13 FEBRUARY, 1986
In respect of children who have been abandoned or brought prior to 27.9.85 in the
State in which the application for guardianship sought to be made with a view to eventual
adoption, the court to which the application is made will satisfy itself where such children
have been abandoned or brought within the State prior to 27.9.85 and if the court is so
satisfied, the requirement laid down by us in the main judgment and the supplementary
judgment that the children should not be allowed to be brought from one State to another
for adoption except subject to certain conditions, as also the requirement that where the
children sought to be adopted are abandoned or destitute children, they should be cleared
by the Juvenile Court, shall not be applicable to such children. The Court may for this
purpose require the scrutinizing agency to visit the Home or Homes where such children