# special reason been released on bail

- **Citation:** C.L. No. 112
- **Court:** Allahabad High Court
- **Decided:** 1993-12-15
- **Case number:** C.L. No. 112
- **Source:** https://unisonlegal.in/judgment/allahabad-high-court/special-reason-been-released-on-bail-163623
- **Pages:** 2

## Text

355

When the offence is of such a nature that the appellant may be a source of danger
to the public, as in the case of an offence under section 124-A and other seditious
activities or a case under section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appeal
should be disposed of with the least possible delay even if the appellant has for some
special reason been released on bail.
50. FORMS AND RULES IN GENERAL RULES (CRIMINAL)
C.L. No. 112 dated 28th August, 1975
All the courts are to follow the rules and forms prescribed in General Rules
(Criminal) with such modifications as may be necessary for regulating the practice and
proceedings of their courts.
51. INSPECTION OF RECORD IN CRIMINAL CASES
C.L. No. 96/VIII-42 dated 28th September, 1970

Under rule 139 of General Rules (Criminal)) 1957+ a separate register for making
entries with respect of inspection in criminal cases only should be maintained in Form
No. 6 of General Rules (Civil), 1957.
52.
COMPLIANCE OF HIGH COURT'S JUDICIAL ORDERS
G.L. No.2/VIII-b-6-30 dated 5th May 1943 read with
C.L. No. 45/VIII-a dated 4th May, 1953

A certificate that the judicial order of the High Court exercising criminal
jurisdiction has been complied with and necessary action taken must be sent by lower
criminal courts invariably to the High Court in every case.
C.L. No. 41/VIII-a-30 dated 28th May, 1965
In addition to the certificate mentioned above a quarterly statement, showing
compliance and reasons for non-compliance of the Court's orders should be sent to the
Court by the end of the month following the quarter in question. Further, as soon as in
compliance with the order to surrender to bail, the accused has surrendered or is arrested,
the fact should be communicated by the Sessions Judge the District Magistrate or vice
versa before whom the convict has surrendered or has been produced after arrest.
C.L. No. 88/Admn.(B) dated 1st June, 1974

Chief Judicial Magistrates must make prompt compliance of all judicial orders
issued by the Court.
C.L. No. 165/VIII-h-37 dated 17th November, 1977

The District judges should see that notices or warrants in habeas corpus petitions
sent to them for service are given top priority for expeditious service and to ensure that
the compliance reports are sent to the Court within time, by registered post A.D.

+ Note: Now 1977 vide Notification No. 504/Vb-12 dated 5.11.1983
356
C.L. No. 32 dated 22nd May, 1981

All the District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates are directed to see that the
orders of the Court are properly complied with, with all promptness and reports
regarding compliance of Court's orders are sent immediately to the Court after the orders
have been served and complied with.
C.L No. 19/VIIIb-119Admn.(G) dated 11th April, 1989

Whenever a reference is made to the Chief Judicial Magistrate of the district
concerned regarding an inquiry and report about demise of an appellant in a case pending
in the Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate generally forwards to this Court the statement
of the police pairokar and statements of one or two witnesses of that area, without
applying his mind. This practice is not satisfactory.

Henceforth in such matters the Chief Judicial Magistrate should ensure that the
police submit a correct report regarding the death of the appellant and after getting
himself satisfied with the report so submitted by the police, he should forward the same
to the Court.
53.
COMPLIANCE OF ORDERS OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT
(i)
Copy of Court's order dated 25.11.1993 passed in Criminal Misc. Case
No.669 of 1993 Surya Prakash Dubey and another v. C.J.M. & others.
C.L. No. 8O/Admn.(A) dated December 15, 1993
I am directed to send herewith a copy of Court's order dated 25.11.1993 passed to
Criminal Misc. Case No.669 of 1993 Surya Prakash Dubey and another v. Chief Judicial
Magistrate and others for compliance.

I am also to request you kindly to emphasize upon the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
working under you to comply with the aforesaid orders of the Court strictly, in future.
Hon'ble R.K. Agarwal, J

Compliance report from the C.J.M. Pratapgarh has not been received regarding
service on opp. party no.4. Notice was sent by the office to the C.J.M. Pratapgarh on
27.10.93 with a direction that the notices be returned to this Court by 11.11.93. It is a
matter of regret that C.J.M. Pratapgarh has not taken any care to see that the compliance
of the Court's order is made. The Court has noticed that C.J.Ms. do not pay proper
attention for complying with the Court's order and the cases are to be adjourned on
account of non-compliance of the Court's orders. This state of affair is highly deplorable.
District Judge concerned also cannot ignore this state of affair and should during regular
inspection as well as surprise inspection must see that the court's orders are, as this lapse
also would affect their efficiency regarding administrative control, duly complied with by
the CJ.Ms. concerned. Addl. Registrar is directed to send a copy of this order to all the
District Judges and C.J.Ms. and also to the Government advocate. List in the week
beginning from 2Oth December, 1993.
C.L. No. 27/dated July 7, 1995
It has come to the notice that the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court in criminal
cases are not often complied and in most of the cases compliance reports are not